Exclusive Deoxygenated Blazers Fall in Game 1 to Denver

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
Nice take. The theme seems to be “we lost” not “they won”. While we did make mistakes and lost, is some of that due to the Nuggets?

Much of the same could have been said last year.

I feel we are better than last year but somewhat concerned about playing a team with composure (not like OKC).

I will be very interested in how we adjust and do game two. Game one raises questions but is no reason to panic.
 
GrandpaBlaze said:
Nice take. The theme seems to be “we lost” not “they won”. While we did make mistakes and lost, is some of that due to the Nuggets?

Much of the same could have been said last year.

I feel we are better than last year but somewhat concerned about playing a team with composure (not like OKC).

I will be very interested in how we adjust and do game two. Game one raises questions but is no reason to panic.
Click to expand...

Sure, Denver is owed a bit of due, but it is mostly a case of we lost to ourselves. Minus the mistakes the Blazers made, even minus half of them, the Blazers win.

We are far better than last year. We have a bench for one. They need to do better. Hood had a great game. Turner actually did good rebounding and facilitating. Curry needs to step up. We need him in double digits. Meyers did ok. Collins could do better.

It was more so our starters. McCollum, Aminu, and Chief need to play better. I do think it is a matter of getting used to the altitude. Blazers need to breathe in that Denver air today...get used to it...acclimate. Game 2 will be the Blazers.
 
Yeah even the very best have to give the winner some credit for playing well. Denver played a good overall game.
 
This wasn't a Blazer loss, this was a Denver win. Our legs and energy were fine. Jokic is simply that good. And when Milsap and Murray get going, they're tough to beat. They were smart and had a good gameplan. They knew we were likely rusty so they overplayed us. We didn't react well. I expect us to be better on Wednesday.

Denver is the #2 seed for a reason. Without Nurk, this series is going to be an uphill battle when they put in Plumlee. They're just too big and strong for us. Either go really small (which Jokic can match with his perimeter game) or play a lot more Zach and MyLe.

In terms of Jokic, make him defend. If he has to work on defense, it affects his offense. Run him. Screen him. Lean on him.

Other than that, we need a much bigger contribution from guys like Mo and Chief. If they don't stretch Denver's defense and make them pay for doubling Dame, then we're going to have problems.
 
The Professional Fan said:
Oh they flat beat us.
Click to expand...

Sure. The six missed free throws by normally solid Dame, CJ and Seth aren’t correctable because of the Nuggets’ vast superiority. Nor are the crazy unforced turnovers. Denver just flat beat us. Their role players always shoot lights out. There is no hope. All is lost.

Do I really need to use green font?
 
maxiep said:
This wasn't a Blazer loss, this was a Denver win. Our legs and energy were fine. Jokic is simply that good. And when Milsap and Murray get going, they're tough to beat. They were smart and had a good gameplan. They knew we were likely rusty so they overplayed us. We didn't react well. I expect us to be better on Wednesday.

Denver is the #2 seed for a reason. Without Nurk, this series is going to be an uphill battle when they put in Plumlee. They're just too big and strong for us. Either go really small (which Jokic can match with his perimeter game) or play a lot more Zach and MyLe.

In terms of Jokic, make him defend. If he has to work on defense, it affects his offense. Run him. Screen him. Lean on him.

Other than that, we need a much bigger contribution from guys like Mo and Chief. If they don't stretch Denver's defense and make them pay for doubling Dame, then we're going to have problems.
Click to expand...
No, Portland played bad in every aspect putside of making shots. Theyre not better than us.
 
BonesJones said:
No, Portland played bad in every aspect putside of making shots. Theyre not better than us.
Click to expand...
Im not sure, if they’re better than the Blazers but I keep going back to styles and I think their style is not something the Blazers are well equipped to beat without Nurkic. Im not saying the Blazers cant or wont win, but I think this is a really tough matchup not just because of personnel with Jokic and Milsap but because their two man game of Jokic and Murray is hard to stop without an elite defensive presence.
I think this might be the series we need Zach to play a major role, he is a legit shot blocker, and not scared of anyone.
 
