Orion Bailey
Forum Troll
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2015
- Messages
- 26,285
- Likes
- 21,508
- Points
- 113
Great question - and this is why I think MJ is better. I don't think Jordans teams were all that talented...Pippen,, Rodman and Kukoc and then it gets ugly. Jordan made players better, he got the most out of each player, the role players, the bench, they all did those roles extremely well. Some is on MJ, some on Phil Jackson. I am not sure guys on Lebron's team do their jobs 'extremely well'. Not all his fault, but it appears from my perspective that the surrounding parts to their teams look different - MJs look better than Lebrons.
Thanks, See I think many believe the same from LBJ.. Take away Wade, Bosch and Love ( and a couple years of Irving) and he had garbage too. So it could be stated that LBJ gets the most out of those around him as well, or takes garbage players far.
I would consider Harper/Paxon/Armstrong a better secondary core than LBJ has had. Would you? It isn't very clear though. Looks to be close by the eye test.
Also, yes. LBJ has never played for a coach like Jackson. IF LBJ had Jackson, would his role players perform better?

