Isaac Ropp speaks THE TRUTH

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Isaac Ropp @iropp
For years, the Blazers have been trying to sell you it’s actually possible that togetherness can trump talent. It cannot. Ever. It’s about players and it’s good Lillard is admitting this publicly.
However, it seems we’re now being sold this roster is the best we can do in Portland because we’re little ol’ Portland. Simply not true. This is also preying upon classic PDX inferiority loathing.
This franchise has built three different iterations of championship caliber teams here. While there is no doubt it’s harder in PDX, this feels like an excuse for a GM who has failed.
Olshey hasn’t put enough talent around his star. Good players want to play with other good players and the Blazers have one of the best PG’s in the league. So how is this roster the best they can do? He’s had draft picks. He’s had chances.
Olshey is a glorified scout whose best attribute is finding cheap diamonds in the rough, none of whom have meant much to playoff success in the Lillard era. The Nurkic trade was good but it’s a one-off. This is not to mention the many FA targets he thankfully DIDN’T sign.
This Blazers team is no different than any other Lillard-led team since Aldridge left. Same thing, different year. A dangerous 8-seed disguised as a 3 or 4-seed because of all that chemistry that allows them to gobble up wins vs. bad or dysfunctional teams in the regular season.
Here are the #’s vs. teams over .500 last 4 seasons since Aldridge left (including playoffs)...

2018-19: 14-14 (??)
2017-18: 24-30 (Rd1 sweep)
2016-17: 17-30 (Rd1 sweep)
2015-16: 23-34 (Rd 2 lost 4-1)

Against “talent” they are a combined 78-108.
Short of good fortune and your first round opponent losing their top two players to injury mid-series (Paul/Griffin going down sort of proves the point), togetherness doesn’t trump talent. Ever. And this year is no different. The same fate awaits. So what to do?
Whoever is now calling the shots needs to honor a passionate owner who wanted to win more than anything by hiring a big swinger GM with balls who isn’t just biding his time for a better gig. A GM who will take risks to capitalize on a star in his prime.
It’s not easy to acquire enough impact talent to be in the conference finals convo. Yet we sit back and watch as franchises in varying market sizes continue to at least try by taking big swings: Boston, Houston, Minny, Lakers, Indy, Philly, Toronto, OKC, Denver, etc.
No guarantee it works out because more talent brings more potential problems. But wouldn’t you rather be OKC trying to make it work with all that talent vs. this cute little chemistry game that ends the same way every year?
This isn’t the best Portland can do and I feel like fans may be starting to buy this BS that it is. Hold your franchise accountable. You are the ones paying to watch. This isn’t good enough and everyone knows it including Damian Lillard.
Don’t you trust your franchise player and leader to make it work with better players? Isn’t he why they have such good chemistry now with lesser talent? He deserves a shot and despite what he says now, don’t think he won’t leave to eventually get it.
This is a talent-driven league. Blazer fans must be so bored of this “growing together” line. It’s getting them nowhere. What’s worse? It seems they may be trying to sell you this is the best they can do. It is not. You deserve better and should demand it.

I think there are more parameters to consider besides the .500 team stat. You can include injuries, road games, road game scheduling towards the end of season and the fact remains other teams are much worse off than we were (such as Knicks Nets....Etc.). I do not align with this guy. We finally have some chemistry and this Ropp doom speaker is not going to spoil my positive outlook.
 
I am shocked, just apsolutely shocked that a person who doesn’t watch much basketball anymore and has been pissed at the Blazers since he got fired (I never bought the story he tried to claim of the reasoning being he was to critical of the team because he was just horrible. A revolving door of random S2 posters would have been not only much more insightful then he was they would have also been more entertaining to watch) would read an article and immediately jump to every conclusion that lets him throw Shade at the Blazers.
 
I'm not saying discard his opinion entirely just that you should know he is always negative towards the Blazers, I literally don't remember a time he said something "good" about them. So his motives are important here too. Every time the Blazers have any sort of good "streak" he jumps up to tell everyone how "bad" things are. It's about pushing his agenda more than anything in my opinion. That's why I take everything he says that's Blazer related with a grain of salt.

I've heard him be quite positive when they are playing well. I've also heard him be realistic when they are not. Compared to most of the homers who are employed or associated by the club, I find it refreshingly objective.

