illmatic99
formerly yuyuza1
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2008
- Messages
- 57,772
- Likes
- 56,293
- Points
- 113
FWIW, this is a great potential tank game.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But i support winning a title also. Just a different planI support to winning. I still believe. Fuck the draft, we have more than 20 games to player. Go blazers!
I don't want any of these draft prospects at this time. I want to trade our pick/picks and a player/players and get a needle mover at a position of need. The higher our pick, the better our chances of doing that.It's really hard to get excited about adding any of these draft prospects. Only a couple of them appear to be huge impact players. I know we have to build through the draft and I know that somewhere in this draft there are some future stars. Nonetheless every players whose highlight video has been linked here so far has yet to get me really excited. So I keep going back to the theory that a few draft positions won't make much difference but the fact we have multiple 1st round picks might.
But we still have a full month of March madness to change my mind. Although there is also a good chance that the tournaments will just further convince me that the draft is deep but not great. Maybe a lot of good players but not a lot of great players?
I either want us to make the playoffs, or get a top 9 pick.
Why?
There's a group of 9 players that are a cut above the rest: Fultz, Tatum, Jackson, Smith, Fox, Isaac, Monk, Ball, Markannen.
The other reason? I don't like the prospects that will go 10-14: Williams, Collins, Hartenstein, Rabb
Before Nurk....I wanted lottery...post Nurk signing....I want him to play in the playoffs for the first time in his career and win.
While I agree it is always better to have a higher pick, I guarantee you someone is going to go top 9 that isn't in your 9 top players. I don't think anyone (even scouts) pick the top 9 perfectly this early. That means someone is going to go at least 10 or later and we should have a shot at someone you like.I either want us to make the playoffs, or get a top 9 pick.
Why?
There's a group of 9 players that are a cut above the rest: Fultz, Tatum, Jackson, Smith, Fox, Isaac, Monk, Ball, Markannen.
The other reason? I don't like the prospects that will go 10-14: Williams, Collins, Hartenstein, Rabb
I either want us to make the playoffs, or get a top 9 pick.
Why? There's a group of 9 players that are a cut above the rest: Fultz, Tatum, Jackson, Smith, Fox, Isaac, Monk, Ball, Markannen.
The other reason? I don't like the prospects that will go 10-14: Williams, Collins, Hartenstein, Rabb
Wanna bet?While I agree it is always better to have a higher pick, I guarantee you someone is going to go top 9 that isn't in your 9 top players. I don't think anyone (even scouts) pick the top 9 perfectly this early. That means someone is going to go at least 10 or later and we should have a shot at someone you like.
somebody might want to turn up the heat and bring in some fans....not the human kindIt's like 60 something here and there is ice under the floor, players are slipping everywhere during shootaround!
nice try.....we all know college students are broke!Wanna bet?
So? I'm right, so that ain't no problem old man!nice try.....we all know college students are broke!
Wait, why is there ice under the court?
Wait, why is there ice under the court?
Disney on ice apparentlyGood question, since the NHL team in Minnesota plays at the Xcel Center.
Sure I will take that bet. At least one of your top 9 of Tatum, Jackson, Ball, Fultz, Smith, Isaac, Markannen, Fox, and Monk will go 10th or later. I don't want to take your money (I have been in College, it can be rough) though so lets bet something like winner gets to choose losers avatar for the whole season. Only stipulation is it can't be nudity or too highly inappropriate for the forum. We will let Sly be the judge.Wanna bet?
Tatum, Jackson, Ball, Fultz, and Smith are locks for the top 9.
The other 4: Isaac, Markannen, Fox, and Monk shouldn't fall either.
Markannen won't slip past Minnesota. They need shooting. They need a PF. He'd be a perfect fit in their lineup.
So the other 3 are a PG, SG, and SF.
The Knicks won't take anyone outside of those top 9 because they don't need a PF with Porzingas (so no Williams, Rabb, Collins Hartenstein, etc.) They need a PG to replace Rose, or even a starting SG like Monk. They could go for Isaac if they're trading Melo.
The Kings would have the 7th and 8th picks, and the last thing they need is more big men. They need a PG and a SF. No way they'd let Fox or Isaac slip past them. A young core of Fox/Hield/Isaac/Labissiere/WCS would be solid going forward.
