EL PRESIDENTE
Username Retired in Honor of Lanny.
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2010
- Messages
- 50,346
- Likes
- 22,532
- Points
- 113
I'm only really upset about the ZBO trade and not using the RLEC as a trade-able asset.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm only really upset about the ZBO trade and not using the RLEC as a trade-able asset.
The Knicks and Clippers are horribly run organizations. Historically, laughably bad.
Not sure I'd want to be grouped in with them.
The ZBO trade was rushed. To say it was a "must" within 5 minutes of drafting Greg Oden is laughable at best. I questioned KP's decision making at that time, and I kind of stand besides it. The blind trust put into him was sort of destructive.
Did not have to happen at that time for nothing. Could have at least tried it out rather than clear and hold cap space for 2 years which was essentially overrated and useless, if it was tangible whatsoever.
Point is, ZBO is now an allstar and we're eating crow.
Yeah, well see, I happen to not agree.ZBO trade was a must.
Blazers had just landed Greg Oden and had an emerging LaMarcus Aldridge, but also had an overpaid Zach Randolph. Now, do you start your overpaid PF in Randolph and stunt Aldridge's growth, or do you bring the grossly overpaid Randolph off the bench? Yeah, what a crappy situation that would be.
That was KP's job - to polish up that POS.....THEN sell it.The Blazers had to unload him and his contract and they got what they got. Maybe not the best haul, but the Knicks nor the Clippers got anything for him either. Quite frankly, Randolph hasn't been looked at as a valuable piece until this year when he's finally grown up a little bit.
I don't care about the Knicks. And we didn't even get cap space. See above.Frye at least had some upside to him when the Blazers got him. What did the Knicks get for Randolph? Cuttino Mobley and Tim Thomas, aka cap space.
Cap space, which we didn't even get when we shipped Zach. See above.What did the Clippers get for Randolph? Quentin Richardson(who they ended up trading) to open a spot for Blake Griffin, which is exactly what the Blazers did when they drafted Oden.
Umm, not by New York, who wouldn't have traded Frye unless they thought he wasn't going to be a good player.Randolph has been traded 3 times in the past 3 years and Pritchard arguably got the best value for him in Frye, who at the time was thought to have some potential still.
Wow, really? If KP walked onto the Mercedes lot and saw a brand new E Class with a sticker for $20,000 he would have taken it? Good. Anybody can buy or not buy what is out there. What about making deals HAPPEN?Sorry, I don't see how the ZBO trade can be looked at as bad. I've already addressed the RLEC earlier.
Richard Jefferson? no thx
Vince Carter? no thx
Gerald Wallace? Very intriguing, but the Bobcats wanted Batum.
Andre Miller? Blazers ended up just signing him.
If there was a good deal to be made Pritchard would have made it.
Yeah, well see, I happen to not agree.
I think "stunting" is a bit of a fallacy. Sports Urban Legend. LaMarcus would have been fine. Especially since, as it turned out, Greg didn't play.
That was KP's job - to polish up that POS.....THEN sell it.
How hard is that to grasp? Unless there was an imminent disaster looming - which turns out there wasn't - waiting a while would have been a wait for possible upside. The chances of having to take a crappier deal than what was a pretty lame deal was low. Eating Steve Francis' contract was a BITTER, NASTY pill to have to swallow. And Frye coming off a horrible year with the Knicks. Yippie.
Holdinging on to Zach would have been low downside risk, high upside risk. When you are rebuilding you take that.
I don't care about the Knicks. And we didn't even get cap space. See above.
Cap space, which we didn't even get when we shipped Zach. See above.
Umm, not by New York, who wouldn't have traded Frye unless they thought he wasn't going to be a good player.
Wow, really? If KP walked onto the Mercedes lot and saw a brand new E Class with a sticker for $20,000 he would have taken it? Good. Anybody can buy or not buy what is out there. What about making deals HAPPEN?
What we do know is that KP didn't get any exciting trades done. All during a period when there have been moves made by other teams. May or may not have been KP's "fault". All we can know for sure is that KP and other Blazer folk made a big deal out of the Blazer's being a team on the rise and that we dumped Zach and Darius and others so we "according to a great plan" would have the "Golden Ticket" and if that didn't work mondo cap space to bring aboard a fantastic player that would complete the core and have a contending quality roster for years to come.
At the very least KP is guilty of gross overselling of his position and the value of his assets and/or his abilities.
if he's expiring, he's a huge tradeable asset next year which we would have if we kept him. If Memphis decides to even trade their All Star!
Let's cut to the chase. The issue isn't his signings, or whether he should be fired (like the irrelevant poll thread asks). The issue is, should Vulcan should cave in to Pritchard and give him the big extension and raise he has sought since last summer?
I'm not sure what you're talking about. How did they blunder in trying to dump Miles?
ZBO trade was a must.
Ah, this thread has been up so long I'm finally going to throw something out there. It keeps bothering me that we don't have an ideal PG; who for me would be somebody who could play above average defense and was either an outstanding distributor or outstanding scorer, or average at both.
And I think Kp actually made the same mistake Nash made : drafting a PG one year early, before many good PG's would be available in the draft the next year. So because Nash drafted Telfair and KP drafted Bayless, they missed out the next year. Of course Nash actually was in position to draft two outstanding guys whereas KP didn't have a very high draft pick. But what if KP had traded Jack for a future pick, what if he had traded our pick that year for a future pick? Then he would have had some real ammo for moving up and drafting someone in the PG rich class.
Ah, this thread has been up so long I'm finally going to throw something out there. It keeps bothering me that we don't have an ideal PG; who for me would be somebody who could play above average defense and was either an outstanding distributor or outstanding scorer, or average at both.
And I think Kp actually made the same mistake Nash made : drafting a PG one year early, before many good PG's would be available in the draft the next year. So because Nash drafted Telfair and KP drafted Bayless, they missed out the next year. Of course Nash actually was in position to draft two outstanding guys whereas KP didn't have a very high draft pick. But what if KP had traded Jack for a future pick, what if he had traded our pick that year for a future pick? Then he would have had some real ammo for moving up and drafting someone in the PG rich class.
You're over thinking it; if KP had wanted any of the middle round point guards in last year's draft many of them were available for nothing more than a future first (Ty Lawson in particular).
Well, I believe that Denver had a future draft pick from another team (Charlotte?) that was more enticing than what we had. Also if KP didn't want another PG, I think he was wrong; and his decision was affected by his attachment to his pick Bayless, just as Nash's was affected by his decision to take Telfair earlier. (So, no I don't think I am overthinking; my assumptions may not all be correct, but i think they are reasonable assumptions.)
2010 - Not trading Brandon Roy at the deadline for Larry Hughes and a set of commemorative Dairy Queen Trailblazers glasses.
