LMA put up almost 20 ppg on 49% shooting against Houston. I guess I'm not clear on what a "consistent" scorer is by your definition?
Game 1 (loss) 3-12 7pts 3 rbds 2 TO
Game 2 (win) 11-19 27pts 12 rbds 0 TO
Game 3 (loss) 6-15 13pts 8rbds 4 TO
Game 4 (loss) 8-17 19pts 10rbds 1 TO
Game 5 (win) 11-20 25pts 7 rbds 2 TO
Game 6 (loss) 12-21 26pts 5 rbds 1 TO
Aldridge was not the reason POR lost this series, but he was inconsistent in the first 4 games, and POR needed him to be solid in every single game to have a chance to win the series...more accurate would have been 60% instead of half...regardless though Aldridge is not the main issue I was making, because I think he finished the series strong, and will get better and more consistent (in the playoffs).....the problem is niether Aldridge or Roy got any help from the rest of the team...and while it is all good and optimistic to think that other players will step into that 3rd scoring role, it is certainly not something that I or IMO POR mgmt should feel comfortable with developin going into the season (and more importantly playoffs) with....ESPECIALLY when they have the assets (young players, picks) and wiggle room (available cap space) to go out and get that 3rd scoring option...and then IMO you are in a position of strength...and if an Oden, Bayless or Rudy develop into that 4th or 3rd wheel...well even better....
Why the need for a consistent 3rd scorer? Look below to illustrate my point
Top Scorer other that Roy & Aldridge
Game 1 (loss) Oden 15pts 5 rbds (Roy 21, Aldridge 7pts) -
Roy\Aldridge % of total offense 34.6%
Game 2 (win) Fernandez 11pts (Roy 42, Aldridge 27) -
Roy\Aldridge % of total offense 64.5%
Game 3 (loss) Fernandez 17pts (Blake had 16pts & 10 Asst) Roy 19, Aldridge 13 -
Roy\Aldridge % of total offense 38.6%
Game 4 (loss) Outlaw 14pts (Roy 31, Aldridge 19) -
Roy\Aldridge % of total offense 56.8%
Game 5 (win) Blake 15pts 7 rbds (Roy & Aldridge 25pts) -
Roy\Aldridge % of total offense 56.8%
Game 6 (loss) Outlaw 9pts (2-9 FG) Aldridge 26, Roy 22 -
Roy\Aldridge % of total offense 63.2%
So in the wins, not only did Roy & Aldridge have to account for over 60% of the entire offense, but they needed someone to at least step up into that 3rd role...Game 1 IMO was an enigma b\c it was such a lopsided blowout that most of the 4th quarter (1/2 way thru the 3rd?) was garbage time essentially)....In Game 2 Blake chipped in 10pts in support as well...
In essence they need more help if POR expects to ascend to an NBA title....and I don't think you cna win consistently in the playoffs with that being a commitee approach, and Roy isn't MJ, LeBron or Kobe....yet?
Now maybe that will come from within, but why put all of your chips down on that? Why not look to add a 3rd scoring piece and then if another player or 2 develop you are even in a stronger position IMO....