Neither team played well. Denver kept fucking up and giving us chances that we couldn’t seem to capitalize on. It was overall a boring game, a fluke for both teams and not a good metric to go by moving forward. Jokic played good though, that’s going to be something we can count on moving forward. We had an unusually sub-par team performance and I don’t see that happening tonight.

I personally don’t feel altitude will be an issue tonight. People adjust quickly, athletes adjust quicker, and 5,000’ isn’t actually that crazy from an oxygen-content perspective. About a 4% difference from sea level, and remember, these guys travel often and are not shocked by performing in varying altitudes.
 
Last edited:
jonnyboy said:
Neither team played well. Denver kept fucking up and giving us chances that we couldn’t seem to capitalize on. It was overall a boring game, a fluke for both teams and not a good metric to go by moving forward. Jokic played good though, that’s going to be something we can count on moving forward. We had an unusually sub-par team performance and I don’t see that happening tonight.

I personally don’t feel altitude will be an issue tonight. People adjust quickly, athletes adjust quicker, and 5,000’ isn’t actually that crazy from an oxygen-content perspective. About a 4% difference from sea level, and remember, these guys travel often and are not shocked by performing in varying altitudes.
Click to expand...
4% is true for total oxygen content. However is is approximately a 20% reduction from what the body is use to.

Having experienced this situation, I think you are underestimating the effects of the altitude change.
 
tester551 said:
4% is true for total oxygen content. However is is approximately a 20% reduction from what the body is use to.

Having experienced this situation, I think you are underestimating the effects of the altitude change.
Click to expand...
I work (and play/hike) at varying elevations between 3,000-7,500 feet that change on a daily to weekly basis, so I’m no stranger to altitude change. But I also don’t play NBA level basketball, so I could very well be underestimating the effects altitude has on a fine-tuned human specimen, which (sigh) I am not.
 
jonnyboy said:
I work (and play/hike) at varying elevations between 3,000-7,500 feet that change on a daily to weekly basis, so I’m no stranger to altitude change. But I also don’t play NBA level basketball, so I could very well be underestimating the effects altitude has on a fine-tuned human specimen, which (sigh) I am not.
Click to expand...
Yeah, 5-7K really isn't really noticeable, IMO. Now when I was at 14K I almost fell over from dizziness! Obviously I have no way of knowing how much it would affect someone playing a competitive game over the course of a few hours - I would think that it would take its toll. But after being there for 5 days they should definitely be acclimated by now. I still think it's an advantage for DEN's players, as they'll just be in better condition because of constantly training at that altitude - then when they come down to sea level it's like a turbo boost!
 
But some times, there are singular issues that define whether or not a team goes home happy, and in Game 1 Monday night in Denver, that issue for the Trail Blazers was turnovers. They shot well enough to win (52 percent from the field and 38 percent from three), made the same number of field goals as the Nuggets (41), scored more points in the paint (56 to 50), more second chance points (15 to 13) and won the rebounding battle (40-34). Usually that’s enough to come away with a win, but not if you turn the ball over 18 times for 23 points, as the Blazers did Monday night at the Pepsi Center.

"We had some soft plays, soft turnovers, especially at the end of the half," said Trail Blazers head coach Terry Stotts. "The other ones driving into the lane, there was a couple of offensive fouls. But there’s no question the turnovers hurt us. It was a good offensive game, but I thought the turnovers really made the difference."---Source: Official Blazers site.
 
BonesJones said:
No, Portland played bad in every aspect putside of making shots. Theyre not better than us.
Click to expand...
Of course, I only live in Denver, so what would I know about the Nuggets? I suppose their 3-1 in-season advantage over us was a fluke, especially considering our only win is when they sat Jokic, Murray and Milsap.

Look, I've been a Blazer fan since I knew what basketball was. My dad took me to the very first Blazer regular season game ever in Portland. I was one of the 12,666 on June 5, 1977. I have had NBA League Pass for as long as I've lived in Denver and don't miss watching the Blazers.

