Game Thread GAME# 11: GRIZZLIES @ BLAZERS - NOVEMBER 7, 2017 - TUESDAY, 7:00 (PST), NBCSNW

[BonesJones]

Guys look, i don't want so Sound like a hater. But this Team/Roster is crap. Our Offense is terrible to watch, we make stupid plays and to many stupid turnovers (a lot unforced). With this Schedule we should have a 8:3 record or 9:2, we can beat Teams Who probably will not make to the playoffs, but that's all. I am not High on nurkic, he is a Foul and turnover machine, has no bball Iq and shots under 50% in the paint. That's really bad for a center. He is not that good as everybody think imo. I would be happy if we can trade him and let Collins play at the Center. He is a smart Player, has more bball Iq, he can shot the 3 and is probably in 2 or 3 years the better rim protector than Nurkic is. I don't want Nurkic here anymore. He sucks, yeah we won some games since he is here, but we need a center who is Playing and not after 1! Fucking Minute on the bench. Dame unfortenatly sucks also from 3 this year. I am really looking Forward to make a cut with this roster cause we are pure mediocre

Is this the same troll who said we had NO CHANCE against OKC?

You lost credibility, and this whole post is making it worse.

 

[SlyPokerDog]

Is this the same troll who said we had NO CHANCE against OKC?

You lost credibility, and this whole post is making it worse.

Attack the post, not the person.

 

[BonesJones]

Attack the post, not the person.

I'm not attacking him. He lost credibility by claiming something that ultimately happened had "no chance to happen". How's that attacking him?

 

[BonesJones]

Exactly, you had Ed freakin Davis and Evan Turner going one on one 3 plays in a row to close the game out. The Blazers play like frantic pussies in those situations. Fuck this team.

It's on Stotts.

 

[Hobbesarable]

It's on Stotts.

Sports and credibility in a forum with anonymous people on the internet. Hahaha

 

[SlyPokerDog]

I'm not attacking him. He lost credibility by claiming something that ultimately happened had "no chance to happen". How's that attacking him?

You are attacking him. Your comment had nothing to do with what he posted but with him personally.

 

[THE HCP]

Looks like Donovan, Russ and PG13 all got $15K fine for complaining about the refs.

 

[SlyPokerDog]

Looks like Donovan, Russ and PG13 all got $15K fine for complaining about the refs.

We should start issuing fines.

$20 for not complaining about HCP!

 

[BonesJones]

You are attacking him. Your comment had nothing to do with what he posted but with him personally.

Yeah, the way he's portraying himself. Not anything of my doing...

 

[SlyPokerDog]

Yeah, the way he's portraying himself. Not anything of my doing...

Again, attack the post, not the poster.

Please.

 

[kjironman1]

We should start issuing fines.

$20 for not complaining about HCP!

Hey now attack the post not the poster... Just kidding

 

[BonesJones]

Again, attack the post, not the poster.

Please.

If he has a problem with my "personal attacks" (which weren't bad consider his trolling) then he needs to stop trolling!

 

[SlyPokerDog]

If he has a problem with my "personal attacks" (which weren't bad consider his trolling) then he needs to stop trolling!

LOL, no.

I'm asking you to stop.

I even said please.

 

[BonesJones]

LOL, no.

I'm asking you to stop.

I even said please.

You know how many times I hear someone question someone elses credibility on here? All the time. And you single out me for doing it in the case where it applies the most? Okay.

Hope you understand where I'm coming from.

 

[kjironman1]

You know how many times I hear someone question someone elses credibility on here? All the time. And you single out me for doing it in the case where it applies the most? Okay.

Hope you understand where I'm coming from.

Just rack it up MRH
Myopic Ramblings of a Hater
I swear i'll get that to catch on....
@Strenuus

 

[PtldPlatypus]

You know how many times I hear someone question someone elses credibility on here? All the time. And you single out me for doing it in the case where it applies the most? Okay.

Hope you understand where I'm coming from.

He's not a ref expected to see everything. He's a moderator who addresses issues as he comes upon and recognizes them. The fact that he's missed things in the past doesn't justify something that he's identifying as an issue now.

Is his request really all that unreasonable or difficult to acquiesce to? Is it really that hard to address a person's comments and not their character?

 

[kjironman1]

He's not a ref expected to see everything. He's a moderator who addresses issues as he comes upon and recognizes them. The fact that he's missed things in the past doesn't justify something that he's identifying as an issue now.

Is his request really all that unreasonable or difficult to acquiesce to? Is it really that hard to address a person's comments and not their character?

Oh Boy... Wait... Let me get the popcorn.

 

[BonesJones]

He's not a ref expected to see everything. He's a moderator who addresses issues as he comes upon and recognizes them. The fact that he's missed things in the past doesn't justify something that he's identifying as an issue now.

Is his request really all that unreasonable or difficult to acquiesce to? Is it really that hard to address a person's comments and not their character?

Is a lack of credibility based on his character or his posts though? His posts lack credibility, because of his post saying we had "no chance" at beating OKC. And his recent post wasn't helping that...

 

[kjironman1]

Is a lack of credibility based on his character or his posts though? His posts lack credibility, because of his post saying we had "no chance" at beating OKC. And his recent post wasn't helping that...

I guess beings i have kind of egged this on i should contribute.
Personally i think the post was ridiculous as was the post before the OKC game but really that is his opinion. Simply point out all the reasons that the POST is way off base and leave it at that. You will win the conversation in the end because of MRH

 

[Hobbesarable]

LOL, no.

I'm asking you to stop.

I even said please.

Banish him to the OregonLive Blazer forum for a while. Who knows, he might feel at home there.

 

[kjironman1]

Banish him to the OregonLive Blazer forum for a while. Who knows, he might feel at home there.

OK so what is your handle over there?

 

[Hobbesarable]

OK so what is your handle over there?

I left that shit hole long ago. You probably still post there, eh?

 

[SlyPokerDog]

OK so what is your handle over there?

Jet

 

[Hobbesarable]

Jet

Hahahahaha

 

[SlyPokerDog]

Hahahahaha

Cup?

 

[Hobbesarable]

Cup?

Those two deserve each other. Leave 'em there.

 

[H.C.]

I actually put the new guy on block after his most recent post.
As imo the way he posts makes him sound very, very young.

Makes me wonder, is there an age verification to become a member of s2? Might want to think about it @SlyPokerDog considering the topics that are in the OT section. Then the NSFW section.
I don't know how well age verifications do, as I'm sure they can be faked. But still. idk I'm rambling.

 

[SlyPokerDog]

I actually put the new guy on block after his most recent post.
As imo the way he posts makes him sound very, very young.

Makes me wonder, is there an age verification to become a member of s2? Might want to think about it @SlyPokerDog considering the topics that are in the OT section. Then the NSFW section.
I don't know how well age verifications do, as I'm sure they can be faked. But still. idk I'm rambling.

The OT section is the age verification. It attracts all the grumpy old people in the forum.

 

[MARIS61]

Exactly, you had Ed freakin Davis and Evan Turner going one on one 3 plays in a row to close the game out. The Blazers play like frantic pussies in those situations. Fuck this team.

Play Meyers!

 

[MARIS61]

The OT section is the age verification. It attracts all the grumpy old people in the forum.

I've met Dviss and he's more of a Denzel Washington as PFC Peterson than a Walter Mattheau as Lou Mozell.