Donald Trump's Top Priorities

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
3RA1N1AC said:
Fuck, in that case isn't Obamacare settled? :lol:
Click to expand...

Not at all the same thing. SCOTUS decided if congress has the power to force people to buy insurance or face a fine was in the congressional power to tax. And a few other similar challenges like sticking to the strict written text of the law. Abortion and gay marriage are civil rights.

The abortion position isn't consistent with his gay marriage position.
 
Denny Crane said:
Not at all the same thing. SCOTUS decided if congress has the power to force people to buy insurance or face a fine was in the congressional power to tax. And a few other similar challenges like sticking to the strict written text of the law. Abortion and gay marriage are civil rights.

The abortion position isn't consistent with his gay marriage position.
Click to expand...
I don't think it is consistent either but you can make a case that human life is different than marriage. I just don't think he made that case.
 
Chris Christie won't get appointed to the cabinet unless there is a position called Secretary of Bitch
 
KingAlbertoJrSpeed said:
I mean Christians hate gay people too but I don't want to ban them. Do you?
Click to expand...
No real Christian hates someone because they are gay. They may not agree with homosexuality, but they love them anyway. It's not their job to judge anyone.

Ironically you were trying to post how Christians are hateful, but just ended up typing a stereotypical hateful message yourself.
 
images-35.jpg

images-43.jpg
 

Attachments

  • images-35.jpg
    images-35.jpg
    12.3 KB · Views: 27
  • images-43.jpg
    images-43.jpg
    5.2 KB · Views: 27
1e8gzf.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 1e8gzf.jpg
    1e8gzf.jpg
    11.6 KB · Views: 27
KingAlbertoJrSpeed said:
What does that have to do with anything? It is unAmerican to ban a religion whether they like gay people or not. All my questions stand and you didn't answer any of them.
Click to expand...
We wouldn't be banning a religion, we'd be banning a group of people that are dangerous to our society. Letting them come in and pollute our country is crazy.
 
Rastapopoulos said:
The fact that you feel no shame at writing this is kind of terrifying in itself. And I say that as an atheist who thinks all religions are stupid.
Click to expand...

I'm in favor of keeping all idiots out, regardless of their religion. Our nation is full beyond capacity as it is. We don't need a bunch of neanderthals stumbling around gumming up the works.

The only legitimate reasons for our government to allow immigration into our country would be that we wanted it, and that our lives were improved by it. Neither has been a popular notion for several decades. 89% of Americans want better border security.

Our government is not a world government. It is not a mid-eastern government. Only Real Americans fund it and only Real Americans deserve it's many benefits.
 
Sinobas said:
You know what Muslims think about homosexuals? The vast majority of the Muslim world things you should be punished. In some countries in fact, polls asking of homosexuality should be punished as a crime get yes responses 100% of the time. There was a imam in Orlando calling for the dealth penalty for homosexuals. It's a horrendous and hateful religion. It's easy for you to try and be sanctimonous about it while you're not suffering from it.

Click to expand...


Hey, that's who PAID THE CLINTONS OVER $50,000,000.00 for "a meeting" with Bill Clinton.
 
jlprk said:
The U.S. has contained everyone without a physical wall for decades.

If you visit a Communist country, which is illegal, an FBI interview awaits your return, to decide what to do with you. If you aren't prosecuted or worse, you'll at least lose your job.

Republicans in Congress are stonewalling Obama's attempt to normalize relations with Cuba.
Click to expand...

Before LBJ, the US contained us all through reverse psychology. Free people never think of leaving.

Once JFK was eliminated, most intelligent people realized Ike's warning had become reality, but most people aren't intelligent.

The erosion of freedoms and basic rights has been constant and thoroughly effective. In public schools younger people aren't taught US History, the rights they used to have, the freedoms they used to enjoy, so they think they are free as can be. Immigrants have no clue what the word free means, so they gleefully accept small improvements in their previously wretched lives and call it freedom. All of this weakens the basic foundation our country was built on.
 
We are so screwed... not only is he not anti-establishment, he's skipping the middle man and just going straight to the lobbyists. Fucking awesome.
 
Rastapopoulos said:
Click to expand...


Ah yes. Because a British News Agency is a prime source of unbiased and fair reporting of US politics. Especially when it comes to Trump....they love the guy. And so does NBC, CNN, VOX, TYT, and ABC.

Jesus, the guy has barely even begun to put an Administration together. Let's calm down a little and wait and see.
 
Jade Falcon said:
Ah yes. Because a British News Agency is a prime source of unbiased and fair reporting of US politics. Especially when it comes to Trump....they love the guy. And so does NBC, CNN, VOX, TYT, and ABC.

Jesus, the guy has barely even begun to put an Administration together. Let's calm down a little and wait and see.
Click to expand...

The people he is picking is not encouraging. I could see a scenario where nobody is happy with him because he doesn't fulfill any of his promises.
 
Natebishop3 said:
The people he is picking is not encouraging. I could see a scenario where nobody is happy with him because he doesn't fulfill any of his promises.
Click to expand...

That's the thing. Washington is INFESTED with career politicians and corruption, so whom exactly is he supposed to pick? It's likely that ANYONE he picks is going to have a hand in the elitist cookie jar.
 
Jade Falcon said:
That's the thing. Washington is INFESTED with career politicians and corruption, so whom exactly is he supposed to pick? It's likely that ANYONE he picks is going to have a hand in the elitist cookie jar.
Click to expand...

If it was me, I would throw it open to regular people. Intelligent people who want to help the country. We don't need lobbyists or bank execs or career politicians. Those are the people who got us into this mess.
 
Natebishop3 said:
If it was me, I would throw it open to regular people. Intelligent people who want to help the country. We don't need lobbyists or bank execs or career politicians. Those are the people who got us into this mess.
Click to expand...

Yes, that's a nice theory that I could get behind. However, in practice, it just doesn't work that way. Otherwise, it would have been done before now.

The only reason Trump even got to where he is is because of a $10 Billion fortune. You HAVE to have money to make it in Washington. Period. That's just the way it is.

I don't like that any more than anyone else does. But there's a reason why the unwashed masses cannot just walk into the Capital and get hired.

That being said....since he has ties outside of Washington, it's those people whom I would be trying to push for key positions.

Except for Trey Gowdy. I REALLY want that guy to be AG. And Guliani to be COS.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top