I thought the shot was good. In any case, shouldn't the refs review that play at that time? That's the new rule, correct? And yes, LaMarcus was clearly fouled.
I thought a TV replay clearly showed the shot clock at 0 with the ball in LaMarcus' hand, even MB acknowledged it was the right call and if he thinks it is, then you know it probably is..
But in that case, it still should've been reviewed since there was also a timeout called after that.
NBA instant replay rules
2006-2007: Section II-Reviewable Matters
a. If an instant replay review is triggered as described in Section I-a (1) and (2) above,
the officials would review the tape to determine only the following issues:
(1) Whether time on the game clock expired before the ball left the shooter's hand.
(2) If the shot was timely, whether the successful field goal was scored correctly as
a two-point or three-point field goal.
(3) If the shot was timely, whether the shooter committed a boundary line violation.
For purposes of this review, the official would look only at the position of the
shooter's feet at the moment they last touched the floor immediately prior to (or,
if applicable, during) the release of the shot.
(4) Whether the 24-second clock expired before the ball left the shooter's hand.
(5) Whether an 8-second backcourt violation occurred before the ball left the shooter's
hand.
http://www.nba.com/analysis/rules_history.html
