How Donald Trump Bankrupted His Atlantic City Casinos, but Still Earned Millions

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

I'll read it, but the NYtimes already got their asses handed to them on a fake tabloid story about Trump before. And... Their pundits on CNN, Fox and MSNBC made it perfectly clear they do not like Trump, nor plan on ever pushing positive press about him. Just FYI
 
“People underestimated Donald Trump’s ability to pillage the company,”

All you've got to do is change company to country, Mags, and you've got your vision of the future.

barfo
 
I'll read it, but the NYtimes already got their asses handed to them on a fake tabloid story about Trump before. And... Their pundits on CNN, Fox and MSNBC made it perfectly clear they do not like Trump, nor plan on ever pushing positive press about him. Just FYI
The thing about you Trump supporters is you justify whatever Trump does or says through the premise of "The news hates him" or "The news is overreacting"
 
"pillaging"

It's rather funny reading a sad tale about Trump pillaging the Casinos of Atlantic City. Taking Harrah's for ride! Sounds pretty hard but I guess he did it.
 
Last edited:
"pillaging"

It rather funny reading a sad tale about Trump pillaging the Casinos of Atlantic City. Taking Harrah's for ride! Sounds pretty hard but I guess he did it.

It's not Harrah's he took for a ride.
 
It's not Harrah's he took for a ride.

Really?

"Harrah’s agreed to provide Mr. Trump, who did not put any additional money into the deal, with $220 million in financing to build the project, to pay him a $24 million construction management fee and to give him half the profits."

"The following year, Harrah’s scuttled its partnership with Mr. Trump and sold him its stake in Trump Plaza for more than $220 million."

Seems like some sort of ride.
 
Seems like Steve Young got a ride with Trump and some football league about this time. 40 million or so for Young?
 
The thing about you Trump supporters is you justify whatever Trump does or says through the premise of "The news hates him" or "The news is overreacting"
Um, well even the liberal media actually called out the NY Times for their blatant hit pieces on Trump. Sorry, fail...

Also, WAPO hired 20 reporters to investigate only on Trump. Guess how many are assigned to Hillary? 2... So come again???
 
Um, well even the liberal media actually called out the NY Times for their blatant hit pieces on Trump. Sorry, fail...

Also, WAPO hired 20 reporters to investigate only on Trump. Guess how many are assigned to Hillary? 2... So come again???
You do realize that the NY Times is only one news source right?

One news source is trying to hurt Trump's image and one is investigating him more than Hilary. Okay, wow! ... You're using these very specific instances to try to justify the common Trump supporter claims that the bad press he gets from almost every major news source is because the news has it out for him. You Trump supporters deflect away the truth, which is that they're simply reporting the shit he says, and it's bad press because the shit he says is racist, sexist, stupid as hell, and insane. We're talking about media as a whole here. Analogy: If there's 100 apples on an apple tree, and you comb through the whole tree and find 2 that are bad, that doesn't mean all the apples are bad.

You're a common Trump supporter. Likely, you're really easy to argue with because it's easy to apply basic logic against the skewed viewpoints you have, but you're also really hard to argue with because you don't see the logic

which is exactly why you support Trump...
 
You do realize that the NY Times is only one news source right?

One news source is trying to hurt Trump's image and one is investigating him more than Hilary. Okay, wow! ... You're using these very specific instances to try to justify the common Trump supporter claims that the bad press he gets from almost every major news source is because the news has it out for him. You Trump supporters deflect away the truth, which is that they're simply reporting the shit he says, and it's bad press because the shit he says is racist, sexist, stupid as hell, and insane. We're talking about media as a whole here. Analogy: If there's 100 apples on an apple tree, and you comb through the whole tree and find 2 that are bad, that doesn't mean all the apples are bad.

You're a common Trump supporter. Likely, you're really easy to argue with because it's easy to apply basic logic against the skewed viewpoints you have, but you're also really hard to argue with because you don't see the logic

which is exactly why you support Trump...
Not just nytimes. CNN is a 24/7 trump hate fest. I think trump is going to have to weather a withering massive attack by the media if he's going to win.

See SPDs recent thread, citing a propaganda piece that suggests everyone should dump trump, vote Hiliar, because a handful of republicans don't like him. It's old news spun as new news. The stop trump movement among republicans like Krystol was going on when Rubio was still in the race.'

The stories about trump facing an impossible task to overcome electoral college slam dunk for Hiliar.

Yet Pennsylvania is one of those states they're counting as a slam dunk for Hiliar.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2016/06/17/trumps_keys_to_the_keystone_state_130908.html

And:

http://heavy.com/news/2016/06/penns...onald-trump-vs-hillary-clinton-match-up-race/
 
You do realize that the NY Times is only one news source right?

One news source is trying to hurt Trump's image and one is investigating him more than Hilary. Okay, wow! ... You're using these very specific instances to try to justify the common Trump supporter claims that the bad press he gets from almost every major news source is because the news has it out for him. You Trump supporters deflect away the truth, which is that they're simply reporting the shit he says, and it's bad press because the shit he says is racist, sexist, stupid as hell, and insane. We're talking about media as a whole here. Analogy: If there's 100 apples on an apple tree, and you comb through the whole tree and find 2 that are bad, that doesn't mean all the apples are bad.

