Lillard Demands Changes Are Made

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Terry Stawts said:
28 points on 40% shooting is nothing to write home about for your franchise player taking up half our salary cap. Almost all of that came in the first half. He was non-existent in “Lillard time” and went something like 1-9 in the 4th. He looked totally exhausted in the first round of the playoffs, how is he ever going to carry us to a ring?

he needs to spend less time campaigning for Democrats, drinking wine, and rapping and more time conditioning. He’s not a champion, he just plays one on TV.
Click to expand...

@SlyPokerDog who's troll account is this?
 
All you can do is namecall. You realize everything I’m saying is a fact. The Cult of “Dame Dolla” is very strong here. He shoots 40%, goes totally silent and dead legged in the 4th, doesn’t keep his teammates focused when were up to end the game in the 3rd, and doesn’t play any defense all game... and you still wanna carry his jockstrap because he hit a ton of 3s in game 5 during a loss. This is why Portland will never win a ring in the foreseeable future.
 
Haakzilla said:
...clearly a Warriors fan so one of the "regulars" from that lil clan :dunno:
Click to expand...

interesting how none of you can dispute a word I wrote. This is what cults look like when confronted with evidence that their savior is a fraud.
 
Terry Stawts said:
All you can do is namecall. You realize everything I’m saying is a fact. The Cult of “Dame Dolla” is very strong here. He shoots 40%, goes totally silent and dead legged in the 4th, doesn’t keep his teammates focused when were up to end the game in the 3rd, and doesn’t play any defense all game... and you still wanna carry his jockstrap because he hit a ton of 3s in game 5 during a loss. This is why Portland will never win a ring in the foreseeable future.
Click to expand...

GiantZealousCur-size_restricted.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: RR7
Natebishop3 said:
GiantZealousCur-size_restricted.gif
Click to expand...
These are the sort of “arguments” I made in grade school. Cmon, you can do it, try naming one thing I said that was false. Was the 40% shooting false? Was dame disappearing in the 4th false? Was Dame getting scored on over and over by a 30 year old rookie from the D-league false? You got nothing but memes and insults.
 
Blazerreynolds said:
That says more about Dame, doesn't it?

Shouldn't a true superstar, or number one option be able to beat a team without two of their best four players? PHX has zero superstars, 2 stars, but no superstars and took advantage of the defending champs without one of their best players.
Click to expand...

.....didn't Dame put up a league record 55 points in one game?

Dame is not, and never has been, the problem. Terry Stott's 2005 playbook and the team's overall lack of defense, on the other hand.....
 
i can't handle twitter and ig today. too many dame trade comments. need to step away a bit for my sanity, but just waiting for this stotts firing news to drop so i can get about my weekend.
 
illmatic99 said:
i can't handle twitter and ig today. too many dame trade comments. need to step away a bit for my sanity, but just waiting for this stotts firing news to drop so i can get about my weekend.
Click to expand...

I stopped using Twitter years ago, and I only go on IG maybe once a month or two. My sanity greatly improved when I got off of Twitter.....that place is a cesspit.
 
Jade Falcon said:
.....didn't Dame put up a league record 55 points in one game?

Dame is not, and never has been, the problem. Terry Stott's 2005 playbook and the team's overall lack of defense, on the other hand.....
Click to expand...

No no no ... 2005 is just the 18th edition. The playbook is originally from 1985 and has received minor updates since.
 
Jade Falcon said:
.....didn't Dame put up a league record 55 points in one game?

Dame is not, and never has been, the problem. Terry Stott's 2005 playbook and the team's overall lack of defense, on the other hand.....
Click to expand...

That game they lost?

That is the story of Dame. He puts up his numbers, and loses. Fire Scotts all you want, but the next coach can't teach size to Dame or CJ. Dame as our #1 guy will never get us anywhere, cause he is a one way player. He will put up 40, but give up 40. Small one way guards never win titles as the number 1 guy, never have.
 
Blazerreynolds said:
That game they lost?

