Apologies for not reading the first 1200 posts in this thread
That simply cannot be forgiven.
, but for the guys stating that Kavanaugh should be disqualified or that he's perjuring himself, what was it in the testimony of Ford that changed this from a vague allegation into anything resembling reasonable cause? Even the prosecutor briefed the Judiciary that she couldn't even get a search warrant based on the testimony--how can you remotely suggest a crime? The people she said could corroborate it said they don't.
I'm not challenging, I'm asking because guys like Barfo generally see the world in a different manner than I do and I'm confused by this. Were this an accusation against me in this position I can't help thinking I'd feel similarly brutalized.
Guys like barfo! They like me, they really do! [/Sally Field]
Ford didn't present proof of her allegation. She was believable, however.
One reason to think that he's lying is that he lied multiple times to the committee in his prior hearings, and he lied again about a number of things in this hearing.
She's got literally nothing to gain from lying. Yes, people can claim George Soros is paying her to do it, but realistically? Whereas he's got everything to gain by lying.
So while neither, either, or both of them could conceivably be lying, the fact that he lied repeatedly about other things, and has motivation to lie about this, makes it more likely that at least he is lying about this.
Of course, he could just not remember it. That is also a possibility - but that would mean he'd be lying about not having blackouts, which in fact multiple other people say he is.
He shouldn't have claimed to be a choir boy - that was stupid, since there are multiple people and documentary evidence to say he wasn't.
Being a stupid angry liar probably isn't the best qualification for the high court.
I don't think we have proof he committed sexual assault. I do think we have proof he's unfit for the court.
barfo