The problem I continue to see when comparing rosters from this year and last is the fact there was absolutely no way Portland would have been able to bring back the entire 18-19 roster.
- We were over the luxury tax and only had the taxpayers MLE
- Our top two free agents, Hood and Kanter, were acquired without Bird rights
- We were lucky to have signed one of Rodney and Enes
- Curry received an offer we couldn't match
- Aminu was unplayable the final six games of the postseason and, like Curry, was offered a contract that we rightfully didn't match
- Baze has had an inconsistent start to the season, but he's still leaps and bounds better than Turner
To me, the moves that are up for debate currently are:
- Meyers and Moe for Whiteside
- Signing Gasol, Tolliver, and Mario to minimum contracts ... but that's just it, we only had minimum contracts to offer.
The bottom line is we all said we would miss Nurk this season but I don't think we all (myself included) truly realized just how much of an impact not having him on the floor would be. Also, we are without are other top defender in Zach Collins. I don't know of too many teams who could lose not only their size, interior presence, but also their top two defenders and still succeed.
To answer the OP's question: There's just not enough evidence, yet. Portland won't have Nurk and Z back for another 4+ months, so we just don't know the answer. Given how last year's team was constructed financially it's an impossible question to ask because there was no chance of bringing that bunch back.