Politics Project 2025/Agenda 47/Behind the Curtain: Trump allies pre-screen loyalists for unprecedented power

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Applicants for positions in law enforcement and intelligence are being asked two questions. True or false.

Did Trump win 2020 election?
Was 2017 inauguration largest crowd ever?

Both are demonstrably false but applicants are not considered unless they say true.

These are not political appointments, they are the people who do day to day work on the ground. And it is demanded they turn backs on facts to avoid hurting Trump's ego.

Link?
 
How many of these talking points come directly from the organizers of Project 25? The stated goal on their website is to get people into administrative positions that support conservative views and the Trump agenda. That's kind of what elections are about.

Contrast this to the way lefty's called for anyone supporting Trump to be fired and to be blacklisted from every working again. The left does things then wrings it's hands at the idea that the right might do the same. Total projection.

https://www.project2025.org/about/about-project-2025/
LMAO good one
 
You guys realize this has nothing to do with Trump right? It’s some conservative lobbying group coming g up with a bunch of bad ideas they would like to lobby for. You guys sound like conspiracy freaks. Its a giant nothing burger.

When will leftists figure out that when EVERYTHING is the end of the world, nothing is the end of the world. Just sound like hypochondriac babies.
Giant nothing burger, you’re funny John
 
I definitely think you had undercover FBI agents that tried to spur the nonsense that happened that day.

Ok. Please explain why that makes any sense whatsoever. What's the motivation?

That doesn't mean there weren't also Trump enthusiasts who took part and needed to be prosecuted.

Plenty of FBI agents ARE Trump enthusiasts. There might have been some of those 'undercover' at the riot, yes.

barfo
 
Ok. Please explain why that makes any sense whatsoever. What's the motivation?

This can't be that hard to figure out. The establishment obviously hates him. By egging on what happened, they thought Trump would forever be out of the picture. It should have.

Plenty of FBI agents ARE Trump enthusiasts. There might have been some of those 'undercover' at the riot, yes.

barfo

Where are you getting this from? It's far more likely that the majority of the agency despises him and wants the country to return back to "normal."
 
This can't be that hard to figure out. The establishment obviously hates him. By egging on what happened, they thought Trump would forever be out of the picture. It should have.

That doesn't make a lot of sense. Trump was due to be out of office in a few days. Are you saying the establishment thought there was a significant chance that he'd run again in 2024 and be reelected, and at the same time, thought there was a significant chance that if they helped incite a riot, that Trump would be impeached for it and barred from office?

That seems like a mighty big stretch.

Plus, there's been hundreds of cases, thousands of hours of testimony, pages and pages of documentation, video, etc. etc. and there's never been any evidence found that undercover FBI agents were involved. None.

The closest anyone has come up with is that some of the losers in the crowd had been paid as FBI informants.

Since the Trumpists have seized control of the FBI, if there was any real evidence, don't you think they'd have produced it by now?

You are going way out of your way to believe in a conspiracy theory promoted by Trump and his enablers in order to minimize Jan 6th.

Where are you getting this from? It's far more likely that the majority of the agency despises him and wants the country to return back to "normal."

Lots of law enforcement types supported him then, and lots presumably still do. Plus, the political leadership of the FBI at the time was appointed by Trump.

barfo
 
That doesn't make a lot of sense. Trump was due to be out of office in a few days. Are you saying the establishment thought there was a significant chance that he'd run again in 2024 and be reelected, and at the same time, thought there was a significant chance that if they helped incite a riot, that Trump would be impeached for it and barred from office?

That seems like a mighty big stretch.

Plus, there's been hundreds of cases, thousands of hours of testimony, pages and pages of documentation, video, etc. etc. and there's never been any evidence found that undercover FBI agents were involved. None.

The closest anyone has come up with is that some of the losers in the crowd had been paid as FBI informants.

Since the Trumpists have seized control of the FBI, if there was any real evidence, don't you think they'd have produced it by now?

