- Joined
- Jun 25, 2015
- Messages
- 60,430
- Likes
- 61,000
- Points
- 113
They probably want either Hart or the 1st, neither of which the Blazers want to give up
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How do you know that the Blazers won’t give Hart in a deal to get Grant?They probably want either Hart or the 1st, neither of which the Blazers want to give up
If the team somehow won the play in, there would be no benefit for him not to play.Irrespective of recovery time, there's no benefit to him or to the team for him to play at any point this season.
Nassir Little makes more sense to me.They probably want either Hart or the 1st, neither of which the Blazers want to give up
Nassir Little makes more sense to me.
The Blazers don't want to give him up either
The idea that this collection of scrubs could win enough games to even reach the play-in, let alone win it, is absolutely laughable.If the team somehow won the play in, there would be no benefit for him not to play.
Irrespective of recovery time, there's no benefit to him or to the team for him to play at any point this season.
You missed the original post.The idea that this collection of scrubs could win enough games to even reach the play-in, let alone win it, is absolutely laughable.
and he's expecting a 4 yr, 112 mil extension this summer. Multiple sources have reported this, and it's so specific that you just have to believe it. We just literally dumped all our contracts to add supposed cap flexibility. Giving Grant that kinda contract would put us right back where we were before, with a less talented roster.I don’t think Grant’s a difference maker. He was good in Denver because he was like the 4th option on that team.
I could see that, assuming they do it in a fashion that doesn't impact our draft position. Maybe as a proof of health for potential free agent signees as well.I wonder if he might give it a go in a game or two just as a bit of a test run. Yeah, no point in him risking it much, but approaching it like a preseason game and testing his body's response might be prudent.
Yes--that group, plus the weak bench behind them, would still be one of the worst lineups in the league.You missed the original post.
"Simons
NAW
Hart
Grant
Nurkic
That doesn't look anything like the group that lost to Orlando last night. Hell they might even make a run at the playin."
Is it still "absolutely laughable?"
Grant plays the same position as Nassir Little. I would instead trade Nassir Little for Grant, and keep all our other assets. We'd have Simons, and draft picks and whatever else we have to trade for a very good power forward.I think we could go Bledsoe + NO 1st rounder for Grant and Detroit's 2nd rounder. Seems relatively fair to me and would make Dame happy. Plus, we'd still have the big exception to use this summer/next year.
Well, there you have it. And here this whole time I thought my friend and I were tight?That's not true. He was more efficient when he played with Denver.
He can expect all he wants; I certainly wouldn't give it to him. I'd let him play out his contract and reach free agency in 2023, knowing that if he was a valuable part of an effective reload, then we can offer him more than other suitors, and that if he falls short in his contributions it will depress his market value anyway.and he's expecting a 4 yr, 112 mil extension this summer. Multiple sources have reported this, and it's so specific that you just have to believe it. We just literally dumped all our contracts to add supposed cap flexibility. Giving Grant that kinda contract would put us right back where we were before, with a less talented roster.

If that's true, we're going to have a shitty or mediocre at best team next season. Dame Lillard does not by himself make "one of the worst lineups in the league" into a contender.Yes--that group, plus the weak bench behind them, would still be one of the worst lineups in the league.
Little can play 2/3, and Grant is 3/4. Neither would have to play "out of position", since they're both versatile wings.Grant plays the same position as Nassir Little. I would instead trade Nassir Little for Grant, and keep all our other assets. We'd have Simons, and draft picks and whatever else we have to trade for a very good power forward.
To me it makes no sense to have Grant or Nassir Little play out of position when we are re-constructing a roster.
I could see that, assuming they do it in a fashion that doesn't impact our draft position. Maybe as a proof of health for potential free agent signees as well.
plus Nas, plus whatever FA we sign, plus either an impact draftee or another veteran acquired via trading the pick(s). Must look deeper.If that's true, we're going to have a shitty or mediocre at best team next season. Dame Lillard does not by himself make "one of the worst lineups in the league" into a contender.
If that's true, we're going to have a shitty or mediocre at best team next season. Dame Lillard does not by himself make "one of the worst lineups in the league" into a contender.
Wow. Just...wow. Now THAT is a tank commander!! Let's bring in General Grant.I must have just glossed over this, but Grant has not won a game since Nov 17.
View attachment 45120
Digging deeper, his team has 4 wins and 25 losses in the 29 games he's played. Pistons are 8-17 in the games he's missed. This is after he led them to a 20-52 record last year.
Holy hell. You're not giving up a lottery pick for this kinda guy. Sorry.
or rather... let's not. I can't handle that kinda losing even in a tanking season. You tend to build bad habits that can carry over. We're not a losing franchise-- i don't want these kinda guys.Wow. Just...wow. Now THAT is a tank commander!! Let's bring in General Grant.
