Politics Hillary is done

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

BARF!

"Warren falsely claimed Native American heritage when applying to teach at both the University of Pennsylvania Law School and Harvard Law School, and Harvard later cited her presence on staff as evidence of its faculty’s diversity. Warren claimed that she knew about her family’s alleged Indian heritage because a relative told her that her “papaw” had “high cheekbones, like all of the Indians do."

How the hell do you know if she isn't 1/32 Cherokee? Because some Right Wing Scott "playgirl" Brown website told you?
 
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/08/21/us-usa-election-clinton-emails-idUSKCN0QQ0BW20150821

Exclusive: Dozens of Clinton emails were classified from the start, U.S. rules suggest

While the department is now stamping a few dozen of the publicly released emails as "Classified," it stresses this is not evidence of rule-breaking. Those stamps are new, it says, and do not mean the information was classified when Clinton, the Democratic frontrunner in the 2016 presidential election, first sent or received it.

But the details included in those "Classified" stamps — which include a string of dates, letters and numbers describing the nature of the classification — appear to undermine this account, a Reuters examination of the emails and the relevant regulations has found.

The new stamps indicate that some of Clinton's emails from her time as the nation's most senior diplomat are filled with a type of information the U.S. government and the department's own regulations automatically deems classified from the get-go — regardless of whether it is already marked that way or not.


 
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/08/21/us-usa-election-clinton-emails-idUSKCN0QQ0BW20150821

Exclusive: Dozens of Clinton emails were classified from the start, U.S. rules suggest

While the department is now stamping a few dozen of the publicly released emails as "Classified," it stresses this is not evidence of rule-breaking. Those stamps are new, it says, and do not mean the information was classified when Clinton, the Democratic frontrunner in the 2016 presidential election, first sent or received it.

But the details included in those "Classified" stamps — which include a string of dates, letters and numbers describing the nature of the classification — appear to undermine this account, a Reuters examination of the emails and the relevant regulations has found.

The new stamps indicate that some of Clinton's emails from her time as the nation's most senior diplomat are filled with a type of information the U.S. government and the department's own regulations automatically deems classified from the get-go — regardless of whether it is already marked that way or not.


I hope they hem her ass up.
 
The truth comes out in drip drip drip fashion. And each time, it contradicts what she's claimed previously.

I'm fine with a woman or hispanic or black president. Just not her.
 
I dread a Hillary campaign if she gets the nomination...it'll be like groundhog day for spin doctors. There's just too much baggage no matter what she says. I still have no candidate I can honestly support at this point. It's an ugly field
 
I dread a Hillary campaign if she gets the nomination...it'll be like groundhog day for spin doctors. There's just too much baggage no matter what she says. I still have no candidate I can honestly support at this point. It's an ugly field
Oh I have no problem. I am not voting for Clintion. I sure don't want to vote for Bush and won't unless it is Bush or Clinton on the final choice.
Anybody else will do except that socialist.
 
My biggest fear is Hillary vs Trump

If this happens our electorate is too stupid for words, and Idiocracy is no longer a comedic fallacy.

If we're that dumb, then we'll be electing President Camacho or some former Disney channel/Real Housewives of whogivesfuck star in the not so distant future anyway.
 
If this happens our electorate is too stupid for words, and Idiocracy is no longer a comedic fallacy.

If we're that dumb, then we'll be electing President Camacho or some former Disney channel/Real Housewives of whogivesfuck star in the not so distant future anyway.
Operation president Kardashain is set for 2024.
 
How the hell do you know if she isn't 1/32 Cherokee? Because some Right Wing Scott "playgirl" Brown website told you?
Even if she IS 1/32nd Cherokee, how does that excuse the fact that she claimed she was a MINORITY professor? That right there is some bullshit.

So anyone with a spec of minority blood can be labeled a minority now? If that's the case 75+% of America can claim to be a minority now.
 
Even if she IS 1/32nd Cherokee, how does that excuse the fact that she claimed she was a MINORITY professor? That right there is some bullshit.

So anyone with a spec of minority blood can be labeled a minority now? If that's the case 75+% of America can claim to be a minority now.

The fact that you focus on that instead of what she could do as a candidate speaks volumes.
 
Last edited:
Even if she IS 1/32nd Cherokee, how does that excuse the fact that she claimed she was a MINORITY professor? That right there is some bullshit.

So anyone with a spec of minority blood can be labeled a minority now? If that's the case 75+% of America can claim to be a minority now.

Scott Brown tried to follow that line of reasoning. What happened to him?
 
Trump gets my vote if that happens. I would still vote trump if Jeb Bush wins republican primaries. Only way I don't vote trump is if Bernie wins the dem primary

Can I ask why you feel that way? You'd vote for the candidate that appeals most to the insurgent far right, unless you're able to vote for the guy who appeals most to the socialist far left?
 
Is Trump really "far right?"

He's no socialist, but he is statist and pro choice.
 
Is Trump really "far right?"

He's no socialist, but he is statist and pro choice.

Donald Trump isn't anything. He's a loud attention whore, who says dumb shit for as much attention as possible. The largest block of people who would vote for him in a Republican primary are part of the insurgent far right, yes.
 
Donald Trump isn't anything. He's a loud attention whore, who says dumb shit for as much attention as possible. The largest block of people who would vote for him in a Republican primary are part of the insurgent far right, yes.
No quite right. His support is broadly based. He's popular across the board with republicans, including moderates expected to back Bush.

In fact, many support him because he's challenging entrenched institutions and dogma. That's quite liberal when you get right down to it. Heck, hippies violently protested the '68 convention, exactly to rebel against entrenched institutions and dogma.
 
No quite right. His support is broadly based. He's popular across the board with republicans, including moderates expected to back Bush.

In fact, many support him because he's challenging entrenched institutions and dogma. That's quite liberal when you get right down to it. Heck, hippies violently protested the '68 convention, exactly to rebel against entrenched institutions and dogma.

What is he challenging exactly? Not being PC? The calling card for assholes who are mad that they have repercussions for being assholes? He exists by being a wealthy celebrity, loudly fueling spiteful xenophobia and slinging dumbed down rhetoric to a dumbed down populace.
 
Can I ask why you feel that way? You'd vote for the candidate that appeals most to the insurgent far right, unless you're able to vote for the guy who appeals most to the socialist far left?
I want drastic change. I'm tired of the last 20 years from politicians that straddle the fence and give false promises
 
I want drastic change. I'm tired of the last 20 years from politicians that straddle the fence and give false promises

I understand, but it's odd to see someone say they'd be ok to be in two completely different political boats.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top