rocketeer
Active Member
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2003
- Messages
- 3,250
- Likes
- 20
- Points
- 38
i disagree. the rockets were 3rd in the west in point differential at +4(portland was 2nd at +5.3). i don't think it would be humiliating at all for the 2nd best team in the west to lose to the 3rd best team in 6 games. and when you factor in that houston was much better in the 2nd half of the season than the 1st(once tmac stopped playing) it becomes even less so(even with the blazers playing well at the end too). it was just an unfortunate case of the 2nd and 3rd best teams having to play each other in the first round. one of them had to lose and they weren't going to be happy about it.If you believe him, then it makes the first-round loss to Houston much more humiliating. We should've creamed those guys.
i disagree there as well. are you suggesting the blazers being young had nothing to do with opponents shooting free throws better against them? i could be see there being some correlation to young teams being more inconsistent in their point differential(having more blowout wins but also more blowout losses) but i think over the course of the season that should mostly even itself out.I'd wager that in the future if some other team assembles this much young talent, they'll appear to be similarly "unlucky" too.

