"I don't want any of my clients playing for Paul Allen"

[SlyPokerDog]

I don't want any of my clients playing for jlprk.

 

[jlprk]

I don't think that any of us are claiming to be antitrust or labor law experts. It seems to me that PapaG has raised some pretty good points (and/or things to chew on) even without a JD. Having food for thought--rather than just answers we are confident are correct--seems to be the best use of this board related to this issue, IMO.

Papa argues with you over the definition of collusion, then you back him up when a 3rd party, me, backs you up.

This is collusion according to Papa. And now Sly is colluding with both of you colluders. But it's not legal collusion, which was defined by the courts long ago.

 

[PapaG]

Papa argues with you over the definition of collusion, then you back him up when a 3rd party, me, backs you up.

This is collusion according to Papa. And now Sly is colluding with both of you colluders. But it's not legal collusion, which was defined by the courts long ago.

Time for Wheel of Fortune yet, Gramps?

 

[SlyPokerDog]

Papa argues with you over the definition of collusion, then you back him up when a 3rd party, me, backs you up.

This is collusion according to Papa. And now Sly is colluding with both of you colluders. But it's not legal collusion, which was defined by the courts long ago.

My colluding can be bought!