AFully22
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2017
- Messages
- 955
- Likes
- 1,180
- Points
- 93
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bullshit, I just don't trade a 23 year old Center with a ton of upside. Who will be a RFA..
For a nearly 30 year old Center who is clearly declining.
But inconsistent Nurk is still better than consistent Jordan.The bigger picture is that Dame and CJ are in their window now... they can’t wait 3 years for Nurk to be consistent
But inconsistent Nurk is still better than consistent Jordan.
Or maybe if he had a PF playing the weak side that he could drop bunny passes to when the defense commits to him. Or a SF who knows how to make nice cuts behind the defense. You know, like we saw with Vonleh and Harkless last season? But instead he has Aminu camped out on the 3-point line and Turner doing fuck-all.He’d be even better if he wasn’t relied on so much offensively. His efficiency goes up when his usage goes down. That’s on Olshey.
Or maybe if he had a PF playing the weak side that he could drop bunny passes to when the defense commits to him. Or a SF who knows how to make nice cuts behind the defense. You know, like we saw with Vonleh and Harkless last season? But instead he has Aminu camped out on the 3-point line and Turner doing fuck-all.
Exhale...
1) All this debate about a Center who at best would be a sideways move, when WE ARE BLEEDING AT THE SF POSITION doesn't make sense to me.
2) If we can get DJ without giving up a 1st rounder, Collins, or out big 3 (yes, including Nurk), then I'd consider it.
We do need to concentrate our talent.
3) This is probably just a stunt by Jordan's agent.
4) In the stupid Bill Simmons trade, I'd literally rather have any player the other teams are getting. I'd rather
have Love than DJ. I'd rather have Batum than DJ, and I'd rather have Dwight Howard than DJ.
5) After the 15 seconds you've taken to read this post.... WE ARE BLEEDING AT THE SF POSITION.
Here is a link to G-F and G-F in their first 3 years. If Neil does another one of his value trades, then
Super Mario makes sense.
http://bkref.com/tiny/AhjP7
He's got a cool name, killer hair and can dunk garage thrown at the rim.
Nurk is the real mystery box, he can be anything in three years. This time you keep the mystery box.
If any fan ran this team we would never make a trade to go all in. They would be to busy saying we can't beat this team , we can't beat that team. Keep the team young and develop.
What. Other than we always want trades all the time it seems accurate. Or notTell me, what else is happening in that parrelel universe?
Jordan might be a Blazer? Jordan might be a Ruse.
Here is a link to G-Fs and G-Fs in their first 3 years. If Neil does another one of his value trades, then Super Mario makes sense.
http://bkref.com/tiny/AhjP7
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...-money-offered-for-deandre-jordan?share=other
Cavaliers Trade Rumors: JR Smith, Tristan Thompson Offered for DeAndre Jordan
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...-money-offered-for-deandre-jordan?share=other
Cavaliers Trade Rumors: JR Smith, Tristan Thompson Offered for DeAndre Jordan
What about Gallinari? He is a 6’10” SF/PF that can hit the three and pass... I know he is injury prone but is exactly what this team is looking for, and at the same time we can probably unload Turner in a trade for him, and not break up the core. I can’t think of a better player that will cost less in trade. Turner and 1st or Swanigan for Gallinari?
OK, I take back what I said. If Thompson and JR are what LAC is getting as DJ bait, then absolutely ET and either Meyers or Mo may be in play. Hell, I might add a protected later first if they did that.
I mean, Cleveland could also offer Smith and Thompson for Antetokounmpo. The fact that they offered it (in this hypothetical), doesn't mean a slightly better or substantially similar offer is "in play."
The Clippers aren't taking a bunch of bad contracts for Jordan--they'd be better off (by far) letting him walk for nothing.
I mean, Cleveland could also offer Smith and Thompson for Antetokounmpo. The fact that they offered it (in this hypothetical), doesn't mean a slightly better or substantially similar offer is "in play."
The Clippers aren't taking a bunch of bad contracts for Jordan--they'd be better off (by far) letting him walk for nothing.