Nikolokolus
There's always next year
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2008
- Messages
- 30,704
- Likes
- 6,198
- Points
- 113
Re: It's not their move, it's my move. Everyone says it's their move. I think it's (m
We don't know what he's going to be offered, so until and unless he actually does leave for less money than the Blazers offer him, why don't we just ease up off the gas on panic-mobile. Hypothetically speaking, if he leaves for less money then I would assume that he really, really needed a change of scenery, but I won't speculate about his motives because we don't even know if that's an option from his perspective.
Apparently you're too emotional to talk about this topic rationally right now. In any case I never said you were miserable, I just think the idea of owners holding all the cards is an incredibly antiquated and draconian point of view -- apparently the NBA players association agrees with me, which is why they operate in a free agency system.
Secondly, your assertion that Joel took less is flat out wrong. The Blazers were the top bidder for his services when he was a free agent a few years back; he didn't stay here out of the goodness of his heart (though maybe that was a factor?) he stayed because it was the best financial arrangement and playing arrangement for he and his family. And lastly, it's got fuck all to do with a "moral compass." There's nothing inherently moral or ethical about choosing where you would like to be employed when the rules of your collective bargaining agreement give the right to make that choice.
But never answered my question about what if he signs for less somewhere else? I mean Portland does hold the keys to give Greg the best possible deal; therefor, if another team offers him "X" contract; we match or beat and Oden just leaves; then it turns right back around on this "Millions of dollars are at stake for Oden" you keep mentioning.
We don't know what he's going to be offered, so until and unless he actually does leave for less money than the Blazers offer him, why don't we just ease up off the gas on panic-mobile. Hypothetically speaking, if he leaves for less money then I would assume that he really, really needed a change of scenery, but I won't speculate about his motives because we don't even know if that's an option from his perspective.
Well I'm really glad you think I'm miserable. In fact, I think you are extremely far off on that concept. And if you think all businesses work in this manner, then I suspect you aren't truly a business man. Players will stay in a city when they feel the love. Just like Pryzbilla taking less to stay in Portland. You act like everyone are robots and you just make the "economically feasible" decision without thinking about the "moral compass". Now that is miserable. LOL
Apparently you're too emotional to talk about this topic rationally right now. In any case I never said you were miserable, I just think the idea of owners holding all the cards is an incredibly antiquated and draconian point of view -- apparently the NBA players association agrees with me, which is why they operate in a free agency system.
Secondly, your assertion that Joel took less is flat out wrong. The Blazers were the top bidder for his services when he was a free agent a few years back; he didn't stay here out of the goodness of his heart (though maybe that was a factor?) he stayed because it was the best financial arrangement and playing arrangement for he and his family. And lastly, it's got fuck all to do with a "moral compass." There's nothing inherently moral or ethical about choosing where you would like to be employed when the rules of your collective bargaining agreement give the right to make that choice.



