Fire Stotts

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
blazerkor said:
One last time. Nine years with no wins past the second round of the playoffs. His tenure was already unprecedented and he looked like he had lost the team. How Stotts compares to Chauncey has no bearing whatsoever. He was here three seasons too long the way it was. It is lunacy that you say a coach who had never won a game past the second round should have been given a tenth year to try and do better. You are making the argument that we not only should have settled for a history making ninth season with that low of performance but you wanted a tenth season for the guy. We should not be the team with the lowest standards in the history of the game for our head coach but we were and we definitely shouldn't have doubled down on that with another season.
Click to expand...
I’m right. You’re wrong.
 
Tince said:
1000%

How ownership and people here could see the flawed logic behind seeing if it was a coaching issue first is such a head-sratcher to me.

I don't think Billups is awful, but giving a guy with 1 year assistant coaching experience a 5 year deal when your best players are in their prime should've been ownerships second red flag. Though I might've been wrong when I said a didn't think a new coach would make a significant difference; this is starting to feel significant.
Click to expand...
Exactly
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top