It's not a conspiracy....the NBA is a business and if people think they don't do things to increase revenue every chance they get, they are not paying attention very well. Superstars are reffed differently, rookies are reffed differently, the Patrick Ewing draft had all sorts of inconsistencies about it, the Lakers and Suns shot insane amounts of FTs all of a sudden to turn the tides of series against Sacramento and Seattle.
None of those are conspiracies....they are just things that happened all with the advantage towards a larger market, the superstars and in the name of dollars in pockets. Same with Tim Donaghy being the ONLY ref to ever bet on games. Really? Refs weren't supposed to bet on anything at all or they would lose their jobs.. Then when an investigation was done after the Donaghy situation, they found that a majority of refs gambled in one way or another and not one of them lost their job as was the guideline.
I'm not a conspiracy buff at all but when they started looking at Draymond and what happened with LeBron (who was by far the instigator in that particular situation even though I think Green is an idiot) a couple of us talking about it immediately thought the same thing.....that he would finally be suspended because it was LeBron involved instead of someone like Steven Adams and that the series was about to be over in a route. No conspiracy....just an opinion based on how the NBA seems to operate and it ended up being spot on.
Read the following at your peril. It's easy to type this stuff, not so easy to edit it all once it gets out of hand in length. So yeah, you were warned.
All of those are conspiracy by the definition of the word if intentional. Some might be explained by human nature similar as the bias one might subconsciously have towards different races when hiring or reviewing resumes with distinctive names bla blah, that is standard knowledge.
Anyway, other than the betting which is more a human nature issue more so than a business pressure as you allude to, show me a single point of evidence where the refs or the owners or any higher up has put pressure to do the things you allege. Any proof will do. Not fishy officiating, but actual proof of intent.
The vagaries of officiating can alter a game and that would be a potent weapon for manipulation indeed. Just find me a whistleblower and not circumstantial evidence and conjecture like, "Businesses like to make money, so they will do anything to make money"
Predicting that Draymond would get suspended proves nothing regarding him hitting Lebron and therefore it was Lebrons status that caused the suspension. If some random like Shumpert was the one teabagging Draymond, he would have been suspended anyway. In my opinion, the microscope was on Draymond so sharply that any sort of possible flagrant call would be upgraded regardless of the victims star power. And not because of wanting the Warriors weaker so that the Cavs could get a game off of a hobbled team.
The Cavs spanked their opponents in the playoffs and not because of refs helping them. They were clearly the best in the east regardless of whether it was good for business or not. Warriors didn't need ref help vs their opponents either. 73 wins is not a matter of trying to create a story, those wins were earned. So the two ’best' teams made it to the finals which doesn't always happen, but more often than not it does which makes perfect sense.
So I am then supposed to believe that there are unwritten rules given to the refs and any other employee who might have some ability to alter the game that if you have a situation where you can "make us billionaires richer", that you have the green light to do so?
Please explain the reasonable logistics of the Draymond nut swipe for me.
1. Kiki gets a snapchat from Silver
2. Kiki convinces everyone ( whoever makes those decisions ) that Draymond needs to walk the plank
3. Draymond suspended...
So, if we assume it is like this, then minimum 2 people are in on it. If, however, Kiki took it upon himself to do the bidding of his overlords without a direct order for no other reason than him thinking " I bet the overlords want things to be this way" then this is lunacy and grasping at straws to fit your narrative.
Ref 43 or 34, I don't recall, that was watching up close the teabagging incident didn't call a foul on either of them for some unknown reason. Maybe he was in on the conspiracy, I mean the business plan. He knew that if he called a whistle on the take down on Lebron too soon that Lebron would be distracted and unable to pull off the "Nut drag crossover" thereafter, which was a clever plan designed by the Freemasons and Rosicrucians... Nvm, I'm tired...