You're a common Trump supporter. Likely, you're really easy to argue with because it's easy to apply basic logic against the skewed viewpoints you have, but you're also really hard to argue with because you don't see the logic

which is exactly why you support Trump...
Yes, I am fully aware they are. But since the initial post I made, referring to the OG thread "New York Times," my argument is completely valid.

I get it buddy... You dislike Trump. I don't mind that you have opposing views. But if you want to pawn the liberal media isn't out to get Trump, I got an igloo to sell you in Arizona. It's got 2 bedrooms yo!
 
Not just nytimes. CNN is a 24/7 trump hate fest.

You, on the other hand, are a 24/7 hillary hate fest. So I'm not sure you can really throw stones.

barfo
 
Not just nytimes. CNN is a 24/7 trump hate fest. I think trump is going to have to weather a withering massive attack by the media if he's going to win.

See SPDs recent thread, citing a propaganda piece that suggests everyone should dump trump, vote Hiliar, because a handful of republicans don't like him. It's old news spun as new news. The stop trump movement among republicans like Krystol was going on when Rubio was still in the race.'

The stories about trump facing an impossible task to overcome electoral college slam dunk for Hiliar.

Yet Pennsylvania is one of those states they're counting as a slam dunk for Hiliar.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2016/06/17/trumps_keys_to_the_keystone_state_130908.html

And:

http://heavy.com/news/2016/06/penns...onald-trump-vs-hillary-clinton-match-up-race/

I have never supported or told anyone to vote for Hillary.
 
You, on the other hand, are a 24/7 hillary hate fest. So I'm not sure you can really throw stones.

barfo
It's a tough job, but someone has to do it.

 
That 88gb is supposed to be all of Hiliar's emails, clearly obtained by a hack that never happened.
 
That 88gb is supposed to be all of Hiliar's emails, clearly obtained by a hack that never happened.

88gb of email? that seems like a lot for Hillary. I have all my emails going back to the early 90s, and they don't quite add up to that much.

Maybe she attaches porn to all her emails, who knows.

barfo
 
Yes, I am fully aware they are. But since the initial post I made, referring to the OG thread "New York Times," my argument is completely valid.

I get it buddy... You dislike Trump. I don't mind that you have opposing views. But if you want to pawn the liberal media isn't out to get Trump, I got an igloo to sell you in Arizona. It's got 2 bedrooms yo!
You're missing the boat here. But go ahead, focus more on the media instead of the shit your candidate says.
 
Not just nytimes. CNN is a 24/7 trump hate fest. I think trump is going to have to weather a withering massive attack by the media if he's going to win.

See SPDs recent thread, citing a propaganda piece that suggests everyone should dump trump, vote Hiliar, because a handful of republicans don't like him. It's old news spun as new news. The stop trump movement among republicans like Krystol was going on when Rubio was still in the race.'

The stories about trump facing an impossible task to overcome electoral college slam dunk for Hiliar.

Yet Pennsylvania is one of those states they're counting as a slam dunk for Hiliar.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2016/06/17/trumps_keys_to_the_keystone_state_130908.html

And:

http://heavy.com/news/2016/06/penns...onald-trump-vs-hillary-clinton-match-up-race/
You're acting like the news coverage on Trump is unfair.

<Insert racist Trump comment here>
<Resulting Media Backlash>
<Trump Supporter: The media is slamming Trump! They're trying to stop him!>

No shit they're trying to stop him. The dude is a lunatic...
 
88gb of email? that seems like a lot for Hillary. I have all my emails going back to the early 90s, and they don't quite add up to that much.

Maybe she attaches porn to all her emails, who knows.

barfo

60,000+ emails with attachments. I doubt you have many, but I'm pretty sure the classified material about to be released has all sorts of satellite photos, reports, etc.

An email itself might be 2,000 bytes. The attachments might be 100MB each.
 
You're acting like the news coverage on Trump is unfair.

<Insert racist Trump comment here>
<Resulting Media Backlash>
<Trump Supporter: The media is slamming Trump! They're trying to stop him!>

No shit they're trying to stop him. The dude is a lunatic...

It's not their job to stop him. It's to report the news without bias.
 
It's a tough job, but someone has to do it.

Sure, just like someone had to protest the funerals in Orlando.

The question is, why are you that someone in this case?

What is it that offends you about Hillary that doesn't offend you about Trump, that you spend all your energy on her and not him? I understand of course that you support neither of them... but your lack of support for Hillary seems a lot more vigorous than your lack of support for Trump, to the point that you seem to be defending him now.

barfo
 
The stories about trump facing an impossible task to overcome electoral college slam dunk for Hiliar.

Yet Pennsylvania is one of those states they're counting as a slam dunk for Hiliar.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2016/06/17/trumps_keys_to_the_keystone_state_130908.html

And:

http://heavy.com/news/2016/06/penns...onald-trump-vs-hillary-clinton-match-up-race/

Ok, so let's give you the fantasy of flipping PA to Trump. Why you would fantasize about that is beyond understanding, but to each his own perversions.

What else are you going to flip? PA alone doesn't do it. If that's your best shot, it's still a long shot...

barfo
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top