KingSpeed
Veteran
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2008
- Messages
- 63,334
- Likes
- 22,512
- Points
- 113
Start them bothNo and not gonna happen...Olshey is better than that. I'd rather start Plumlee.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Start them bothNo and not gonna happen...Olshey is better than that. I'd rather start Plumlee.
Let's ignore what he can do and focus on what he can't.
Well, it is his name. Kan't er.
My diving coach used to tell me, "No such word as can't." Then he expected a kid beginner to do a double backflip off the high board.
The Thunder were 15-11 (.577) with Kanter and 30-26 (.536) without him. Inconclusive. I expected a sharper difference, either pro or con.
He has slow feet. I'm not a fan. But maybe he's a cheaper Hibbert?
Kanter put up 18 ppg & 11 ppg with a 24.9 PER on 23.9 USG in 31 mpg after going to OKC. Per 82games, he only allowed a 15.4 PER to players he defended. He spent a lot of time on the floor at the same time as Adams, so I'd argue that he can play the 4 as well as the 5. IF LA does leave, we could definitely do worse than him as an LA replacement.
Let's ignore what he can do and focus on what he can't.
...when that team has a future DPOY languishing in the bench behind him...One of the things he can do is make a team better by leaving it.
...when that team has a future DPOY languishing in the bench behind him...
Oklahoma City is allowing 109 points per 100 possessions with Kanter on the floor, even worse than the league’s worst defense.
From what I can tell, Kanter was a big part of OKC being in the playoff hunt late in the season. They were winning without Durant. While he contributed to a poorer defense, I would venture a guess that his offense more than made up for it.
No, no...25 PER and .220 WS/48 is terrible and doesn't contribute to winning AT ALL!From what I can tell, Kanter was a big part of OKC being in the playoff hunt late in the season. They were winning without Durant. While he contributed to a poorer defense, I would venture a guess that his offense more than made up for it.
I'll take your word for it as I'm not really a stats guy. I just was seeing his stats post-trade and not really looking at OKC's record which was bad.No, no...25 PER and .220 WS/48 is terrible and doesn't contribute to winning AT ALL!
Your sarcasm meter needs to be recalibrated.I'll take your word for it as I'm not really a stats guy. I just was seeing his stats post-trade and not really looking at OKC's record which was bad.
It is Kanter or Harris or no one imo. (Jordan is not leaving LAC)
I bet it is no one though...
Harris is gone, Kanter not yetIf those r our only choices, I'd choose Harris no contest.
No, no...25 PER and .220 WS/48 is terrible and doesn't contribute to winning AT ALL!
My diving coach used to tell me, "No such word as can't." Then he expected a kid beginner to do a double backflip off the high board.
The Thunder were 15-11 (.577) with Kanter and 30-26 (.536) without him. Inconclusive. I expected a sharper difference, either pro or con.
He has slow feet. I'm not a fan. But maybe he's a cheaper Hibbert?
I just do not hope we overpay for an overrated low post player with no defensive ability. Guys like Greg Monroe, Enes Kanter and AL Jefferson just don't make sense for our team.
Scrap Boys!!How do you know he has "no defense"? Portland really needs a talented low post scorer. So far, all the guys we've acquired this offseason are "scrappers".
While OKC scored 109.6 points per 100 possessions with Kanter on the court, the most of any Thunder player, that offensive production was nullified by the Turkish Tower giving up 110.4 points. When Kanter sat, the team's scoring dropped to 106.2, but it also only allowed 103.3 points for a net rating of plus-2.7, per NBA.com.
In other words, the Thunder performed better with a guy averaging 18 and 11 sitting on the bench. Is that worth max money?
CBSSports' Matt Moore didn't pull any punches when talking about Kanter's brand of defense
On the other, it's hard to justify paying top dollar to a center who allowed opponents to shoot 61.2 percent from within six feet and 49.8 percent overall, per NBA.com, especially on a roster that isn't exactly stout defensively and with the depth the team already has down low.
