Hollinger assesses each team in the new CBA

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Nikolokolus

There's always next year
Joined
Sep 19, 2008
Messages
30,704
Likes
6,198
Points
113
The article is an ESPN insider piece, but here's a snippet on the Blazers:

How it helps: The Blazers receive a get-out-of-jail free card for the unexpectedly disastrous Brandon Roy contract, providing 100 percent cap and tax relief for what looked to be the worst contract this side of Gilbert Arenas.

How it hurts: Paul Allen can't just go buying draft picks all willy-nilly now that there's a $3 million annual maximum that teams can include in trades. Also, it would have helped if they had selected a GM at some point in the half-year between firing their last one and the end of the lockout.

Immediate impact (this season): Buh-bye Brandon, most likely. The Blazers won't be able to use their full midlevel exception, take advantage of sign-and-trades and re-sign Greg Oden unless they cut Roy loose. Plus, they save themselves a luxury-tax hit in the process. All that makes Portland one of the few teams likely to use its amnesty immediately.

Note that although the MLE is less than before (a max of four years, $22.5 million), keeping that and the biannual exceptions are big for the Blazers, as they've been one of the league's heaviest users of each.

Long-term impact (future seasons): A more punitive luxury tax and penalties for repeat offenders likely either limits or entirely eliminates the so-called "SPAM" method (Spend Paul Allen's Money) the team used to build rosters in the past. It will take more than brute financial force for Allen to win his long-coveted ring.

http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/7291975/how-new-cba-affects-every-nba-team
 
So in other words, Portland is completely fucked and shouldn't even bother trying to compete (see: Milwaukee Bucks).
 
Fool. He has no idea we will never use that on Roy. Especially with Nate part of the decision making
 
I think he is an idiot. If he wrote this 5-6 years ago he may be right. But his theory is off.

Buying extra draft picks helped us maybe one year. So I can't see how it can hurt us because it rarely helped us.

Lots of teams rely on the Full MLE every year. So no advantage or dis-advantage.

And over the last few years they have not been very far (if at all) over the luxory tax. And over the last 5 years they have certainly not tried to build the roster with money. I gues Paul's money did help secure the Wallace trade, but the salaries still matched.

The bottom line if Paul wants to "SPAM" himself to build a roster, by going over the luxory tax, he is one of a few who actually still can. So wouldn't the new rules be to his favor. It is all moot because he hasn't for a few years. The total salary is right in line with most teams.

I do not see how the new CBA hurts us more than say the Lakers. At least that's how they feel down here in SoCal.
 
PA was in favor of the "hardline" in negotiations, in order to make harsher penalties for teams to spend money, so that he will be the only one who will be able to do so

science
 
Wow it's been almost a year since I been around these parts... (pause for applause)
Thank you.

The Blazers won't be able to use their full midlevel exception, take advantage of sign-and-trades and re-sign Greg Oden unless they cut Roy loose.

First I've heard they can't resign Greg unless Roy is cut. That doesn't sound right. Can someone confirm or deny that?
 
He doesn't know what he's talking about. We can keep Roy and Oden.
 
Wow it's been almost a year since I been around these parts... (pause for applause)
Thank you.



First I've heard they can't resign Greg unless Roy is cut. That doesn't sound right. Can someone confirm or deny that?

Yes. I can confirm or deny that. But I'm not going to.

he Blazers won't be able to use their full midlevel exception, take advantage of sign-and-trades and re-sign Greg Oden unless they cut Roy loose.

Note it says 'and' rather than 'or'.

barfo
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top