http://www.davidwblight.com/memorial.htm
I wonder how they got the word? The Emancipation Proclamation did not:
Outlaw Slavery
It didn't buy the slaves
It didn't even apply to slaves in the states that were not part of the Confederacy, Kentucky, Maryland, Delaware and Missouri.
It didn't even apply to slaves in the North.
It might have been the only thing Linclon did right. He didn't start the war to free the slaves, hell he could have bought the slaves at going market value cheaper than the war cost, but for one small issue, no sellers, nor funds if there were. He started the war for reasons that he had no authority in the Constitution.
If it were about Slaves and he had a willing population behind him to free slaves, buying them would seem to be a logical solution. Very much like the Commercial fisherman have been bought out by the federal government in this country.
The Emancipation Proclamation was nothing more that punitive action against the rebellion states, it didn't cover anywhere else. But I imagine they took it as a good thing anyway, hoping for more to follow.