strudwickisthebest
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2013
- Messages
- 3,242
- Likes
- 73
- Points
- 48
Typical Callahan missing a breakaway that could have iced the game
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
.There is a time and place when you have to...not when you have one of the worlds best goalies in his primeI just don't understand the mindset of gutting the team so that the Rangers can have some draft picks for the future.
Dump is not wrong. One of the reasons we are SC contenders year-in/year-out the past few years is because we held onto those late 1st, 2nd round picks that are crucial to having a deep team in today's cap era
JT Miller - 1st rd, 15th overall
Stepan - 2nd Rd
Kreider - 1st rd, 19th overall
Staal - 1st rd, 12th overall
we drafted Dubi and Anisimov in the 2nd round, which allowed us to trade for Nash/Brassard. Cally was a 4th rounder that we used to trade for MSL, who was huge in last year's playoffs when we went to the SCF's
If we had just given up those picks in trades for vets years ago we would not be where we are today, because those vets would have aged/declined or no longer be on the team
When you go in "all in, go for it mode" you better win a Cup soon because you will sooner or later hit a down slope. If you want your success to be sustainable you need to keep those picks to get the next wave of talented, affordable players to replace those that are aging or becoming too expensive.
Ok but you cant bitch and moan after you make those trades to say well we shouldn't be giving up the farm...you cant have it both ways...there is a point in time when all these middle to late picks just don't cut it against higher end talent which we do not get out of the draftDump is not wrong. One of the reasons we are SC contenders year-in/year-out the past few years is because we held onto those late 1st, 2nd round picks that are crucial to having a deep team in today's cap era
JT Miller - 1st rd, 15th overall
Stepan - 2nd Rd
Kreider - 1st rd, 19th overall
Staal - 1st rd, 12th overall
we drafted Dubi and Anisimov in the 2nd round, which allowed us to trade for Nash/Brassard. Cally was a 4th rounder that we used to trade for MSL, who was huge in last year's playoffs when we went to the SCF's
If we had just given up those picks in trades for vets years ago we would not be where we are today, because those vets would have aged/declined or no longer be on the team
When you go in "all in, go for it mode" you better win a Cup soon because you will sooner or later hit a down slope. If you want your success to be sustainable you need to keep those picks to get the next wave of talented, affordable players to replace those that are aging or becoming too expensive.
you can get away with an average to above average goalie when you have number 1 picks on your roster NOT NAMED NASHand honestly, having Henrik now doesn't mean once he's gone, or out of his prime, that we can't win anymore. The need for a top-flight goalie in order to win is long gone and we've seen you can win Cups with a less than great goalie.
It's easy to be an armchair QB now because the ultimate end result has not been realized. You can't blissfully ignore three ECF appearances in four years. Yes, they haven't gotten over the hump but it's not like they just went reckless for a one year chance at winning it all. They need to try and win with Lundqvist now. They have young guys here now that need to grow and produce. That being said you also need veterans. What the hell good would it be running out and trading Nash, Yandle, Talbot and half the team for draft picks? So maybe they get a chance to win in 2021?
You haven't paid attention to what i or Dump said. I completely acknowledged our 3 ECF's and said one of the reason we have been successful is because we held onto those late 1st / 2nd rd picks.
Dump is not advocating trading Nash/Yandle/Tablot for draft picks. He's saying trade them for NHL players PLUS picks/prospects
this is going back to a theme we've revisited a few times on this board...since the 05 lockout EVERY SINGLE CUP WINNER (minus the Wings) had at least one top 3 pick within the last few years that strongly contributed to their run. And it'll be true again this year, either with the Hawks or TB (Stamkos 1OA, Hedman 2OA).
We dont have that luxury. We need to get the talent somehow. There is a median like 31 has pointed out. You cant do this every year. But we stockpiled those late first/2nd guys, and now that they're contributing we've dumped a few first rounders to get that elite talent we need. Hasnt gotten us quite there yet but damn are we close.
Messiah, with all due respect what the hell are you talking about/smoking? Where am I acting like this team is complete garbage? I'm saying history shows you need world-class talent to win a cup along with a strong supporting cast. We got the strong supporting class through the guys you mentioned, all of whom I am very high on and are continuing to get better. To get the world class talent like Nash and St.Louis (which unfortunately didnt work out for us) we had to part with some first round picks, which I am perfectly fine doing.
Where did you pull this "the team is complete garbage" crap from?
I KNOW THEY HAVE TALENT. I'm not expecting any world class players to just "fall out of the sky," we have our talent in Nash (for better or for worse) and I'm making this argument to show why trading the first round pick to get a player like him was necessary. Without Nash, and St. Louis last year, this team would have been on the playoff bubble.
I'm not advocating for getting more superstars here, that isnt feasible. I'm saying why getting the ones we did was necessary. Read a little more carefully.