It's okay to admit another team is better. That's what the evidence says; better regular season record, better head-to-head, better conference record, etc. It doesn't mean they'll win the series. However, to think we played like garbage is to ignore how well they played defense against us. Some teams make you look like s***. Give the Chicken Nuggets their due.
 
maxiep said:
Of course, I only live in Denver, so what would I know about the Nuggets? I suppose their 3-1 in-season advantage over us was a fluke, especially considering our only win is when they sat Jokic, Murray and Milsap.

Look, I've been a Blazer fan since I knew what basketball was. My dad took me to the very first Blazer regular season game ever in Portland. I was one of the 12,666 on June 5, 1977. I have had NBA League Pass for as long as I've lived in Denver and don't miss watching the Blazers.

It's okay to admit another team is better. That's what the evidence says; better regular season record, better head-to-head, better conference record, etc. It doesn't mean they'll win the series. However, to think we played like garbage is to ignore how well they played defense against us. Some teams make you look like s***. Give the Chicken Nuggets their due.
Click to expand...
The Blazers defense was real bad. Thats not taking away from Denver, I respect them I think they've got good young talent and coaching. The Blazers could play better defense and still lose. I expect both teams to play better going forward.
 
Naturally aspirated engines are effected by altitude at 3-5% reductions in hp for every 1000 ft above sea level. At or near 5000 feet many carburated engines have to be re-jetted for proper air fuel mixture.
I used to spend time in Denver on a routine basis for nearly 40 years and I was a compulsive runner for years and boy could I feel the diff in stamina in Denver.
 
maxiep said:
Of course, I only live in Denver, so what would I know about the Nuggets? I suppose their 3-1 in-season advantage over us was a fluke, especially considering our only win is when they sat Jokic, Murray and Milsap.

Look, I've been a Blazer fan since I knew what basketball was. My dad took me to the very first Blazer regular season game ever in Portland. I was one of the 12,666 on June 5, 1977. I have had NBA League Pass for as long as I've lived in Denver and don't miss watching the Blazers.

It's okay to admit another team is better. That's what the evidence says; better regular season record, better head-to-head, better conference record, etc. It doesn't mean they'll win the series. However, to think we played like garbage is to ignore how well they played defense against us. Some teams make you look like s***. Give the Chicken Nuggets their due.
Click to expand...
All this is true.

Doesnt mean the Nuggets are better, because they arent.

It was a lot of unforced mistakes on offense and poor defense, not properly executing the defensive gameplan (according to the players).

Two of their wins in the regular season were o e possession games. 3 or 4 possessions go differently and we wouldve won 3. Doesnt nake anyone better. Were better than OKC and they swept us in the regular season.
 
BonesJones said:
All this is true.

Doesnt mean the Nuggets are better, because they arent.

It was a lot of unforced mistakes on offense and poor defense, not properly executing the defensive gameplan (according to the players).

Two of their wins in the regular season were o e possession games. 3 or 4 possessions go differently and we wouldve won 3. Doesnt nake anyone better. Were better than OKC and they swept us in the regular season.
Click to expand...
Wow. It's almost like you didn't read my post, but just reacted to the first sentence.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

KingSpeed
Blazers 2025-26 Resume
Replies
0
Views
46
KingSpeed
KingSpeed
GrandpaBlaze
Team Rankings
Replies
7
Views
365
Foxx
Foxx
SharpeScooterShooter
Forum Game Preseason Game #1 Predictions Game - Blazers vs Warriors, Wednesday, 10/08/25
Replies
11
Views
590
GrandpaBlaze
GrandpaBlaze
KingSpeed
Avdija finished 5th in fan voting!
2
Replies
32
Views
469
42N8Bounce
42N8Bounce
Pinwheel1
  • Featured
Trail Blazers gear up for legislative ask that would ‘guarantee’ team’s future in Portland
8 9 10
Replies
293
Views
5K
BigGameDamian
BigGameDamian

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top