Harkless resolves after Crabbe decision?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
Matching Crabbe even with the large salary and trade kicker was a Fuck You move by Allen. I think he's effectively shut down the market on Harkless this summer.
 
I think he sign either the remaining cap space for 2 years or take the QO.
 
Just how long do other clubs have to make offers on restricted free agents? Is there any kind of time limit or is it until they are signed by their original team?
 
UKRAINEFAN said:
Just how long do other clubs have to make offers on restricted free agents? Is there any kind of time limit or is it until they are signed by their original team?
Click to expand...
I think the QO is on the table for as long as the team wants it to be. Harkless can't play a game with another team or us until he signs either the QO or an offer sheet.
 
Rhal said:
I think the QO is on the table for as long as the team wants it to be. Harkless can't play a game with another team or us until he signs either the QO or an offer sheet.
Click to expand...

I think he can take a year off and come back a UFA.

Didn't Josh Childress do that?
 
TBpup said:
FWIW....



Lakers and Nets have been rumored to be considering an offer for Harkless but nothing yet. Nets have a ton of cap space and no one to spend it on.
Click to expand...

Nets signing everyone to offer sheets...
 
I suspect he has an offer on the table from the Blazers who said "Here's our offer to you feel free to shop around" im guessing starting around $9mil.
 
Yeah I assume Harkless and his agent are stalling in the hope someone with some money gets around to offering him a nice contract.
I would not be in any hurry either.
 
The think is after Brooklyn and Philly nobody has more than about 13 to offer to start.
 
Here's who has what

BKN $31.5
PHI $21.2
DEN $21.2
PHÒ $14.6
MIL $13.4
MIN $13
UTA $8.9
iND $3.9
CHI $0.845

Most those teams are set at SF, at least in terms of having a player as good as Mo or better.
 
I'm being lazy.... I suspect the whole Harkless-Vaughn thing.... Vaughn was in Orlando while Harkless was there and didn't get any opportunity?
 
BKN - Maybe. If Harkless hates Vaughn then no.
PHI Probably not. They need shooters and have Simmons at SF.
DEN Probably not. They need shooters and have Gallo, Chandler, and Barton at SF.
PHÒ Maybe. They have Warren, Dudley, Chriss, and Bender as forwards. Booker could start at the 3.
MIL Nope. They desperately need shooting and Harkless would be too redundant.
MIN Nope. Name 1 good shooter on their team. You can't.
UTA Nope. They have Burks, Johnson, and Diaw off the bench at the 2, 3, and 4.
IND Not enough cash.
CHI Not enough cash.
 
Brooklyn already has 2 SF and bigger issues at other positions. As much as I like Hark he really didn't earn much more than a $10mil contract this year though he shows a ton of promise.
 
He might still wait another year to see whether someone gets him a better deal or not. Thing is he might not get that much playing time if we know for sure that he's departing next year (which will be certain if he takes QO).
 
Mediocre Man said:
Oh?
The plot thickens
Click to expand...

I think aminu+voleh or Davis could be on the way out for a power forward. We have a logjam of big guys right now but not really a clear cut rotation. I think Neil is probably looking to consolidate a little bit.
 
BonesJones said:
BKN - Maybe. If Harkless hates Vaughn then no.
PHI Probably not. They need shooters and have Simmons at SF.
DEN Probably not. They need shooters and have Gallo, Chandler, and Barton at SF.
PHÒ Maybe. They have Warren, Dudley, Chriss, and Bender as forwards. Booker could start at the 3.
MIL Nope. They desperately need shooting and Harkless would be too redundant.
MIN Nope. Name 1 good shooter on their team. You can't.
UTA Nope. They have Burks, Johnson, and Diaw off the bench at the 2, 3, and 4.
IND Not enough cash.
CHI Not enough cash.
Click to expand...

You sold me on all of this....... but Denver.

Gallinari is never healthy, I would think about trading him since they seem to be going younger. Plus he could play the PF spot at 6'10.Chandler also seems older than the rest of the team and they have often looked at trading him. I think Barton plays mostly SG for them.

Bottom line is I would not rule them out.
 
Pinwheel1 said:
You sold me on all of this....... but Denver.

Gallinari is never healthy, I would think about trading him since they seem to be going younger. Plus he could play the PF spot at 6'10.Chandler also seems older than the rest of the team and they have often looked at trading him. I think Barton plays mostly SG for them.

Bottom line is I would not rule them out.
Click to expand...
They have Gary Harris and Jamal Murray at SG.

They got Faried and Arthur at PF.

Then you have to fit in Gallo, Chandler, and Barton. I don't think you can do that as well as fit Harkless.
 
BonesJones said:
They have Gary Harris and Jamal Murray at SG.

They got Faried and Arthur at PF.

Then you have to fit in Gallo, Chandler, and Barton. I don't think you can do that as well as fit Harkless.
Click to expand...

If I am Denver, I have Murray as my back up PG and Barton as my SG with Harris.
Gallo is traded or moved to PF. (Arthur would sit)
Then I have Chandler and Harkless at SF.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Perspective --- Quick Story re. Crabbe/Leonard's Value...
Replies
18
Views
1K
tester551
tester551
Schilly
2017 Offseason: The Schilly Edition
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
Sinobas
Sinobas
Dan Marang
Potential Upside Profile: Allen Crabbe - Week 3 discussion topic
Replies
14
Views
2K
SlyPokerDog
SlyPokerDog
Boob-No-More
The Great Who can be Traded When Thread
Replies
27
Views
3K
Scalma
Scalma
SlyPokerDog
New Batum interview...
Replies
8
Views
1K
BBert
BBert

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top