Dame Time (for a trade)…

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

If you were GM, what would you do:

  • Trade Dame, start the rebuild around Simons, Sharpe, and #3 Pick (Scoot or Miller)

    Votes: 17 54.8%
  • Trade Simons, #3 Pick, possibly Sharpe to build around 33 year old Dame

    Votes: 14 45.2%

  • Total voters
    31
The only reason this choice is being discussed is because of Dame… it’s his comments that suggest he would want to be traded if we keep the pick. The sad thing is, any potential trades would probably take a year or two to gel and build chemistry. In that same time, the #3 pick can get some good experience and development to contribute significantly. Dame is forcing the teams hand. And to think Dame didn’t play a role in not trading his best friend CJ when we should have is naive. That was our biggest trade chip for most of Dame’s prime.
 
Sucks because there's a lot of cool people here but threads like these make me I'm happy I'm not as invested here as I used to be
You don’t like threads that debate one of the biggest decisions in team history, that all the national media is taking about as well?
 
Really? A other thread saying the same stuff as half the other threads?
Yeah this was needed.
Im back in the “merge threads” camp now.

Now time for me to starts some threads.

Lets see…

Is there a Dame sucks thread? Nope. Ill create one.

Is there a Dames overated thread? Nope. Ill create one.

Is there a “if you don't like this thread, dont open it” thread? Nope. Ill create one.


This place sometimes… lol. Its like the boomerang show….
 
You don’t like threads that debate one of the biggest decisions in team history, that all the national media is taking about as well?

How many threads you need to discuss this? Ill create a few more for you to add to the half dozen threads this is already being discussed…
 
Really? A other thread saying the same stuff as half the other threads?
Yeah this was needed.
Im back in the “merge threads” camp now.

Now time for me to starts some threads.

Lets see…

Is there a Dame sucks thread? Nope. Ill create one.

Is there a Dames overated thread? Nope. Ill create one.

Is there a “if you don't like this thread, dont open it” thread? Nope. Ill create one.


This place sometimes… lol. It’s like the boomerang show….
Wanting to censor people’s opinions and literary works….who do think you are, Florida?
 
Wanting to censor people’s opinions and literary works….who do think you are, Florida?

Not censoring if what is being said has already been said many many times. Its more like an eyeroll… heeere we go again…..
Its where we voice our opinions. Not whether we do or not.

but i get it. He who screams the loudest gets heard the most right?
 
What is more likely:

Getting a top 75 player of all-time on the roster, near their prime, again... or.... getting a top 3 pick again?

We could do the math on this if you believe all things are equal (Spoiler, it's the top 3 pick). Or if you don't think it's equal, we could debate if a franchise, like the Blazers has a more advantages or disadvantages in obtaining/retaining a top 75 player.

I factor this in when I think of what trades I would except for #3 and for Dame. Neither option is "right" in my opinion, it's about what direction will extract the most value.

This just feels like an argument that Neil should be tarred and feather for wasting the prime of a top 75 player. You have oversimplified the situation.

Top 75 player (on the downside of his career) or a top 3 pick (in a really good draft.)

Not all drafts are created equal and Dame won't be a superstar for a lot longer. It's like you guys think Dame will play at a high level for another 10 years. The guy is already showing signs of slowing down. He can't stay healthy. He used to be an iron man.
 
I feel like the poll is misleading. I know where the poll-maker's sympathies lie (it's obvious from the inclusion of Dame's age) but it still skews in favor of keeping Dame because people are free to put any fanciful trade they want in there. "Obviously we should keep Dame because we're getting Bridges/Brown/Siakam/Paul George!" No we're not. OG Anunoby maybe.
 
So some random posts in a thread about another topic… and you get this bothered?

oh there are more. Just added another. Ill call it at three though.
Its not about being bothered bro. Its about limited time on here. If you are simply going to regurgitate the same stuff already beeing said and discussed, why not do it in one of the existing threads focused primarily on this topic, vs creating a new thread for clicks? Of which tou have to enter and not ignore(@Natebishop3 ) to confirm its the same ole shit. By then its too late.

Im not saying dont voice your opinion. But maybe put more consideration as to how and when.
Thats all.
 
oh there are more. Just added another. Ill call it at three though.
Its not about being bothered bro. Its about limited time on here. If you are simply going to regurgitate the same stuff already beeing said and discussed, why not do it in one of the existing threads focused primarily on this topic, vs creating a new thread for clicks? Of which tou have to enter and not ignore(@Natebishop3 ) to confirm its the same ole shit. By then its too late.

Im not saying dont voice your opinion. But maybe pit more consideration as to how and when.
Thats all.
So you think this topic doesn’t deserve its own thread… just some random mentions in other threads?
 