I am shocked, just apsolutely shocked that a person who doesn’t watch much basketball anymore and has been pissed at the Blazers since he got fired (I never bought the story he tried to claim of the reasoning being he was to critical of the team because he was just horrible. A revolving door of random S2 posters would have been not only much more insightful then he was they would have also been more entertaining to watch) would read an article and immediately jump to every conclusion that lets him throw Shade at the Blazers.

There is more to the story....and Ropp isn't the only one to have it happen to him.
 
I've heard him be quite positive when they are playing well. I've also heard him be realistic when they are not. Compared to most of the homers who are employed or associated by the club, I find it refreshingly objective.



There is more to the story....and Ropp isn't the only one to have it happen to him.

And honestly, its not like his takes/approach to the Blazers changed much from before he got the gig, while he was working for CSNW, and after he got canned.
 
I've heard him be quite positive when they are playing well. I've also heard him be realistic when they are not. Compared to most of the homers who are employed or associated by the club, I find it refreshingly objective.



There is more to the story....and Ropp isn't the only one to have it happen to him.
I honestly dont recall a time he’s ever been positive about the team. Everytime I listen he’s pretty dismissive of even the least bit of success they have. Then what it comes to basketball in general the guy knows basically nothing, he’s pretty open about how he likes other sports a lot more.
I listen to prime time here and there and Im not argueing if he has a good reason to be upset with NO, but I would definitely argue he didnt belong on a show to talk basketball he was never a good fit in that regard.
 
Are you Isaac Ropp? Itd explain a lot. FOH.
 
You guys seriously don't see how stupid this statement is?

" But wouldn’t you rather be OKC trying to make it work with all that talent vs. this cute little chemistry game that ends the same way every year"

A team that didn't swing for the fences to resign James Harden? How is their philosophy working any better?
As if we didnt pursue Paul George.

This dude has less sources than ME. He wrote an article complaining about the GM and failed to mention how the ownership situation might affect moves. Its pathetic writing.
 
I honestly dont recall a time he’s ever been positive about the team. Everytime I listen he’s pretty dismissive of even the least bit of success they have. Then what it comes to basketball in general the guy knows basically nothing, he’s pretty open about how he likes other sports a lot more.
I listen to prime time here and there and Im not argueing if he has a good reason to be upset with NO, but I would definitely argue he didnt belong on a show to talk basketball he was never a good fit in that regard.
I honestly think I would've been a better fit. Call me cocky or whatever, I don't care.
 
I honestly think I would've been a better fit. Call me cocky or whatever, I don't care.
I like Ropps radio personality ok, but when it comes to the Blazers and the NBA as a whole he’s pretty much useless. He doesnt do his research, he doesnt seem to even like the sport.
 
I like Ropps radio personality ok, but when it comes to the Blazers and the NBA as a whole he’s pretty much useless. He doesnt do his research, he doesnt seem to even like the sport.
Exactly. In terms of knowing the game, I could bring it as much as anyone. My TV personality? I have no clue.:blink:
 
If you jokers were really so goddamn knowledgable about the game, you would be the ones who are on TV and radio sharing your sports takes. But you're not. Ropp is.
 
If you jokers were really so goddamn knowledgable about the game, you would be the ones who are on TV and radio sharing your sports takes. But you're not. Ropp is.
LOL. Ropp isnt on the radio because of his knowledge for basketball. A lot of it is about how and the way in which you speak and your personality.

Im sure you knew that though.
 
If you jokers were really so goddamn knowledgable about the game, you would be the ones who are on TV and radio sharing your sports takes. But you're not. Ropp is.
Id venture to guess my Job pays quite a bit more than Ropps. I have zero interest in doing radio. Im not claiming to be super knowledgeable about anything. Ropp does know other sports very well, just not basketball.
If your arguement is that, well its not a good one...
 
For the love of fuck. The "lucky" is the unknown. No one operates on "lucky." The known is that OKC traded for PG and then resigned him....as if they knew something no one else did. Must be luck! Or they did their job.

And why are we talking about their record? That's not the point. At all.

Relax dude. It's not a big deal as we have a difference of opinion. Not the first time and likely won't be the last time.
 
If you jokers were really so goddamn knowledgable about the game, you would be the ones who are on TV and radio sharing your sports takes. But you're not. Ropp is.

He's on the radio because he knows how to say something that will get 105 replies on an internet forum not even related to his radio show.
Ratings matter and people talking about his radio show matter. His opinion means literally jack shit as long as he can draw ratings.
 
