BigGameDamian
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2012
- Messages
- 33,650
- Likes
- 13,635
- Points
- 113
Neil thinks Caleb Swanigan can be like a Kevin Love type. And Nik Stauskas can be a Kyle Korver.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Link?Neil thinks Caleb Swanigan can be like a Kevin Love type. And Nik Stauskas can be a Kyle Korver.
They have $106M in active salaries--they're well above the salary floor. And even if they were below, you honestly think they'd rather pay ET & Meyers for two years rather than just pay the penalty?They need to meet a minimum salary threshold, while acquiring future assets and at the same time tanking.
ET and Meyers would fit the bill perfectly. And when their contracts become expiring they would be attractive to deal.
They have $106M in active salaries--they're well above the salary floor. And even if they were below, you honestly think they'd rather pay ET & Meyers for two years rather than just pay the penalty?
Put the Hennessy down.
but, but, but assetsThey have $106M in active salaries--they're well above the salary floor. And even if they were below, you honestly think they'd rather pay ET & Meyers for two years rather than just pay the penalty?


And then sign Tyreke to be our SG.If we could get Love without trading CJ, I would make a real push to try to trade CJ for Kawhi.

Then we'd have Dame, Simons, Trent, Moe, Nurk and a bunch of cap space. Would be an interesting 18-19 season (albeit likely disappointing), and a very interesting (albeit likely disappointing) summer of 2019. Still, better to be relevant than safe and boring.What if the Blazers go all in now and Send Collins/ET for Love and then send CJ/1st for Kawhi? Then they both bolt next season![]()
No pick in the draft and then having those guys walk would be yet another kick in the gut.Then we'd have Dame, Simons, Trent, Moe, Nurk and a bunch of cap space. Would be an interesting 18-19 season (albeit likely disappointing), and a very interesting (albeit likely disappointing) summer of 2019. Still, better to be relevant than safe and boring.
It would, no doubt. But I'm tired of sacrifice bunts. I need to see some from-the-toes swings once in a while.No pick in the draft and then having those guys walk would be yet another kick in the gut.
I'm going on record right now. There is no way Cleveland would get anything close to a CJ for Love type of deal. Most teams that would want Love are teams that don't have much to give up.Quick on Love: "I'm not sure Blazers want to go that way (as in pursuit of Love) as they want to let Collins develop. And they'd probably have to trade CJ to get Love."
Quick on Love: "I'm not sure Blazers want to go that way (as in pursuit of Love) as they want to let Collins develop. And they'd probably have to trade CJ to get Love."
That would be amazing. Then use the TPE to get a first rounder back from Denver or something.Wow Lowe and Windhorst think it would be hard for Cleveland to get a 1st round pick.
Could Leonard+Aminu+1st be enough? Lets do it
That would be amazing. Then use the TPE to get a first rounder back from Denver or something.
You wouldn't start loveThen we'd have Dame, Simons, Trent, Moe, Nurk and a bunch of cap space. Would be an interesting 18-19 season (albeit likely disappointing), and a very interesting (albeit likely disappointing) summer of 2019. Still, better to be relevant than safe and boring.
Do the Denver trade first:That would be amazing. Then use the TPE to get a first rounder back from Denver or something.
Do the Denver trade first:
Wilson Chandler and a lottery protected 2019 1st using the TPE and throw them a future 2nd in the deal.
Then what if we offered both the Denver pick AND our pick in 2019, Turner, and Leonard for Love? It would help them suck more and they'd have multiple picks to rebuild with.
Aminu and Leonard isn't enough to make the trade work.
Trade machine is broke, notice there are no numbers next to anyone's name. It happens every year when the new league year starts.Yes it is
http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=y6us2wju
And i doubt the nuggets would attach a first to chandler who is a good player