Merged: The 15th Roster Spot

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

e_blazer

Rip City Fan
Joined
Sep 16, 2008
Messages
24,279
Likes
30,493
Points
113
I wonder if KP plans on adding a player to fill the Blazers' open 15th roster spot. It seems to me that a solid backup SG would be good insurance against Brandon's hamstring problems. Any thoughts on what decent FAs might be available to sign for the veteran's minimum? Any guys likely to be waived after this round of deadline trades?
 
Re: The 15th Roster Spot

Maybe Flip Murray??? but i think Bulls keep him
 
Re: The 15th Roster Spot

Wheels just said they were not gonna fill it yet.
 
Re: The 15th Roster Spot

I prefer to keep the flexbility based upon possible free agents left out in the cold after next years free agent market.
 
Re: The 15th Roster Spot

I prefer to keep the flexbility based upon possible free agents left out in the cold after next years free agent market.

I don't really see that as being a factor. If they sign somebody, I'd think it would just be for the rest of this year.
 
Re: The 15th Roster Spot

A shooting guard? Really? We've got Rudy/Bayless/Roy at the SG, and Mills/Miller/Bayless at the PG.

Dante/Webs/Batum @ 3
Pendy/LMA @ 4
Camby/How @ 5

seems like we need some more big men..../shrug
 
Re: The 15th Roster Spot

I don't really see that as being a factor. If they sign somebody, I'd think it would just be for the rest of this year.

Yea you would hope so. But oftentimes in order to entice a veteran, they offer more.
 
Re: The 15th Roster Spot

A shooting guard? Really? We've got Rudy/Bayless/Roy at the SG, and Mills/Miller/Bayless at the PG.

Dante/Webs/Batum @ 3
Pendy/LMA @ 4
Camby/How @ 5

seems like we need some more big men..../shrug

If Roy's healthy, then I'd agree. If not, then I'd think a vet at that position would be needed. All of which, is why it's smart for KP not to make a move right now. Wait and see how Brandon does over the next few weeks before using that slot.
 
Re: The 15th Roster Spot

I'm concerned about the PG position. Bayless' play of late makes me wonder how many minutes you can really play him at that position in playoff implication games and playoff games.

Can't wear Miller before the playoffs and if Bayless isn't hitting that outside shot or getting ball movement on offense, that could be trouble in the PG position.

Still think it was a good trade, but I see PG as the thinnest spot now.
 
Re: The 15th Roster Spot

I'm concerned about the PG position. Bayless' play of late makes me wonder how many minutes you can really play him at that position in playoff implication games and playoff games.

Can't wear Miller before the playoffs and if Bayless isn't hitting that outside shot or getting ball movement on offense, that could be trouble in the PG position.

Still think it was a good trade, but I see PG as the thinnest spot now.

The whole point of making this trade was to determine if our young guys can ball at the level management is expecting them to. By the time this year is done, we will know if we need to make another move or not. It's not like we were going to win jack shit in the playoffs this year anyhow.
 
Re: The 15th Roster Spot

I'm concerned about the PG position. Bayless' play of late makes me wonder how many minutes you can really play him at that position in playoff implication games and playoff games.

Can't wear Miller before the playoffs and if Bayless isn't hitting that outside shot or getting ball movement on offense, that could be trouble in the PG position.

Still think it was a good trade, but I see PG as the thinnest spot now.

Again, I think it depends on Roy's health. A healthy Brandon can play the point with either Rudy or Bayless. If he's out, then we're pretty thin there now that Blake's gone.
 
Re: The 15th Roster Spot

I'm concerned about the PG position. Bayless' play of late makes me wonder how many minutes you can really play him at that position in playoff implication games and playoff games.

Can't wear Miller before the playoffs and if Bayless isn't hitting that outside shot or getting ball movement on offense, that could be trouble in the PG position.

Still think it was a good trade, but I see PG as the thinnest spot now.

Yes. That's how I think Pritchard would/will use the 15th spot...on a veteran point guard who has point guard skills better than Bayless and Mills at this point of their careers. Miller needs to be kept to 30 minutes per game, maximum.
 
Re: The 15th Roster Spot

With all of these trades going down, many of them simply as salary dumps, there could be quite a few decent players out there as free agents in a matter of days.

Big Z, Drew Gooden, maybe even a guy like RJeff (doubtful) or Roger Mason (also doubtful) to be had.

