Propagandist
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2017
- Messages
- 3,884
- Likes
- 7,267
- Points
- 113
Suck it FAMS!
This instantly reminded me of a recent conversation I had with the Mrs. HCP...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Suck it FAMS!
Prop, Im just not sure Id give up Collins but I'd give up Jake, Simons, and/or Trent plus Mo and/or Turner.
Im not convinced the wolves would trade him to the same division. You'd need to include CJ and some for that to happen.
I agree that Simons will be a super player and I realize that Collins has a ways to go yet, but my thinking is we would have a larger need at 4/5 than 2/3 with the addition of Butler if it was going to happen.You wouldn’t give up Collins but you would Simons? Collins sucks. Simons in a few months only showed way more promise and excitement than Collins has.
Simons is going to be a star one day you can just see it. Collins is a career backup type of player
and watch Butler start the season with them and they roll off 15 straight wins! Think his trade value still goes down?Jimmy is tanking his trade value even further.... which is actually really impressive.
I am the Jimmy Butler of S2!!!!!!
You just KNOW that fucking Daryl Morey will end up getting Butler for scraps!
I hate that fucking guy and the Rockets so much.
Eh, they don't have jack shit.
Just stop. You got that bullshit straight from Skip Bayless.
Here's a teammate here giving him props. Do you research info or just swallow it? I'll trust the news from the horse's mouth before I trust an IDIOT talking head...
Would easily include Collins in a trade for upgrade - Simons No Way!
Good thing big men don't need to be able to post up to be great players.I like Collins but the dude had problems posting up guards in summer league. If he’s the reason why we won’t trade for Jimmy, well I wouldn’t be surprised bc Olshey loves his guys but ugh
It's funny, but that thought ran thru my head as well.
Simons looks exciting, he might be our star 8 years from now while Butler will be ring chasing for the vet minimum or retired.
When healthy Minnesota was a top 2 or 3 team in the west...Is he making Minnesota better? How good was Chicago with him?
When healthy Minnesota was a top 2 or 3 team in the west...
Who else are we going to go get with our assets? IMO, we need another player at least as good as CJ.So you’re a GM and want to save your job and you want to hitch your wagon to Jimmy Butler whos a world class punk who will leave in a year. Logical.
And we weren't as good as healthy Minnesota.by that same token, Portland was a top 3 team
You do not include CJ in a move for Jimmy Butler. His value is dropping.Just think about the following scenario:
*Neil trades Dame's best friend on the team for Butler*
-Butler to Dame: "HELLO LILLARD, I'M JIMMY BUTLER! I'LL SHOW YOU HOW TO WIN, THIS IS MY TEAM NOW,YOU CAN'T WIN WITHOUT ME, CUZ I'M A WINNER! I'M JIMMY BUTLER!
*turns around*
HEY YOU, THE GUY WITH THE FUNNY ACCENT, WHY YOU SO SLOW ON FAST BREAKS? SO WHAT IF YOU'RE 7 FOOT TALL?! MOVE YOUR ASS!! I'M JIMMY BUTLER!"
Dame: "The fuck just happened this week?!"
And we weren't as good as healthy Minnesota.
It's funny, but that thought ran thru my head as well.
Simons looks exciting, he might be our star 8 years from now while Butler will be ring chasing for the vet minimum or retired.
I think it should be noted that Minnesota would have been taking back Waiters, who had a 10.58 PER last year and whose three year contract would pay out about the same as Evan Turner's two year contract. I see no reason at all why Minnesota wouldn't take back Turner in a deal with us.This confirms again that Miami was offering only Richardson and a draft pick, and not taking back Dieng.
"There’s been a couple of different incarnations of this deal. The first one, the Heat didn’t want to take back Gorgui Dieng. Then, the next incarnation of the deal was ‘OK forget it, let’s just do it straight up, just for Jimmy on your end.’ They finally relented on Josh Richardson. They were giving them Josh Richardson, then Dion Waiters was going to be the cap filler and then a protected first-round pick.
The medicals were exchanged, which generally in the NBA means this is a done deal. And then, Thibs called back and wanted more picks. And Pat Riley literally — I was told — called him a motherbleeper and hung up the phone."
https://sports.yahoo.com/report-pat...otherf-hung-jimmy-butler-talks-034719927.html
I got the reason. No one thinks Turner is any good, yeah they may say he is in an interview, but behind the scenes I dont think anyone wants him. The league thinks besides Dame and CJ no one on the Blazers is that good. So its gonna be hard to get teams to take our not good, oh and overpaid players. ML and ET are more than likely staying unless theyre filler to make salaries work.I think it should be noted that Minnesota would have been taking back Waiters, who had a 10.58 PER last year and whose three year contract would pay out about the same as Evan Turner's two year contract. I see no reason at all why Minnesota wouldn't take back Turner in a deal with us.
But...someone thinks Dion Waiters is good?I got the reason. No one thinks Turner is any good, yeah they may say he is in an interview, but behind the scenes I dont think anyone wants him. The league thinks besides Dame and CJ no one on the Blazers is that good. So its gonna be hard to get teams to take our not good, oh and overpaid players. ML and ET are more than likely staying unless theyre filler to make salaries work.
I think there is a much bigger chance an NBA coach or gm would look at waiters and think oh this could be our instant offense off the bench guy and want him, than there is they look at Turner and think he could do anything they really covet.But...someone thinks Dion Waiters is good?
ML and ET are more than likely staying unless they're filler to make salaries work.
Well it was one thing to give guys big money, it was weird to give them all big money and 4 years too. Nothing like locking in the mediocrity.Kind of a catch 22. A few years back we couldn't make a big trade without combing half the team to match salaries. You have to have one or two of those types of contracts on your roster to make a big deal.......to go along with young players or draft picks. Ideally though we would have one ending contract this year and one next year.
