Dante Cunningham

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Fez Hammersticks

スーパーバッド Zero Cool
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
29,207
Likes
9,899
Points
113
McMillan said he expects both Cunningham and Pendergraph to make the team. Possible replacements for Frye and Outlaw? He sounds like he has potential as a role player.

After a fairly unspectacular first three years of his college career, Cunningham emerged as Villanova's leading scorer as a senior, averaging 16.1 points to help lead the Wildcats to their first final four in 24 years. He was usually the lone post player on the court for Villanova and flourished, also leading the team in rebounding with 7.5 rebounds. Cunningham was named the most improved player in the Big East and a second team all-conference selection after improving on his averages of 10.4 points and 6.5 rebounds as a junior. Much of his improvement has been attributed to his work ethic, which is one of his biggest strengths. Despite being a bit undersized, Cunningham played power forward in the Big East against NBA-caliber big men such as DeJuan Blair and Greg Monroe and held his own. Cunningham makes up for his lack of bulk with an outstanding mid-range jumper. He became a reliable safety valve for Villanova's guards to find around the free-throw line, where Cunningham was able to draw bigger opponents away from the protecting the rim. Cunningham has great hands and possesses good stamina. His constant pursuit of the basketball is a product of his work rate, and he is developing as a better shot blocker. The biggest negative about Cunningham is that he is built more like a small forward than someone who can bang down low in the NBA. There are also questions as to how well he can finish against the superior athletes at the next level. Cunningham is a likely second-round draft pick who may eventually be able to gain a spot in a nine-man NBA rotation.

The only reason Cunningham will make it is his mental makeup. Other players are more athletic, bigger and stronger, but his great basketball IQ and work ethic allow him to compete. Few players have improved as much as Cunningham has in his four years at 'Nova. He came in as a freshman and did the dirty work for a very good team. Year after year he did what was best for the team and this past season he became an important scorer on another very good team. He will be able to contribute at the next level and I believe he will be a solid role player because of his work ethic and team-first mentality.

Has improved drastically each year. Really knows how to do the little things and play the game the right way. Has a very smooth and effortless face-up jump shot. Very soft touch on his jump shot. Will be an effective pick-and-pop big man. Consistently hits everything from the foul line in. Is the best mid-range shooting big man in this year's draft. Plays bigger than his height and has a long wing span. Has a very high basketball IQ. Shoots high-percentage shots. Gets his hands on a lot of balls defensively, which create turnovers. Tremendous motor and doesn't remain stagnant when he doesn't have the ball. Loves to go down low and post up his defender, but when he can't get position he makes sure that he pops back up to set picks. Has good shot selection. Understands positioning on the boards on both ends and uses his body to box his man out and grab boards. Uses a very good jab stop to create space on his jumper. Does a good job of clearing space for his teammates to attack the rim.

cunninghamx.jpg


NBA Comparisons: George Lynch/Joe Smith​
 
Last edited:
College basketball is full of kids with great intangibles. To make it in the NBA, they also need talent and skill. Frankly, I'd be happier if we had kept Brockman.
 
College basketball is full of kids with great intangibles. To make it in the NBA, they also need talent and skill. Frankly, I'd be happier if we had kept Brockman.

Agreed. The NBA ain't college ball. He can have all the heart he wants, but at the end of the day he'll have to get it done or else.
 
College basketball is full of kids with great intangibles. To make it in the NBA, they also need talent and skill. Frankly, I'd be happier if we had kept Brockman.

So, outside of being a "local kid", how much talent and skill did Brockman really have? He was a short PF, with a small wingspan and basically a football players body.

You change the university that he went to, and 90% of those who are upset we didn't keep him would all the sudden think he was a wasted pick.
 
Is this a bad time to point out that McMillan thought Taurean Green would win us 4 or 5 games?
 
Consistently hits everything from the foul line in. Is the best mid-range shooting big man in this year's draft.

Is the NBA full of these guys? Hell No
 
Everyone repeat after me:

Taurean Green is going to win some games for us.
 
He did win us a game. The Clippers game. Green's spirit took over Von Wafer's body and lead us to a triumph.
 
Is this a bad time to point out that McMillan thought Taurean Green would win us 4 or 5 games?

Why Pritchard allowed Nate to make that call, I don't know. I'm betting Pritch won't let it happen again. IMO, Mills is going to stick in this league, without a doubt. There's a big difference between those two players.
 
Why Pritchard allowed Nate to make that call, I don't know. I'm betting Pritch won't let it happen again. IMO, Mills is going to stick in this league, without a doubt. There's a big difference between those two players.




Mills on the surface reminds me of Jose Barea. I'm not sure that's a perfect comparison, but I think it's damn close.
 
Barea is a pretty good backup. That's pretty much all we can hope for out of the 55th pick.
 
Is this a bad time to point out that McMillan thought Taurean Green would win us 4 or 5 games?

Hahaha.

Cunningham is a mediocre player in a very good conference. I would be quite surprised if he gets (m)any minutes as a Blazer.

Ed O.
 
Hahaha.

Cunningham is a mediocre player in a very good conference. I would be quite surprised if he gets (m)any minutes as a Blazer.

Ed O.

In Kevin Pelton's comparison formula, Cunningham's closest past collegiate now in the NBA, and within 6 months in age, is David Lee. They were over 95% similar to each other at the same stages.
 
I think some of you are missing the point of the pick. I wouldn't argue that Blair should have been the pick if we were basing our decision solely on his production at a relatively young age. But, we don't live in a vacuum. We have team needs. We have to consider longevity and even more aspects. I think it was clear that we were drafting with those picks to replace the loss of Ruffin, Randolph, Frye, and possibly Outlaw. This team doesn't need rebounding as much as it needs defense, toughness, and heady play. Those are the roles we need filled.

Pendergraph and Cunningham give us that at a cheap, reliable rate. It's the perfect low cost, higher reward scenario. They can come in next year and produce right away.

I'm very excited about the defensive and gritty style of play they'll bring off the bench and in practices for us.
 
Given that Taureen Green got us more value than Sergio last night, then probably not.



Sergio's trade may be the difference in being able to sign a starter Maxie. For example, Hedo wants 50 mil for 5 years. That is a salary starting just over 8.5 million per. Getting out from Sergio's contract gets us to about 7 mil, and renouncing Freeland and Koponen gets us another 1.6 milion, or the exact ammount Hedo seems to want. So what if it ends up being Sergio for Hedo? That's pretty damn good value isn't it?

I think that KP is a great judge of talent, but is not a good judge in the price of someone. Which, by the way, scares the shit out of me come FA time.
 
I think that KP is a great judge of talent, but is not a good judge in the price of someone. Which, by the way, scares the shit out of me come FA time.

I do not know about that - other than the Martell contract which is still to be determined - he was not too bad so far. Joel was paid fairly (even more than that if you consider what some people paid for players like Dalambert and Darko), Blake and Travis were good value, who else did he sign to a contract?
 
I do not know about that - other than the Martell contract which is still to be determined - he was not too bad so far. Joel was paid fairly (even more than that if you consider what some people paid for players like Dalambert and Darko), Blake and Travis were good value, who else did he sign to a contract?




I was talking more about the draft really and in trades. I think he gets so caught up in "identifying and getting" that he gives up too much sometimes. Maybe not though :dunno:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top