I agree that keeping it open allows for flexibility, but the Blake/Trout for Camby trade could become even bigger if we were able to land a difference maker w/ that open roster spot.

Probably won't happen, but its clear that the front office is pusing hard for the playoffs, so you never know...
 
Re: The 15th Roster Spot

Kenny Thomas just got waived.
 
Re: The 15th Roster Spot

Brian Smith just twatted this:
portland's roster now sits at 14 after the deadline....word is they are looking for a point guard for that 15th spot. stay tuned.
 
Blazers Search for 15th Man

I say we go after Mike James, Decent Shooter

And here you thought the Portland Trail Blazers were done making moves.

As it stands the Blazers are currently playing with 14 players available, and with the recent departure of Steve Blake and Travis Outlaw to the lowly Los Angeles Clippers for a defensive Marcus Camby, Portland remains a player away from full roster capacity.

They now have until March 1 to get their 15th man.

The belief is with Blake gone and little trust in rookie Patty Mills when it comes to postseason time, Portland would choose to sign another point guard or guard – perhaps one with playoff experience.

Yet before we get into who may be on that shortlist or readily available players, here are the specifics:

The said player has to be on the roster by the March 1 deadline to be on Portland’s playoff roster. The Blazers can add a minimum player at anytime through the end of the season, but that player would not be playoff eligible.

Now that the NBA trade deadline has come and gone, no player who is on an NBA roster can be on another NBA teams playoff roster after March 1.

This basically leaves Portland with two options: sign a player from the D-League or a free agent through April 15 (date for rosters set for the 2010 NBA Playoffs) to be eligible for the postseason.

Essentially, the Blazers would be “renting” a player through the playoffs for the veteran’s minimum ($800,000 – which would be prorated at $300,000). The other option is to go the D-League route and sign a guy to 10-day contract. Likely, Portland would then sign that player to a second 10-day contract before signing them for the rest of the season for the veteran’s minimum.

As is the case every year after the deadline, a number of players are being waived around the league or are trying to be bought out of their contracts so they can be on the other teams roster by March 1 so they at least have a shot at a roster bound for the postseason.

The one name that made the rounds today in this case was Washington Wizards point guard Mike James.

As of Thursday night, James has been granted an indefinite leave by the Wiz in anticipation of a buyout. Washington had hopes of including James’ $6.6 million expiring contract in a possible trade, but one never materialized.

Word has it Cleveland, Miami and Charlotte are all interested in the now in-season free agent. There is no confirmation that Portland is interested in James at this point. His name just happens to be at the top of the point guard list as it stands.

While a list of possible D-League prospects is being compiled, other available guards/point guards range from Shaun Livingston, Brevin Knight, Jason Hart, Jacque Vaughn, Rashad McCants, Morris Almond and former Blazers Antonio Daniels and Von Wafer.

It’s only a matter of days before the Blazers round out their 15-man roster.

http://www.beyondthebeat.net/201002...ary/blazers-searching-for-their-15th-man.html
 
Re: Blazers Search for 15th Man

I wouldn't mind bringing James on. He's a solid vet, who can shoot the 3 and defend. I don't know if he'd accept a third-string role, but if he did, I'm all on board.

Among those names, I'd rate them:
Mike James
Brevin Knight
Antonio Daniels (if he can still play)
Jacque Vaughn
Jason Hart
Shaun Livingston

McCants and Wafer are SGs, which we don't need. And Almond I know nothing about.. heard of him, but have probably seen him play 2-3 mins total with the Jazz I think.
 
Re: Blazers Search for 15th Man

Mike James?!?

Who would want him when you can have...

0729_marbury_justintv_video.jpg
 
Re: Blazers Search for 15th Man

wtf happened to Marbury? Good gawd... what a weird dude.
 
Re: Blazers Search for 15th Man

wtf happened to Marbury? Good gawd... what a weird dude.

Playing over in China. Trying to sell his crappy plastic basketball shoes to the people who made them.
 
I believe that spot will be left vacant so that all the other guys on the roster will get more playing time and experience "if" we make the playoffs.
 
I believe that spot will be left vacant so that all the other guys on the roster will get more playing time and experience "if" we make the playoffs.

A) Just because we add a 15th guy doesn't mean he has to play.

B) We could have more injuries.

C) Let's bring back Von Wafer. He had a great playoffs last season. If Brandon is done for the year, Von Wafer's a nice substitute.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top