But OKC are no closer to currently winning a title than we are so whats he getting at? OKC lost in the first round to a team lead by a rookie, we got swept by a big man that will likely go down as a top 5 PF of all time. If the Warriors collapsed then yes I’d be yelling from the rooftops about taking chances for the title now, trade anyone not named Dame or Nurk for someone great immediately. But as it is, nobody has a chance at beating them so I don’t understand the sense of urgency or why people are so desperate to convince themselves otherwise. I don’t feel like I’m ‘settling’ because I don’t think its possible to beat probably the best NBA team of all time.
 
If Howard Cossel could make it on air so can Ropp. They both talk through their nose which is a cardinal sin for any broadcaster or Radio Man.
 
For the love of fuck. The "lucky" is the unknown. No one operates on "lucky." The known is that OKC traded for PG and then resigned him....as if they knew something no one else did. Must be luck! Or they did their job.

And why are we talking about their record? That's not the point. At all.

There was a story out the other day quoting the Bucks’ GM saying that when the Warriors had Curry and Ellis as their starting backcourt, they tried to trade Curry for Bogut. The Bucks were concerned about Curry’s ankle and insisted on Ellis. The same knowledge base ended up yielding bad luck for the Bucks and excellent luck for the Warriors.

I know, rules, rules!
 
I'm so glad they allow people in jail to have access to the internet.
 
Total? Per Hour? With endorsements?
No idea what he's actually paid, but here:
https://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=Radio_Show_Host/Salary
https://www.glassdoor.com/Salaries/software-engineer-salary-SRCH_KO0,17.htm
I'm a little under the average pay on there which makes sense for many reasons without getting into specifics.

Either way, even if he made way more than me, I wouldn't really want his job, nor would I say I'm qualified for it. He is knowledgable on other sports, just not on basketball in my opinion.
No one seems to counter that he does obviously have an ax to grind with the Blazers. That he admits he doesn't even watch their games most of the time.
The argument that I couldn't do his job or I'd have his job is not a good one, because I have no desire to do his job or to go figure out how to. I also never claimed I could do it.
 
No idea what he's actually paid, but here:
https://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=Radio_Show_Host/Salary
https://www.glassdoor.com/Salaries/software-engineer-salary-SRCH_KO0,17.htm
I'm a little under the average pay on there which makes sense for many reasons without getting into specifics.

Either way, even if he made way more than me, I wouldn't really want his job, nor would I say I'm qualified for it. He is knowledgable on other sports, just not on basketball in my opinion.
No one seems to counter that he does obviously have an ax to grind with the Blazers. That he admits he doesn't even watch their games most of the time.
The argument that I couldn't do his job or I'd have his job is not a good one, because I have no desire to do his job or to go figure out how to. I also never claimed I could do it.
I think it was mostly directed at me, and it's a bad argument because it bases itself off of a premium on basketball knowledge which isnt actually there.
 
There was a story out the other day quoting the Bucks’ GM saying that when the Warriors had Curry and Ellis as their starting backcourt, they tried to trade Curry for Bogut. The Bucks were concerned about Curry’s ankle and insisted on Ellis. The same knowledge base ended up yielding bad luck for the Bucks and excellent luck for the Warriors.

I know, rules, rules!

Bucks seem fine to me...
 
But OKC are no closer to currently winning a title than we are so whats he getting at? OKC lost in the first round to a team lead by a rookie, we got swept by a big man that will likely go down as a top 5 PF of all time. If the Warriors collapsed then yes I’d be yelling from the rooftops about taking chances for the title now, trade anyone not named Dame or Nurk for someone great immediately. But as it is, nobody has a chance at beating them so I don’t understand the sense of urgency or why people are so desperate to convince themselves otherwise. I don’t feel like I’m ‘settling’ because I don’t think its possible to beat probably the best NBA team of all time.
Thats a big reason I don't want to make unnecessary sacrifices to try and get better this year when it would hurt us next year. Wait and see what happens with GS next year and if they lose some key pieces (Durant) then thats the time to strike in the west, this year we would just be attempting to be at best be the losers of the Conference finals or whenever we face the Warriors.
 
Thats a big reason I don't want to make unnecessary sacrifices to try and get better this year when it would hurt us next year. Wait and see what happens with GS next year and if they lose some key pieces (Durant) then thats the time to strike in the west, this year we would just be attempting to be at best be the losers of the Conference finals or whenever we face the Warriors.
Thats decent logic! And, there are a nu,her of teams looking to see what happens during the off-season with regards to GS.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top