jlprk
The ESPN mod is insane.
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2009
- Messages
- 30,672
- Likes
- 8,852
- Points
- 113
I see no reason why life can only exist here on earth. Doubt is measured by the odds. And it's a matter of which odds: life elsewhere or life on quintillions of worlds or whether we can confirm this life with 100% (not 99.999999999999%) surety. I've been consistently stating my position in different words hoping the concepts sink in. A 5th grader would get it, but you don't. Or don't want to - check and mate.
jlprk called you probability challenged. He's right.
I never said highly probable. There you go again. The odds of winning the california lottery is about 1:259,000,000. That's less than 1. Someone wins, eventually. Not every week, but eventually. Less than 1 doesn't mean impossible as you've translated my words to mean.
The odds that jlprk suggests that there is life is akin to a coin flip (50-50, or 1:2). I've written (in different combinations of words with the hope that you'll comprehend their meaning) that the odds of life nobody knows, that I think it's similar to the tiny 1:259,000,000 number and that jlprk and many scientists seem to think it's 50-50. I say it looks like way < 1 odds because we can't find it. jlprk says the universe is so big that there's lots of life but it doesn't have to be close enough for us to detect. I say if we can detect it, it's a good indication it's everywhere. If we can't detect it, it suggests that what life is out there is infrequent and likely to be so far away from us that we may as well be alone in the universe (as the astrophysicist you quoted, then mischaracterized, actually said).
People express doubt as a measure of odds because doubt means:
View attachment 4602
The "truth" in this discussion being the chances of winning the life lottery.
I better learn what the argument is about if I'm being quoted. Now, I said what again? I thought I was disagreeing with Denny, not Magnifier. But since I can't possibly follow this thread (well, 99% probability), who knows who I was agreeing with.
