- Joined
- May 24, 2007
- Messages
- 73,117
- Likes
- 10,950
- Points
- 113
Why derail this thread with your confused posts?Why not complain about that thread in that thread?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why derail this thread with your confused posts?Why not complain about that thread in that thread?
Sure, just like someone had to protest the funerals in Orlando.
The question is, why are you that someone in this case?
What is it that offends you about Hillary that doesn't offend you about Trump, that you spend all your energy on her and not him? I understand of course that you support neither of them... but your lack of support for Hillary seems a lot more vigorous than your lack of support for Trump, to the point that you seem to be defending him now.
barfo
Ok, so let's give you the fantasy of flipping PA to Trump. Why you would fantasize about that is beyond understanding, but to each his own perversions.
What else are you going to flip? PA alone doesn't do it. If that's your best shot, it's still a long shot...
barfo
I don't protest funerals in Orlando. You do like to make shit up.

I am equally offended by Trump. I don't post anything in support of him. Fuck him.
At best, I think Trump would be incompetent an just do not much for 4 years. I'm fine with that from ANYONE.
At worst, I think Hiliar is going to do some real damage. Ask the people of Libya about the damage she did there.
It's not my best shot. It just flies in the face of the narrative by the press. You know, that she starts with 240 EVs. She starts with 240 EVs minus PA minus a few others, no doubt. That is, if her map really is the same as Obama's. She's no Obama.
??? I didn't say you protested funerals. I merely implied that you were as disgraceful as Westboro Baptist, that's all
Oh really?
You are fine with Trump. Got it. Yeah, "fuck him, but I'm fine with him".
I'll be sure to do that.
barfo
I'm fine with republicans refusing to let Trump get his agenda passed should he be elected.
I'm not for either of the two candidates. I don't see either as the lesser of two evils. This is the worst election choice in my lifetime.
The polls don't say she has 240 EVs. They say Trump is behind by 47 EVs. If he wins PA, it's more like 27, which is hardly insurmountable considering there would be 143 EVs up for grabs.
Sure. You should presumably also be fine with republicans refusing to let Clinton get her agenda passed should she be elected. Right? It's probably more likely that republicans will obstruct Clinton than they will obstruct Trump.
So I ask again, why is your commentary on the election so one-sided? Shouldn't you be attacking both equally?
barfo
He's within 5 in enough statesSure, and if he wins every state, then he'll have 538. No problem then.
The trouble is, he's behind in pretty much every state other than the ones Romney won. And even some of Romney's states look shaky. Like Utah, for example.
And Romney didn't win anywhere near enough to get elected.
barfo
Sure, and if he wins every state, then he'll have 538. No problem then.
The trouble is, he's behind in pretty much every state other than the ones Romney won. And even some of Romney's states look shaky. Like Utah, for example.
And Romney didn't win anywhere near enough to get elected.
barfo
I would rather Trump pick the next two justices. Actually Johnson, but you're stuck on the notion of both.
He's within 5 in enough states
Romney didn't win PA.
None. But Trump is so bad, according to you and the media, he shouldn't be within 5 points in states "routinely" won by Obama. A number of the swing state polls are within 2; within the margin of error, or effectively a tie.How many electoral votes do you get for being within 5?
And neither will Trump, most likely.
barfo
Ok, thanks for clearing that up. I'll put you down as a Trump fan, since I don't think you are going to be able to get your Johnson up (to the 15% he needs to be in the debates).
Might be more than 2 justices, there was a bit today that Clarence Thomas is thinking of retiring after the election.
barfo
None. But Trump is so bad, according to you and the media, he shouldn't be within 5 points in states "routinely" won by Obama. A number of the swing state polls are within 2; within the margin of error, or effectively a tie.
Watch out for Jill Stein. If Sanders voters have any conviction behind their support for the man, they'll be voting for Stein.
because the polls are close-ish, that means he's got a shot at actually winning those states.
barfo
She may very well do better than in prior years. Color me not worried at all.
barfo
It's not their job to stop him. It's to report the news without bias.
http://www.truthdig.com/eartothegro..._for_hillary_clintons_acceptance_speech_in_ph
World’s Largest ‘Fart-In’ Is Planned for Hillary Clinton’s Acceptance Speech in Philadelphia
Philadelphia: Cheri Honkala, the leader of the Poor People’s Economic Human Rights Campaign, announced that her group was organizing the world’s largest “fart-in” to be held on July 28 at the Wells Fargo Center during Hillary Clinton’s anticipated acceptance speech for the Democratic nomination.
“We will be holding a massive bean supper for Bernie Sanders delegates on American Street in my Kensington neighborhood on the afternoon of July 28,” she said. “We are setting up a Clintonville there, modeled on the Hoovervilles of the 1930s where the poor and unemployed built shanty towns. The Sanders delegates, their bellies full of beans, will be able to return to the Wells Fargo Center and greet the rhetorical flatulence of Hillary Clinton with the real thing.”
Persuasion:
(By Scott Adams, creator of the Dilbert comic strip)
Ralph Nader made your kind think differently in 2000.
Tell that to FOX. It is not the duty of TV news outlets to be unbiased. Ideally it would be, but the FOX model is working so well that other news channels have been pushed even more to entertain and be more partisan and extreme to get and keep viewers. FOX isn't all bad, but their exploits are well documented. The other shows are shit as well so nobody has to rebuttal with MSNBC et al are biased too, etc.
I wish everyone could stop with the woe is me, the other guys are biased waaa waaa. Nearly all the news shows have some bias. This is the climate all of the extreme uncompromising brainwashed party before country dimwits on both sides have created.
Denny, though I am replying directly to your quote I am not directing the name-calling to you. It is for those people that it applies to. I'm just venting my frustration at our country's problems.
I read this, and I was not persuaded. I don't think he's anywhere near as good at it as he thinks he is.
barfo
Yes, in a close election, a third party candidate can be a spoiler. This probably won't be a close election, but if it is, then the vote for your Johnson, tiny though it may be, is more likely to spoil things for Trump than Stein is for Clinton. And don't bother telling me again how Clinton voters like your Johnson.
barfo
Bullshit...Clinton and Sanders have addressed this issue many times. Sorry, I don't buy it Denny....Trump is a photo negative of what a president should be. He doesn't discriminate though...he'll hate on anyone that contests him on any level. The sooner he goes away, the better off we'll be. I'm not a Hillary fan but I really don't have an ounce of trust for Trump's character. You can't call Hillary a liar without seeing the lies for votes Trump has puked all over the media.Trump is the only candidate calling out Islam for its followers’ views on women and the LGBT community
So you're saying the polls are skewed (in Trump's favor). Got it.
