Politics Manafort goes on trial tomorrow

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Users who are viewing this thread

Geez! This trial is such a farce, I expect there are several jurors that will not vote to convict just because it smell so bad. Why are they being called on to judge a man the IRS could not handle in standard order?
 
Geez! This trial is such a farce, I expect there are several jurors that will not vote to convict just because it smell so bad. Why are they being called on to judge a man the IRS could not handle in standard order?
Nope. Time will tell and it appears you will be pissed off. :bgrin:
 
Standard operating procedure for the IRS to handle. Having a Special Counsel do this smells like a witch hunt.
Not when money laundering includes pay for play with foreign politicians or offers of cabinet positions to bankers for loans....this was always going to start as a money trail..in 5 weeks the next trial will be phase 2 and be about obstruction....that you don't value upstanding values in regards to campaign corruption with ties to the govt is actually quite baffling...yet you get wound up over street people in Portland....corrupt millionaires in Washington aren't worth investigating? C'mon...partisanship shouldn't ever mask illegal acts
 
Nope. Time will tell and it appears you will be pissed off. :bgrin:
Or he won't. Some bullshit conspiracy theory about the Jurors or the Judge will surface and trumptards will sink their teeth into it and propagate as fact so they don't have to face the truth themselves. Standard operating procedure for these nut bags.
 
Or he won't. Some bullshit conspiracy theory about the Jurors or the Judge will surface and trumptards will sink their teeth into it and propagate as fact so they don't have to face the truth themselves. Standard operating procedure for these nut bags.
I mean, he's already setting it up with this line "I expect there are several jurors that will not vote to convict just because it smell so bad."
 
Geez! This trial is such a farce, I expect there are several jurors that will not vote to convict just because it smell so bad. Why are they being called on to judge a man the IRS could not handle in standard order?

...the IRS had a lot of its teeth pulled years ago doesn't have the same juice as Mueller.
 
Not guilty melt downs coming soon.

Yeah...that would be a sight. The prosecution has charges that at worst would net him over three hundred years in prison. To get an acquittal or a not guilty verdict would not bode well for mueller.
 
Yeah...that would be a sight. The prosecution has charges that at worst would net him over three hundred years in prison. To get an acquittal or a not guilty verdict would not bode well for mueller.

...and if/when the guilty verdict is handed down you and Marz and the other humpers will either suddenly develop a chronic case of lock jaw...or you'll you'll simply scream that the trial was a farce or a "witch hunt".
 
...and if/when the guilty verdict is handed down you and Marz and the other humpers will either suddenly develop a chronic case of lock jaw...or you'll you'll simply scream that the trial was a farce or a "witch hunt".

If you had followed this post, you would have seen where I stated that I thought he was toast. I believe that if he is guilty, he should receive the appropriate punishment. Over three hundred years in prison? I do not see how that is anything but excessive and leads me to believe there is another motivation.
 
...and if/when the guilty verdict is handed down you and Marz and the other humpers will either suddenly develop a chronic case of lock jaw...or you'll you'll simply scream that the trial was a farce or a "witch hunt".

Most assuredly the latter. Then they will go on a trump is going to pardon him anyway kick.
 
If you had followed this post, you would have seen where I stated that I thought he was toast. I believe that if he is guilty, he should receive the appropriate punishment. Over three hundred years in prison? I do not see how that is anything but excessive and leads me to believe there is another motivation.

...BS, you're all over the place...you claim one thing then post something else...you'll claim victory regardless of the verdict...keep up the good work...I'm happy for you, no really.
...and fwiw, it's very common for people to be given "unsurvivorable" sentences.
 
Last edited:
If you had followed this post, you would have seen where I stated that I thought he was toast. I believe that if he is guilty, he should receive the appropriate punishment. Over three hundred years in prison? I do not see how that is anything but excessive and leads me to believe there is another motivation.
That's what the law and order folks have been prescribing for decades and now more than ever.
 
If you had followed this post, you would have seen where I stated that I thought he was toast. I believe that if he is guilty, he should receive the appropriate punishment. Over three hundred years in prison? I do not see how that is anything but excessive and leads me to believe there is another motivation.

That isn't a judgment call, that's the sentencing guidelines talking. He committed a lot of crimes. Allegedly.

barfo
 
Oh, Barfo buddy...as I stated above, I think the guy is toast.

...BS, you're all over the place...you claim one thing then post something else...you'll claim victory regardless of the verdict...keep up the good work...I'm happy for you, no really.

...and fwiw, it's very common for people to be given "unsurvivorable" sentences.


So...where is the BS? I have been consistent.
 
Most assuredly the latter. Then they will go on a trump is going to pardon him anyway kick.

...yeah, I wouldn't be surprised...but there's probably at least on more trial for Manafort...plus, there may even be states charges that Trump has no control over.
 
okay...if you are going to make a statement, be willing to back it up. Just how am I riding the fence?

...lol...so you want me to dredge through the 1000s of posts and then copy and paste them here just so you can deny them or claim that it was out of context or some other lame excuse?...sorry, ain't gonna happen.

...I read, and I remember what I read...but you can then claim whatever you want to...such is life on an anonymous message board.
 
If you had followed this post, you would have seen where I stated that I thought he was toast. I believe that if he is guilty, he should receive the appropriate punishment. Over three hundred years in prison? I do not see how that is anything but excessive and leads me to believe there is another motivation.
New flash. He won't serve 300 years. He will be dead.
 
...lol...so you want me to dredge through the 1000s of posts and then copy and paste them here just so you can deny them or claim that it was out of context or some other lame excuse?...sorry, ain't gonna happen.

...I read, and I remember what I read...but you can then claim whatever you want to...such is life on an anonymous message board.


So, basically, you are talking out your ass..cool beans. Do as you wish, I just do not appreciate being called a liar, so if you can not refrain, just do not respond to my posts and i shall do the same in kind.
 
Back
Top