KeepOnRollin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2010
- Messages
- 11,498
- Likes
- 5,679
- Points
- 113
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
With all the other dumb moves they've made, this seems like just another dumb one they didn't make.I call bullshit.
Yeah, what's the best they could've offered? Vucevic, Ibaka, Hezonja, and picks?I call bullshit.
shit i'd throw in all 3 of ours.
I'd Rather roll with Nurkic at this point, and use our assets in pursuit of a complementary power forward, a defensive minded backup PG/SG, or an athletic wing. I like Nurkic's attitude. Boogie, not so much.

Cmon man!First we do this:
http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=zbb7ajb
Then we do this and include whatever picks needed to make it happen.
http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=jq5gbse
This has us looking like this:
Dame/Napier
CJ/Turner/Connaughton
Turner/Harkless
Griffin/Davis
Nurkic/Okafor
Is that not a contender?
Cmon man!
Why would the Clippers blow it up? Thats no where near enough value for Paul AND Griffin anyway.
That's still not a contender, because defense.
And VASTLY cheaper. I'm also on the "let's stick with Nurk" wagon. My interest in DMC has plummeted.Nurkic is just a younger Boogie![]()
"and Quarterman to fill the void of Paul". What? Lol.Because they will get ousted in the first or second round again and thier time is up. Getting Butler, and quarterman to fill the void of Paul, Getting AMinu and Vonleh to fill the void of Griffin. Plus they can shed some salary with Ezeli, making Butlers contract not look so bad in the trade.
Thier time is up. If they want to get anything for them they better move soon and I think that's a decent package over.
You dont think Turner/Blake/Nurkic is good enough defensively to hide Dame and CJ?
Let's work with Nurk!And VASTLY cheaper. I'm also on the "let's stick with Nurk" wagon. My interest in DMC has plummeted.

"and Quarterman to fill the void of Paul". What? Lol.
Aminu and Vonleh to fill the role of Griffin? What are you talking about? Lol.


Smart moveThe 76ers pulled Jahlil Okafor from their lineup last week b/c a deal w/Portland for the center was close to happening, per league sources.
David Aldridge @daldridgetnt 6m6 minutes ago
More
The Blazers, however, decided instead to do a trade w/Denver for Jusuf Nurkic & a 2017 first-round pick, giving Portland three 2017 firsts.

The 76ers pulled Jahlil Okafor from their lineup last week b/c a deal w/Portland for the center was close to happening, per league sources.
David Aldridge @daldridgetnt 6m6 minutes ago
More
The Blazers, however, decided instead to do a trade w/Denver for Jusuf Nurkic & a 2017 first-round pick, giving Portland three 2017 firsts.
We still want him. As our backup. But now it will cost less.
First we do this:
http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=zbb7ajb
Then we do this and include whatever picks needed to make it happen.
http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=jq5gbse
This has us looking like this:
Dame/Napier
CJ/Turner/Connaughton
Turner/Harkless
Griffin/Davis
Nurkic/Okafor
Is that not a contender?
Its possible we could be contenders next year.That'd be hilarious if we got him for a second rounder, but I can't see it, although I do think his future is as a backup. I wouldn't mind Okafor being a go to guy on the second unit.
There was another reporter saying we were just trying to bargain with Denver.I am completely shocked we almost had Okafor. I wonder what the snag was?
Nurkic + pick + better defense + not having to pay Plumlee was a better deal and a better fit?I am completely shocked we almost had Okafor. I wonder what the snag was?
I am completely shocked we almost had Okafor. I wonder what the snag was?
There was another reporter saying we were just trying to bargain with Denver.