PHXBlazer1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2009
- Messages
- 7,099
- Likes
- 4,581
- Points
- 113
Fucking lawyers
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't know what we can get... most of these ideas seem either way too optimistic (Paul George? KAT?) or way too pessimistic (Kevin Love?).
It seems to me that the Blazers should trade CJ only if we can get a guy who can be the Blazers' second-best player. Better than Nurkic, and someone to help Dame win over the next few years.
If we can't--if it's just a salary dump, or we get a batch of inferior players--I think we should trade Dame. Get younger and build for the future while we play out more of CJ's contract. The team wouldn't be markedly worse (we should be able to be a borderline playoff/play-in team even without Dame) and it would be fun to feel optimistic about the future, even if Dame was killing it for another franchise.
So Moses Brown for Kemba Walker (and they threw in Al Horford)
Obviously Boston is now going to trade Jaylen Brown for CJ. They may even throw in a 1st round pick.![]()
Perhaps Boston just made room to trade for Dame?
There was an offer on the table from Boston including kemba. Gonna be hard to get a deal done for dame without that moneyPerhaps Boston just made room to trade for Dame?
Bill Simmons podcast, they had a legit convo about CJ + Roco for Simmons + filler.
And they said Philly should take that and run.
I must be dreaming. If anything like that is on the table, I would jump for joy.[/
I think it depends on the filler with that trade. Having Simmons and Roco defensively would be ideal
This is why you shouldn't listen to Bill Simmons. Bill Simmons' sole purpose in life was to write amusing draft musings once a year that you could look back on and see that they revealed he knew absolutely fuck all about predicting NBA talent. Sadly somehow he became a media mogul and we have to be bombarded by his opinions. (But at least he showed once he could be funny, whereas Steven A. Smith never even had that.)Bill Simmons podcast, they had a legit convo about CJ + Roco for Simmons + filler.
And they said Philly should take that and run.
I must be dreaming. If anything like that is on the table, I would jump for joy.
Bill Simmons podcast, they had a legit convo about CJ + Roco for Simmons + filler.
And they said Philly should take that and run.
I must be dreaming. If anything like that is on the table, I would jump for joy.
That is such a stupid comment. Does the phrase "it's psychological" mean nothing to you? You think he actually did something to make himself worse? He literally UN-practiced?Only if Simmons learns to shoot a fucking FT. He is a huge liability with that shitty FT stuff. Boggles the mind that he won't just do the work and practice. How can he be THAT bad, and he is THAT bad from the line. FTs are fundamentals.
he's got the yips. needs a change of scenery and a kick in the ass. every one of his coaches have enabled his lack of shooting.Only if Simmons learns to shoot a fucking FT. He is a huge liability with that shitty FT stuff. Boggles the mind that he won't just do the work and practice. How can he be THAT bad, and he is THAT bad from the line. FTs are fundamentals.
this has nothing to do with bill simmons.This is why you shouldn't listen to Bill Simmons. Bill Simmons' sole purpose in life was to write amusing draft musings once a year that you could look back on and see that they revealed he knew absolutely fuck all about predicting NBA talent. Sadly somehow he became a media mogul and we have to be bombarded by his opinions. (But at least he showed once he could be funny, whereas Steven A. Smith never even had that.)
If the filler were Shake Milton & Paul Reed... that would be an unbelievable deal.Bill Simmons podcast, they had a legit convo about CJ + Roco for Simmons + filler.
And they said Philly should take that and run.
I must be dreaming. If anything like that is on the table, I would jump for joy.
Bill Simmons podcast, they had a legit convo about CJ + Roco for Simmons + filler.
And they said Philly should take that and run.
I must be dreaming. If anything like that is on the table, I would jump for joy.
i think nurk is gone in a year or so, tbh.Is the resulting team really better?
Dame/Simons
Powell/Simons
Little?/DJJ?
Simmons/Collins?
Nurk/Collins?
I like Simmons a lot, but these playoffs really put into question whether he's a guy you can play in the 4th quarter of playoff games. I think as of now, the answer to that is no. He hasn't improved in 4 years, and on this team, he's definitely not playable with Nurk. Either him or Nurk has to be the roll man. So 2 of your 4 best players cannot even play together in close games. That's a recipe for disaster.
Also, that's basically CJ + 2 firsts for Simmons. I think I'd rather just try to do that instead of adding RoCo into the deal. Our team needs to actually be better after.
check this crazy response out:look at how much they're killing him
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=2093015
i really hope morey is similarly reactionary
Re: What would Ben have to do in Game 6 to be forgiven?
Post#11 » by DCasey91 » Today 10:42 am
Ben is going to be out of the league in five years bookmark that. It’s disappointing but all the signs were there
Especially if you keep RoCo. I think Little will see a bigger role in the rotation though. But got to keep Cov.i think nurk is gone in a year or so, tbh.
But the potential with Ben is too tantalizing for me-- this idea of pairing him with Dame is not about what Ben is like now. I still think he can be unlocked similar to how Westbrook was by D'Antoni right before the pandemic hit.
That said, we keep on talking about offense incessantly. The main impact is what he could allow us to do defensively.
perfect buy low opportunity. Just a few months ago, philly balked at trading Ben + pieces for Harden.check this crazy response out:
i think nurk is gone in a year or so, tbh.
But the potential with Ben is too tantalizing for me-- this idea of pairing him with Dame is not about what Ben is like now. I still think he can be unlocked similar to how Westbrook was by D'Antoni right before the pandemic hit.
That said, we keep on talking about offense incessantly. The main impact is what he could allow us to do defensively.
perfect buy low opportunity. Just a few months ago, philly balked at trading Ben + pieces for Harden.
That is such a stupid comment. Does the phrase "it's psychological" mean nothing to you? You think he actually did something to make himself worse? He literally UN-practiced?