- Joined
- Oct 5, 2008
- Messages
- 128,511
- Likes
- 148,968
- Points
- 115
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Conversely, taking control of a sovereign nation with powerful friends and yet no plan on how to control them is not stabilizing the world, and a stable world favors those that are the most powerful.Ideologically speaking, I am not for Imperialism. However, the world is not pink. So I rather have USA as strongest power in the world, over other countries that are seeking power these days.
Living in the US and enoying its privilges is not a bad thing at all, and promoting ties (power) with other regions of the world that can share values and interests that allign is a win-win IMO.
Venezuela under Maduro is not a country leading towards global peace and quiet for all mankind..
Edit - following futher thinking, I amend my inital take - I think Imperalism is Fact. Humanity trait. Historically speaking the minute Humans led socializing lives - Imperialism became a constant fact. So Ideologically speaking - I am not for or against it - it is just intrinsic to being human in societies. (Power=Empire)
Colombia*Columbia has amassed an army to counter the US invasion on the border of Venezuela....they say that South American revolutionaries all throughout the western hemisphere and ready to counter US military aggression....fighting multiple Latin American countries would be like fighting several Viet Nam wars at the same time. These are some of the most experienced revolutionaries in the world. Trump just opened a can of worms he won't be able to close...if he thought ICE and the border were making us safe, he just made us the target of freedom fighters all throughout the western hemisphere.
Havent they had a refugee crisis since Maduro was in power?Colombia*
They amassed troops at the border in case of a refugee crisis. Petro was democratically elected, but is pretty unpopular. My wife voted for him and regrets it. Unfortunately in Colombia whoever is in office is usually not popular because improving life there is extremely difficult for anyone in office, regardless of ideology.
Obviously he is more popular than maduro but I have a hard time believing their military will put up much of a fight for him.
Well, that's a bit of rewriting history here, General Douglas MacArthur was the Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers in Japan making him, basically, near-absolute authority over Japan's post-war reconstruction (and let's face it, the US reconstructed Japan including land reform, constitution and demilitarization.Hopefully, it works out for Venezuela like it did for Japan. Truman didn't name himself interim leader there like Trump did in Venezuela though.
Well, that's a bit of rewriting history here, General Douglas MacArthur was the Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers in Japan making him, basically, near-absolute authority over Japan's post-war reconstruction (and let's face it, the US reconstructed Japan including land reform, constitution and demilitarization.
Truman's appointee pretty much was the interim leader of Japan post WW2.
Oops, I see that this was already mentioned earlier. Sorry, I am reading this thread in order.
Actually our military transition team and war tribunal did not get involved with the civil agencies of Japan. They just insured the military was dismantled and the emperor was reduced to a puppet figure. We advised them in drafting a constitution and transitioning from military industrial complex to just an industrial based economy. Mac would never claim to be leader of Japan.. he was leader of the Allied command and Russia though invited, refused to join the reconstruction team because they didn't want to take orders from us. Japan did have it's own govt during our occupation. Many Japanese businessmen worked with our team to reform the govt and infrastructure. We don't often think of our presence in S. Korea and our military command there to be "running S. Korea" for example.My mistake
Yes you’re right there. But I mean a refugee crisis that completely overwhelmed the border.Havent they had a refugee crisis since Maduro was in power?
Be safe my friend! Sounds like it’s going to be sketchy there for a while!Yes you’re right there. But I mean a refugee crisis that completely overwhelmed the border.
I was awake when all of this happened and Colombia announced troops at the border before Trump announced that they kidnapped Maduro. Colombia wasn’t sure what was going on and it looked like a full on invasion until trumps tweet. The border would’ve have been chaos if it was a full on invasion.
I appreciate that! We are safe here in the burbs but we are supposed to be having a wedding in July in Colombia….hopefully things aren’t too crazy. My maga mom is going lolBe safe my friend! Sounds like it’s going to be sketchy there for a while!
In other words we taxpayers.Such bullshit.
Trump says the U.S. government may reimburse oil companies for rebuilding Venezuela's infrastructure
![]()
Trump says the U.S. may reimburse oil companies for rebuilding Venezuela's infrastructure
Big oil firms will either "get reimbursed by us or through revenue," Trump told NBC News in an exclusive interview.www.nbcnews.com
Hey, the money they aren't giving the at-risk for healthcare has to go somewhere.Such bullshit.
Trump says the U.S. government may reimburse oil companies for rebuilding Venezuela's infrastructure
![]()
Trump says the U.S. may reimburse oil companies for rebuilding Venezuela's infrastructure
Big oil firms will either "get reimbursed by us or through revenue," Trump told NBC News in an exclusive interview.www.nbcnews.com
Maddow left out this also takes up some of the news hole that would have gone to the Trump Administration covering up what's in the Epstein files.Reuters contacted executives at four largest US oil companies. They all say Trump did not contact them about the invasion either before or after. They found out when everyone else did. Also they are not anxious to start operations in Venezuela. Trump likes to talk about "taking the oil". Contrary to his later claims he supported Iraq war but said US should have taken the oil. Oil isn't something that can be taken like mugger taking someone's wallet. Oil has to be extracted and refined. That means, now that all easily available oil is already out of the ground, billions of dollars invested that won't see profit for years. It requires reliable power grid to supply electricity, infrastructure like roads and ports, skilled workers and political stability. None of which currently exist in Venezuela.
The rationale changes five times a day. Rachel Maddow proposed most logical. Trump wants the military at his personal whim. He wants to establish he can send troops anywhere from Venezuela to Greenland to Portland without any accountability or any need to provide a justification. And because he sees himself as ruler of Western hemisphere.
The reason is there is no reason.
Actually she didn't.Maddow left out this also takes up some of the news hole that would have gone to the Trump Administration covering up what's in the Epstein files.
Actually she didn't. She talked specifically about Epstein and deadline for Department of Justice to release all files which they have not done.Maddow left out this also takes up some of the news hole that would have gone to the Trump Administration covering up what's in the Epstein files.