You are going way out of your way to believe in a conspiracy theory promoted by Trump and his enablers in order to minimize Jan 6th.



Lots of law enforcement types supported him then, and lots presumably still do. Plus, the political leadership of the FBI at the time was appointed by Trump.

barfo

We have law enforcement on video inviting multiple protestors into the Capitol. Where was the investigation into any of it other than singling out Trumpsters. Where is the law enforcement who invited them in? Are they still working there?

I thought this long before Trump or anyone on the right put this out there. I know your natural instinct is to believe in everything the establishment says, but the lack of transparency is reason to doubt the official story. Entrapment and forms of it is how the FBI operates. Look up how many mentally ill "Muslims" they put behind bars after 9/11 via these means.

I'm trying to minimize January 6th? It's consistently apparent you have no idea what you're talking about. I think all of those people should be behind bars and it should have stopped Trump from ever taking office again.

Your accusations are about to get you blocked. It's really quite tiring having you assume my psychology when they couldn't be further from the truth. I'm sorry nuance is a difficult concept for you to understand, but you can't keep making it my problem.
 
Last edited:
We have law enforcement on video inviting multiple protestors into the Capitol. Where was the investigation into any of it other than singling out Trumpsters. Where is the law enforcement who invited them in? Are they still working there?

I thought this long before Trump or anyone on the right put this out there. I know your natural instinct is to believe in everything the establishment says, but the lack of transparency is reason to doubt the official story. Entrapment and forms of it is how the FBI operates. Look up how many mentally ill "Muslims" they put behind bars after 9/11 via these means.

I'm trying to minimize January 6th? It's consistently apparent you have no idea what you're talking about. I think all of those people should be behind bars and it should have stopped Trump from ever taking office again.

Your accusations are about to get you blocked. It's really quite tiring having you assume my psychology when they couldn't be further from the truth. I'm sorry nuance is a difficult concept for you to understand, but you can't keep making it my problem.
You're wrong. I don't think you can block a mod.
 
I thought this long before Trump or anyone on the right put this out there.

That's fine, I didn't say that you were taking cues from them. Just that your belief and their (suppposed) beliefs line up.

I'm trying to minimize January 6th?

No, that wasn't what I was saying. I was saying Trump and his people are promoting the conspiracy theory in order to minimize Jan 6.

barfo said:
You are going way out of your way to believe in a conspiracy theory promoted by Trump and his enablers in order to minimize Jan 6th.

You assumed that the last clause applied to you rather than Trump. That was an incorrect assumption.

Your accusations are about to get you blocked. It's really quite tiring having you assume my psychology when they couldn't be further from the truth. I'm sorry nuance is a difficult concept for you to understand, but you can't keep making it my problem.

You misread my post. You are the one making assumptions here, not me. I didn't post or assume anything about your psychology.

barfo
 
We have law enforcement on video inviting multiple protestors into the Capitol. Where was the investigation into any of it other than singling out Trumpsters. Where is the law enforcement who invited them in? Are they still working there?

I thought this long before Trump or anyone on the right put this out there. I know your natural instinct is to believe in everything the establishment says, but the lack of transparency is reason to doubt the official story. Entrapment and forms of it is how the FBI operates. Look up how many mentally ill "Muslims" they put behind bars after 9/11 via these means.

I'm trying to minimize January 6th? It's consistently apparent you have no idea what you're talking about. I think all of those people should be behind bars and it should have stopped Trump from ever taking office again.

Your accusations are about to get you blocked. It's really quite tiring having you assume my psychology when they couldn't be further from the truth. I'm sorry nuance is a difficult concept for you to understand, but you can't keep making it my problem.

Why won't you admit Obama did 9/11?
 
GRvET5mX0AEMSzb
 
Holy shit, didn't even make it past the first page, and some of these posts really didn't age well.
 
One can only hope that all those generals who watched that shitshow Trump and his trained monkey put on understand that these guys are the real enemy within
 
Back
Top