TradeNurkicNow
piss
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2008
- Messages
- 5,197
- Likes
- 679
- Points
- 113
It's not like the candidates are even remotely similar in policies and ideas
They're both neoliberal capitalists so in the long term the results are the same

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's not like the candidates are even remotely similar in policies and ideas
I agree with Beast that Trump's Secret Service protection team is corrupt and incompetent.
They should be sweeping Mar a largo daily and none of them saw or reported boxes and boxes and boxes of Top Secret documents?
They should have been replaced after that.
They work for us, not the candidate. That candidate's protection is for us.
Thomas Matthew Crooks Had Donald Trump Signs in His Yard—Neighbor
https://www.newsweek.com/thomas-mat...n-yard-neighbor-assassination-attempt-1925678
Thomas Matthew Crooks Had Donald Trump Signs in His Yard—Neighbor
https://www.newsweek.com/thomas-mat...n-yard-neighbor-assassination-attempt-1925678
I didn’t read the article but did this guy really have his own house with a yard? Wasn’t he a 22 year old incel?Thomas Matthew Crooks Had Donald Trump Signs in His Yard—Neighbor
https://www.newsweek.com/thomas-mat...n-yard-neighbor-assassination-attempt-1925678
This is just a blatant lie. The building the assassin shot from was less sloped than the one where secret service snipers were placed on.
View attachment 65288
Melania would be my guess.
The list of who was in charge of Trumps security at the rally is down to two people. Mel Brooks, or, Quentin Tarantino.
My moneys on Mel.
Mel for Melania. Yes.
I agree with Beast that Trump's Secret Service protection team is corrupt and incompetent.
They should be sweeping Mar a largo daily and none of them saw or reported boxes and boxes and boxes of Top Secret documents?
They should have been replaced after that.
They work for us, not the candidate. That candidate's protection is for us.
People that knew him have been saying he leaned conservative, but wasn't overtly political. If this were politically motivated, where is the manifesto? No social media posts? It makes the shooting even that much more bizaare.
From the BBC:People that knew him have been saying he leaned conservative, but wasn't overtly political.
Maybe he was an old school conservative taken over by the spirit of John McCain
"I like people who weren't shot in the ear"Maybe he was an old school conservative taken over by the spirit of John McCain
Sigh.
"Channel 4 News can reveal that Thomas Crooks's, [the shooter's] father, the owner of the rifle that was used to shoot at Donald Trump, was held on a database and profiled by the former president's election campaign and identified by them as a strong Republican supporter, gun owner and hunter. The information was compiled as part of a secret Republican project to gather data on millions of gun owners across America and use it to target pro-gun messages in the run up to the 2016 election...We know they profiled them using secret computer models to identify likely gun owners and enthusiasts, and Mr. Crooks scored very highly, 0.99 out of 1 for being a gun owner and 0.95 out of one 1 being a hunter. In fact, out of more than 19,000 people in Bethel Park who were profiled, Mr. Crooks was in the top 20 and the database classified him as a strong GOP or Republican voter."
"Channel 4 News can reveal that Thomas Crooks's, [the shooter's] father, the owner of the rifle that was used to shoot at Donald Trump, was held on a database and profiled by the former president's election campaign and identified by them as a strong Republican supporter, gun owner and hunter. The information was compiled as part of a secret Republican project to gather data on millions of gun owners across America and use it to target pro-gun messages in the run up to the 2016 election...We know they profiled them using secret computer models to identify likely gun owners and enthusiasts, and Mr. Crooks scored very highly, 0.99 out of 1 for being a gun owner and 0.95 out of one 1 being a hunter. In fact, out of more than 19,000 people in Bethel Park who were profiled, Mr. Crooks was in the top 20 and the database classified him as a strong GOP or Republican voter."
"Channel 4 News can reveal that Thomas Crooks's, [the shooter's] father, the owner of the rifle that was used to shoot at Donald Trump, was held on a database and profiled by the former president's election campaign and identified by them as a strong Republican supporter, gun owner and hunter. The information was compiled as part of a secret Republican project to gather data on millions of gun owners across America and use it to target pro-gun messages in the run up to the 2016 election...We know they profiled them using secret computer models to identify likely gun owners and enthusiasts, and Mr. Crooks scored very highly, 0.99 out of 1 for being a gun owner and 0.95 out of one 1 being a hunter. In fact, out of more than 19,000 people in Bethel Park who were profiled, Mr. Crooks was in the top 20 and the database classified him as a strong GOP or Republican voter."
Was about to post this.
BTW, Jessica Tarlov was on Fox running down the list of things MAGA has done in the last few years that would be considered incitement of violence or violent acts against their political opponents. When she mentioned the hogtied Biden decal some MAGA are putting on the back of their trucks, Greg Gutfeld replied "Oh come on. That's hilarious."
OK.
I fucking cackled at the teeny tiny coat hangers thank you for this
Pew pew pew!! Eheheheheheheheheheheh bang bang kapow!The police must be from Uvalde cracked me up.
Isn't somebody coordinating this on rally day? Don't they verify everyone is in place prior to the candidate arriving?Source says the building Crooks shot from was supposed to have a officer on the roof, but they didn't show up. That makes sense, as we know security forces were stationed there, and it was a painfully obvious place for someone to be stationed. It might also explain why the secret service snipers were hesitant to fire. Did they think it might have been a local police officer?
But why did we get the "slope" lie?