Well the Lakers are paying Russ 44 million now so it's safe to say they'd jump at signing Dame in a heartbeat given a chance. Knicks will overpay for a franchise player...same with the Nets. Mark Cuban would break the bank to put Dame next to Luka.....Dame isn't Lebron and Melo's age and won't be when this contract is up even.
Don't agree. To start with, the Lakers can't sign Dame; he's already signed. And why would Portland trade Dame for Westbrook? Even if Portland wanted to I don't believe they could because I think Dame can't be traded till next July anyway, and Westbrook won't have a contract then
which brings up the point that all of these trade scenarios might need to be booted to next season if Dame can't be traded till then.
Counterpoints;
If Dame is playing at an elite level those extra years are worth much more than the possibility of him opting out of a contract and leaving.
Salary cap could go way up to where others players are making ~$80+ million... then Dame's $58million doesn't look so high.
I started to write about 2025 in the post I made but decided to not clutter it up. I believe 2025 is the year the NBA will be signing new media rights deals, including international streaming rights contracts. I know Amazon wants to get into NBA content real bad. And of course, Dame's extension begins at the same time the new media rights deals kick in
and you're right, if the salary cap jumps from 135-140M to 185-190M, a 58M salary wouldn't be 35% of the cap anymore. But it would be 31%. An 80M salary would require a cap of 228M, so that seems wildly unrealistic
besides that we don't know if those 58M and 63M salaries are locked amounts or if they are simply estimates of what 35% of the cap will be. That happens all the time with projected salaries. Whatever the cap, Dame will probably be making 35% of it
Contending teams don't usually care about payroll multiple years down the line; if a team thinks Dame can get them a title they'd make the move now and worry about 2027 when it comes.
which goes directly to what I've been arguing for a long time: that is if Dame is traded it would be to a contender, and the return is going to be pretty shitty because contenders almost never have high draft picks and fine young players to trade.
besides all that, both of you guys ignored my basic point: Portland won't trade Dame unless he asks to be traded, and I don't believe he'll do that. I am assuming him signing that extension is a sign of that because it essentially destroyed any leverage he might exert in a trade demand.