That is the story of Dame. He puts up his numbers, and loses. Fire Scotts all you want, but the next coach can't teach size to Dame or CJ. Dame as our #1 guy will never get us anywhere, cause he is a one way player. He will put up 40, but give up 40. Small one way guards never win titles as the number 1 guy, never have.
Click to expand...

Who scored 40 on Dame in this series?
 
Terry Stawts said:
Was Dame getting scored on over and over by a 30 year old rookie from the D-league false? You got nothing but memes and insults.
Click to expand...
Campazzo had a whopping 10 points. 5 Dame wasn't even in the game. And 3 more came on a foul by CJ shooting 3.
So 2 points is getting scored on over and over? Fuck outta here with your troll shit thinking your dropping facts.
 
Natebishop3 said:
Who scored 40 on Dame in this series?
Click to expand...

Okay...so I am really debating with a guy who takes NBA expression literally......LOL.....

Score 20, gives up 20

Puts up 40, gives up 40

Drops 50, but give up 50

Gives you 30, but gives up 30

Are all expressions meaning the player has poor defense. It is a know fact Dame has zero defense. Stephen A Smith said, he told Dame and CJ this to their faces. Everyone knows Dame has no D. Which is why River and Monte Morris, whoever the F**k that guy is.......had some big nights. They are otherwise, so so players.
 
It does not actually mean the player will score 40 points every night, while giving up 40 points every night for 82 games......

Just making sure you understand that my friend......lol......
 
Blazerreynolds said:
Okay...so I am really debating with a guy who takes NBA expression literally......LOL.....

Score 20, gives up 20

Puts up 40, gives up 40

Drops 50, but give up 50

Gives you 30, but gives up 30

Are all expressions meaning the player has poor defense. It is a know fact Dame has zero defense. Stephen A Smith said, he told Dame and CJ this to their faces. Everyone knows Dame has no D. Which is why River and Monte Morris, whoever the F**k that guy is.......had some big nights. They are otherwise, so so players.
Click to expand...

tenor.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: RR7
Trade CJ, Trade Nurk, Trade Dame… don’t care. I just want to see Dame get a ring. Dude deserves it.
 
Terry Stawts said:
28 points on 40% shooting is nothing to write home about for your franchise player taking up half our salary cap who plays 0 defense. And Almost all of that came in the first half. He was non-existent in “Lillard time” and went something like 1-9 in the 4th. He looked totally exhausted in the first round of the playoffs, how is he ever going to carry us to a ring?

he needs to spend less time campaigning for Democrats, drinking wine, and rapping and more time conditioning, learning to play D, and learning how to hold his teammates accountable, . He’s not a champion, he just plays one on TV.
Click to expand...


E3Cqa7PVIAQ1VQa
 
I don't get "wanting" a player to win a title.

I want Portland to win.

I'm happy when the players get paid (that's more important), but I don't care who wins what.
 
Jade Falcon said:
.....didn't Dame put up a league record 55 points in one game?

Dame is not, and never has been, the problem. Terry Stott's 2005 playbook and the team's overall lack of defense, on the other hand.....
Click to expand...

Don't feed them.
 
RR7 said:
Campazzo had a whopping 10 points. 5 Dame wasn't even in the game. And 3 more came on a foul by CJ shooting 3.
So 2 points is getting scored on over and over? Fuck outta here with your troll shit thinking your dropping facts.
Click to expand...

dame’s defense was atrocious all series long. He was the start of the breakdown in our defense countless times. Just because a guard blows by him, forces Nurk to help, then passes to Jokic for a wide open layup doesn’t mean Dame played good defense. Campazzo and Rivers are bad players who arguably shouldn’t even be in the NBA and they had no time breaking down Lillard.

I can’t name a single playoff series where Dame has ever showed up and even played AVERAGE defense. Ok nearly every play he just goes through the motions, watched helplessly as he gets screened and becomes totally worthless, forcing our bigs into a 2v1 situation. He makes CJ look good in comparison.

are you seriously under the impression that Dame is anything but an atrocious defender?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top