Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Blazers have a 3-4 record with Meyers Leonard in the rotation.
Blazers have a 3-4 record with Meyers Leonard in the rotation.
If we had picked Meyers in the second round instead of with a lottery pick, I don't think MM would be anywhere near as hard on him.He's at a 15 PER in a limited role off of the bench, and has only a 12% Usage Rate. What more do you want out of the 9th guy in the rotation?
Other than that, you look like a genius with you constant negative "Leonar_" posts!
Define "in the rotation". The team is 3-2 in the games since Leonard was inserted back into the rotation and also 3-2 in games he's played more than 6 minutes. Blaming a loss on a guy who played less than 5 minutes seems like a bit of a stretch (so would be giving him credit for a win in such limited minutes).
BNM
Meyers was in the rotation for one game when Freeland was injured and we lost to Houston. Meyers took TRob's spot in the rotation beginning with the Minnesota game on 12/18 which is the last 6 games we've played. The total record in those 7 games is 3-4.
When Meyers is not at all part of the 9 man rotation the team is 22-3.
Meyers was in the rotation for one game when Freeland was injured and we lost to Houston. Meyers took TRob's spot in the rotation beginning with the Minnesota game on 12/18 which is the last 6 games we've played. The total record in those 7 games is 3-4.
When Meyers is not at all part of the 9 man rotation the team is 22-3.
Nice game by Leonard tonight.
I think that is more in comparison to his previous play rather than comparison to a quality backup center. He set expectations so low, he doesn't have to do a lot to have a good game. Just not sold on any part of his game...
Define "in the rotation". The team is 3-2 in the games since Leonard was inserted back into the rotation and also 3-2 in games he's played more than 6 minutes. Blaming a loss on a guy who played less than 5 minutes seems like a bit of a stretch (so would be giving him credit for a win in such limited minutes).
BNM
But do we do better with TRob in those few minutes?
In this last game Meyers had 10 boards in 20 minutes while TRob had 5 in 9 minutes. Both played well and both are totally raw and make boneheaded plays, but have serious potential. Both try hard and are supposed to be good teammates. There is no reason for everyone to choose sides, player A is awesome and player B sucks. Right now I think Meyers is ever so slightly outplaying TRob, but I can totally see how others could see the opposite.
But did you watch the game? Not trying to be a smartass. Leonar_'s rebounds came to him. T-Rob went and got his. It's a huge difference
But did you watch the game? Not trying to be a smartass. Leonar_'s rebounds came to him. T-Rob went and got his. It's a huge difference
The bottom line is both need playing time to improve. Terry can not play both as it takes a few games for each one to feel comfortable in the rotation,and since they are two entirely types of players, it takes their teammates time to adjust as well.
My biggest issue with the 2nd unit has been the bad shots and the turnovers. They have not looked cohesive. When they insert CJ into the lineup it will also take quite a few games for another young player to fit in. But he has to tinker with the line up to see what he has.
I like TRob's game more than Meyer's. I like what he brings from a physical standpoint. However I think the spacing will end up being better with Leonard in there. He has such an excellent touch for his size. But i don't want to banish Trob to the bench forever.
Maybe give each one a 10 game stretch until we know for sure?
I'm going to stick with my original argument. I think Leonard is definitely in a breakout mode right now. He made another beautiful bank shot tonight and hit a very smooth looking jump shot. And the comment that he's only getting rebounds that come to him is ridiculous. He fought very hard for at least a couple of those boards and the rest is all about being in the right place at the right time. Leonard is making big strides.
But did you watch the game? Not trying to be a smartass. Leonar_'s rebounds came to him. T-Rob went and got his. It's a huge difference
I disagree. I recall a couple of Leonard's boards that he snatched from other people (not teammates), and others that he got because he claimed and owned real estate prior to the miss. He's really improving on his box-outs. I have no problem with him getting rebounds that "come to him" because he prepared properly in order for that to occur.
http://stats.nba.com/gameDetail.html?GameID=0021300480
go to that link, and click on Meyers rebounds and watch the video and then TRob's rebounds and watch the video. I haven't done this yet, busy at work, but it should make it clear if they were working to get them.
I must rep you.http://stats.nba.com/gameDetail.html?GameID=0021300480
go to that link, and click on Meyers rebounds and watch the video and then TRob's rebounds and watch the video. I haven't done this yet, busy at work, but it should make it clear if they were working to get them.
I disagree. They only came to him because he put himself in the right position for them to 'come to him'. A minor quibble, I suppose.I'd say six of Leonard's boards "came to him", and he had to work for four of them.
Thanks.
Leonard's 2nd board--boxed out his man, then went across the key for the ball. 3rd rebound--skied in from the baseline (arguably took it away from Lopez, who was battling with his man for position). 5th rebound--got position in the key and snatched the ball just before McRoberts could sneak in for it. 10th rebound--went up and got it before two potential offensive rebounders could do so.
I'd say six of Leonard's boards "came to him", and he had to work for four of them.
I must rep you.
That was interesting. Every one of Meyers' rebounds were the result of focusing on good position defense, boxing out, and paying attention to the play. On one, he was set up on the three point line in the corner and crashed the board; one was on a missed free throw. It seemed like all or nearly all of his rebounds led to points or at least good shots. Robinson's first two rebounds were assisted by Meyers boxing out, and leaving Robinson open for the rebound, which either could have taken. Robinson's next two rebounds were on missed free throws, one of which he took away from Meyers. Robinson's fifth rebound was was crashing the boards on a Meyers missed three attempt.
http://stats.nba.com/gameDetail.html?GameID=0021300480
go to that link, and click on Meyers rebounds and watch the video and then TRob's rebounds and watch the video. I haven't done this yet, busy at work, but it should make it clear if they were working to get them.
That was certainly my original thought when he first cracked the rotation - and I wouldn't be the least bit surprised to find out it's true. What I'm wondering now is whether this "showcasing" is making us reconsider. He definitely hasn't played his way into "keeper" status, but he's shown a lot more than he ever has in the past. His offense is quite decent, and it seems that he's learning from Joel how to remain vertical when challenging shots. Where I previously didn't see any reason to keep him, I'm now seeing a glimmer of potential.I tend to agree, but I'm also wondering if we're trying to showcase him.
