Rastapopoulos
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2008
- Messages
- 42,141
- Likes
- 26,499
- Points
- 113
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe Dame or Giannis in the summer but that wouldn't happen this season.Who's going to take the fall: Dame, Doc or Giannis?
What if they rebuild before we get draft picks?!Feel bad for dame. But controlling 3 years of bucks drafts at the end of this decade is starting to look great.
How do you rebuild without your own picks?What if they rebuild before we get draft picks?!
I actually wouldn't mind having Dame back, because we have plenty of salary on this roster that is easily expendable for him, for the next 2 years.
The kick in the pants is 26-27 when he's what...37, making almost 60 mil. I'd package, Simons/Thybulle/RW3 for him without blinking if it weren't for that 3rd year.
Let some other team give him that 60 million. The Blazers off-loaded it, it seems insane to take it back.
I'd much rather get picks for Simons/ Thybulle / RW3 no matter what picks they are.
Is Lillard going to play for the vet minimum the following season? Or be gone again?
The Blazers should use the salary in 26-27 to make the team better in that season and to build for future seasons. Not pay the supermax salary of a 37 year old has been.On the other hand: the Blazers won't have much on the books in 26-27. We'd be paying Sharpe whatever,but everyone else would still be on their rookie scale salaries aside from Avdija.
View attachment 67183
The Blazers should use the salary in 26-27 to make the team better in that season and to build for future seasons. Not pay the supermax salary of a 37 year old has been.
A better way to look at it would be that ‘26-‘28 seasons will be our prime years for competing with a cheap young core. Having cap space shouldn’t give us an excuse to make a bad cap move.On the other hand: the Blazers won't have much on the books in 26-27. We'd be paying Sharpe whatever,but everyone else would still be on their rookie scale salaries aside from Avdija.
View attachment 67183
Who's going to take the fall: Dame, Doc or Giannis?
That being said, Giannis might be outta there by then.Wild Idea:
Dame and Giannis don’t get it done in Milwaukie while we build around a core of Scoot, Shae, our draft this year, and Clingan. Dame and Giannis decide to run it back on their goal in Portland and we won’t have to give up any of those guys.
I get Giannis will be 34 by then, but it doesn’t really matter, he is another big ball handler that would guarantee at least 4 ball handlers on the court playing at the PF position next to DoBro. Whether it’s Camara and a couple depth pieces + their ‘30 pick back or a sign-and-trade for Avdija + their ‘30 pick back and 2nds, I think we will have the assets to trade for a 34yo Giannis.
What could they even get for Dame?
I think all of the guys you mentioned besides Deandre are all still too green and/or redundant (Ant) to help Dame win games in the regular season let alone the playoffs.It's ironic that Damian on the Blazers current roster would be a really good roster for him.
Well, ironic isn't the right word. Frustrating.
(yes I know trades involving him included some of these players, shut up...)
Imagine him with Tou, DeAndre, DC, Rupert, Deni, Sharpe, Scoot and Simons....
I bet the Lakers would love to add him, but matching that much money is insane.
The Bucks should just fire Doc and hire Stotts to straighten out their offenseHe's worth most to the Warriors. If drafted by a non-Stotts team, would Lillard have always been the player he is now?
The Bucks should just fire Doc and hire Stotts to straighten out their offense
No question Jrue 2-3 years ago was a huge part of that defense. He's still very effective.Transition defense is a part of defense.
Before tonight Bucks were 24th in the NBA in defensive efficiency. But it was also a problem last year - they were only 19th in the NBA last year.
Season before Dame was there the Bucks were 4th in the NBA in defensive efficiency.
I don't think it was a coincidence the Bucks won a title with Jrue playing defense and the Celtics won the title with Jrue playing defense last season.
Dame is great in many ways. But it's very hard to build a title winning roster with such a limited short poor defender on a supermax contract. We're seeing that's the case even when he is paired with arguably the best player in the league.
My bet is Doc takes a fall if this doesn't turn around quickly.
It's the quickest move. They won't be trading Dame or Giannis to fix this.The bucks were like 30-13, then fired their coach and I think are 4 games under .500 since
I thought they couldn't do this. https://fanspo.com/nba/teams/Bucks/17/draft-picks?origin=serp_autoHow do you rebuild without your own picks?
If they ever do want to look at trading Giannis think we'd have to be part of the deal.
Right now obviously we're many years away from trying to acquire a Giannis player directly.
But we could be the 3rd team. Something like we give the Bucks their picks and OKC sends us Jalen Williams plus multiple Clippers picks.
...or, pay 80M/year for Simons and Ayton
Deni is looking like he'll be at least a long term rotation player and likely more then that. 23 years old and under a friendly contract for the next 4 years is a solid return which I backed then and now.Yeah that was the big part of the Deni trade I didn't like, that we sold the 2029 pick which could be as high as #2 overall.
Yeah I think the best use of cap space soon would be to take on an overpaid contract to acquire a first round pick as the Spurs did and OKC did many times prior to that.Yeah, I hope Cronin does not do that. I'm not a big fan of the idea of getting Dame back, but what if it's essentially having Dame replace Simons?
The Blazers aren't going to sign any big free agents. There's a possibility they could do a lop sided trade, with their cap space.