Do you have anything to back that up?
I don't know about you, but I wouldn't lie to the FBI whether under oath or not.
This from the Washington Post:
"Were his lies
material, as required by the statute to which he pleaded guilty? Absolutely. For those of us who spent a professional lifetime as prosecutors and in the Justice Department, this is not a close call.
Had Flynn been asked his favorite ice cream flavor by FBI agents and told them it was vanilla when he preferred chocolate, that would be immaterial. But lying to the FBI about his conversation with a Russian diplomat, given his financial and other ties to Russia, in the wake of massive Russian interference in our 2016 election, and during an FBI counterintelligence investigation concerning Russia? That is material — plain and simple."
and
"...it might be helpful to make a partial list of those who seemingly thought Flynn’s lies were material just, as they say, for the record:
President Trump thought Flynn’s lies were material. He fired Flynn in 2017 for lying to Vice President Pence and tweeted that year that he
“had to fire General Flynn because he lied to the Vice President and the FBI.” White House chief of staff Reince Priebus, according to
special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s report, recalled that Trump was angry at Flynn for lying about the conversation he had with the Russian diplomat.
Vice President Pence thought Flynn’s lies were material, stating he knew at the time Flynn was fired that Flynn
“lied to me” and that “the president made the right decision [to fire] him.” It seems that Flynn’s lies were material to Trump and Pence."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...people-who-thought-flynns-lies-were-material/