- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Messages
- 34,409
- Likes
- 43,895
- Points
- 113
Most likely, what posters identify as "bias" or "double-standards" on the mods' part is more a difference in perception. Two statements that one poster may view as comparable can be viewed by the mod as significantly disparate. I've had conversations--both public and private--with people telling me "if <statement x> is edited/deleted, then <statement y> should be too", when I saw them as on completely different levels, and explained my reasoning as to why (after which the poster still thought I was wrong, which happens). Occasionally the mods themselves diverge on what is and isn't a violation of the TOS.Hey, when the dude yells at me that i'm fucking clueless and you guys let it go, it feels like bias. Happens often that others are checked, but he isn't. I could see why he thinks he is special. You guys treat him special.
All good, but If you don't check him the same as others, then its obvious there is bias.
Often, reasonable people can disagree without it being as nefarious as some might make it out to be.
If you'd like to PM me with posts that you believe deserve to edited, but weren't, I'm always willing to review and edit/delete if it seems appropriate, or provide an explanation for why I wouldn't.


