RamblinRod
Member
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Messages
- 54
- Likes
- 4
- Points
- 8
What makes our team better, Chris Paul without Nic Batum or Tony Parker with Nic Batum?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If we can get him on an extension, I'd just as soon have TP and Nic. I know CP3 is better than TP. Just would prefer to see Batum stay, so I'd take a downgrade at PG to keep him.
Batum is nice, but in reality, he is nothing but a role player.
CP3 is the best PG in the league. You simply make that deal
Batum is nice, but in reality, he is nothing but a role player.
CP3 is the best PG in the league. You simply make that deal
Paul. Pretty easily.
I like Batum and would really like to see Parker on our team, but... Chris Paul would be incredible.
Ed O.
What if we could get CP3 AND Peja? We know Peja is that much better than Batum![]()
Batum is nice, but in reality, he is nothing but a role player.
CP3 is the best PG in the league. You simply make that deal
LA has one SUPERSTAR on their roster. And a bunch of good players in a good system. Superstars win in this league. Unless it's stars that win. Unless it's systems that win. Unless it's TEAMS that win. Etc. There's more than 1 way to win in the league.
Batum is nice, but in reality, he is nothing but a role player.
CP3 is the best PG in the league. You simply make that deal
As much as I hate to admit it, Pau Gasol is more than a "good" player. He has proved to be a top PF in this league, and one of the leagues best players.
As much as I hate to admit it, Pau Gasol is more than a "good" player. He has proved to be a top PF in this league, and one of the leagues best players.
LA has one SUPERSTAR on their roster. And a bunch of good players in a good system. Superstars win in this league. Unless it's stars that win. Unless it's systems that win. Unless it's TEAMS that win. Etc. There's more than 1 way to win in the league.
This is a situation where you can't lose. CP is good enough to let you forget about Batum. Parker is a PG that would fit into the system that we have and would be a perfect compliment to Batum. Wither way you can't lose. If it came down to management HAVING to choose between wither player I wouldn't care on the choice, I would be happy regardless.
I think it comes down to how one defines "superstar". If you define "superstar" as one of the top 3 players in the league at his position, I think we would find that almost all of the titles in the last couple decades have been won by a team with 2 superstars.
Pau seems to be borderline there.
And most have said we'd need a healthy Oden to win anyways. If healthy, he's likely top 3 at his position, and Roy. So we'd have our two.
Also I'd add that at the time Boston won there title, I don't know if Pierece or Allen would be considered top 3 at their position. Maybe Garnett.
I'd rather we asked, which is better: CP3 and Batum or Tony Parker and LMA?
Not that I think New Orleans would go for LMA and his contract, but it's certainly a question I enjoy answering a lot more.