So you think this topic doesn’t deserve its own thread… just some random mentions in other threads?

Something tells me you didn't actually open or read the other threads. First one i posted is specifically about not trading ant and ends with we should trade Dame. That was the op.

Random?
hardly. Im iust paying more attention than you it seems.
 
Something tells me you didn't actually open or read the other threads. First one i posted is specifically about not trading ant and ends with we should trade Dame. That was the op.

Random?
hardly. Im iust paying more attention than you it seems.
So this topic doesn’t deserve it’s own thread and central location for all fans to see because you read every post in every other thread and it’s been mentioned before… ok, got it.
 
So you think this topic doesn’t deserve its own thread… just some random mentions in other threads?
How is this thread any different then the one you started the other day, besides you added a poll? You even started both threads with the exact same line. " He will be 33 to start the season"?
 
So this topic doesn’t deserve it’s own thread and central location for all fans to see because you read every post in every other thread and it’s been mentioned before… ok, got it.

Nah. Its pretty clear you don't got it. But ill let you think you do. :).
 
How is this thread any different then the one you started the other day, besides you added a poll? You even started both threads with the exact same line. " He will be 33 to start the season"?

Because its a new thread for a new day. change a couple words and its a completely new topic! Yay!
 
Dame leaving (or staying) is the biggest topic on this team since LMA left. I'm not sure why anyone would be surprised that people would want to share opinions or discuss it a lot.
 
Dame leaving (or staying) is the biggest topic on this team since LMA left. I'm not sure why anyone would be surprised that people would want to share opinions or discuss it a lot.
Only random thoughts about it in non related threads is allowed I guess, LOL.
 
It’s a risk, but pairing Sharpe and Miller and surrounding them how Boston did with Tatum and Brown gives us the best chance going forward

Defensive playmaking pg
Rebounding, defensive 4 & 5
Yeah this seems much more likely to someday contend than trading 3 for a vet and contending now with Dame.

I mean odds are most players won't become Tatum and Brown so yeah more likely this doesn't work. But there are many dozens of cases of teams winning by drafting a couple great guys, vs zero cases of someone like Dame leading a team to a title at his age and his type of game.
 
Really? A other thread saying the same stuff as half the other threads?
Yeah this was needed.
Im back in the “merge threads” camp now.

Now time for me to starts some threads.

Lets see…

Is there a Dame sucks thread? Nope. Ill create one.

Is there a Dames overated thread? Nope. Ill create one.

Is there a “if you don't like this thread, dont open it” thread? Nope. Ill create one.


This place sometimes… lol. Its like the boomerang show….
Go create them, if it's a worthy topic people will reply, discuss, and the thread will stay active. If not it'll fade to page 2, of 853 pages and be irrelevant.
 
So one thread about Ant and two mega threads with hundreds of posts most site visitors will never read.

I think you proved why threads such as this should be created. Thanks.
 
Only random thoughts about it in non related threads is allowed I guess, LOL.

This is the OP of one of the threads i linked:

Before he's traded by this loser organization and becomes better than Lillard as early as next season while also being a decade younger, in what will be remembered as just one of many boneheaded moves this team has done, I want it to be fully noted that I wanted us to keep Ant and trade Lillard

How is that some random post in a non related thread?

but like i said. You aren't gonna get it.


Peat and repeat go swimming in S2. Peat decided to move on. Who's left?
The same handful of people discussing the same thing in many threads, creating new threads and spinning in circle with their opinions that have been repeated more times than my post count….
 
oh there are more. Just added another. Ill call it at three though.
Its not about being bothered bro. Its about limited time on here. If you are simply going to regurgitate the same stuff already beeing said and discussed, why not do it in one of the existing threads focused primarily on this topic, vs creating a new thread for clicks? Of which tou have to enter and not ignore(@Natebishop3 ) to confirm its the same ole shit. By then its too late.

Im not saying dont voice your opinion. But maybe put more consideration as to how and when.
Thats all.

If your fighting the fight to not waste time how about you don't read or post in this thread?
 
How about you don't post in this thread? Some of us want to discuss these things. You can go spam other mega threads.

if I want to post in this stupid thread, I will. and if I want to say this is a stupid thread when I'm posting in this stupid thread, then I'm going to say it's a stupid thread when I'm posting. Maybe I'll say it often for my own entertainment. Knowing it bugs the shit out of you is a bonus. Go freedom!

and LOL at "spam"...so opinion is now spam. OK. We're all spammers on this bus

by the way...stupid thread!
 
R
So one thread about Ant and two mega threads with hundreds of posts most site visitors will never read.

I think you proved why threads such as this should be created. Thanks.

Okay. Lol. You guys keep thinking this hasnt been regurgitated in most threads on a daily basis.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top