Politics Microchip anyone????

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Barfo demands you pay barfo support, too.

Yes, Mags, your check is late again by the way. See that you rectify the situation, or I'll have my union goons pay you a visit. And it won't turn out to be the paperboy this time, either.

barfo
 
No independent thought when blindly supporting a failure of an education system that could be improved without obstruction.

You don't get to pick and choose what you went to combat zones for. You surely didn't go to support the massive government spying programs, militarization of police, and the incarceration of young black men mostly because they are young black men.

I suppose it is a measure of how good the education system is doing if you can throw out and ignore the massive failures. Dismiss those as "urban" as if that has anything to do with teaching kids to read and write and do math.
 
You don't get to pick and choose what you went to combat zones for. You surely didn't go to support the massive government spying programs, militarization of police, and the incarceration of young black men mostly because they are young black men.
Whats up Denny? No Graph this time? Try to tell me about the incarceration of our young black men? Maybe you would like to discuss Recidivism? I am open to all levels and very well versed in the matter. I currently work with Phoenix Rising Transitions and Central City Concern here in Portland.
No one anywhere is blindly supporting the failures that most certainly do exist in our educational system. That was not your original statement. If you don't think "Urban" has anything to do with teaching kids to read and write then it is not me that needs education here. The very demographic you speak of being incarcerated seems to speak volumes.
Postal workers and public school teachers and firemen and cops and armed forces.
This is your original statement about the Government placing a microchip in People. I assume you mean that these people are playing right into the administrations hand and being led to the "Wolves" so to speak?
I have another question for you. What would you feel about the convicted felons being chipped or tagged for what they are? Kind of puts a new twist on the whole thing now doesn't it?
 
I was responding to "the government IS the 1%."

But go to town.

upload_2015-4-7_16-19-33.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2015-4-7_16-19-33.png
    upload_2015-4-7_16-19-33.png
    30 KB · Views: 10
As far as using microchips, I don't think you have the right to invade even a convicted felon's person. Why not do radical medical experiments on them, too?
 
That was my original point. The people who are in those jobs are simply not part of the 1%
 
I think it's OK to put one in barfo. He seems to really want that sort of thing.
 
You'd like to think that the 1% running the government are elected. But they're not.

So much for "democracy."
 
You'd like to think that the 1% running the government are elected. But they're not.

So much for "democracy."
Denny it absolutely is a giant problem. The elections are rigged. I don't even know that we really have any say any longer. I get the feel sometimes that there is this ebb and flow kind of thing that simply places money in different pockets from time to time but because i don't make lots of it i can only have what they allow me to have or what i can scratch out and save.
 
Obama and his goons have some things going to give power to their side. Like bring in more voters and infiltrate the red states.
George W. was the first elected president to win without getting the popular vote.
It isn't just one side here. We the people are in a war with our own country and most don't even realize it.
 
I don't think the elections are all that rigged, other than it's REALLY hard for a 3rd party to participate on equal footing with the big two.

Obama appointed 3 people to the FCC who just TOOK the property of the cable and phone companies.

They weren't elected.

Not just the FCC, but the FTC, the FEC, the IRS, and so on.
 
Obama and his goons have some things going to give power to their side.
George W. was the first elected president to win without getting the popular vote.
It isn't just one side here. We the people are in a war with our own country and most don't even realize it.

I don't think W was the first to not get the popular vote.

But the popular vote hasn't ever been how presidents have been elected. We could just make up rules so our favored candidates win, no matter what, eh?
 
I guess you are right on that. just looked it up Adams, Jackson, Hayes, and Harrison.
 
Even more so not sure the electoral college is a system that should be used any longer. Way out of date. they have the ability to get the count correct and quickly.
Maybe that will be their reasoning for a micro chip? Just joking....
 
The point of the electoral college is so NY, Florida, Texas, and California don't combine to elect the president, no matter how people in the other states vote.
 
The point of the electoral college is so NY, Florida, Texas, and California don't combine to elect the president, no matter how people in the other states vote.
But when have NY ,Texas, California, and Florida ever agreed on anything? If we could get them all to work together on something it would be a truly historic event. Maybe as good as the WWII movement? Again i am Joking...Kind of?
 
But when have NY ,Texas, California, and Florida ever agreed on anything? If we could get them all to work together on something it would be a truly historic event. Maybe as good as the WWII movement? Again i am Joking...Kind of?

All those states voted for Reagan for sure. I think GHW and Clinton, too.

Fact checked myself. Dukakis won NY against GHW. Clinton didn't win Texas in 1996.

The point stands though.

Without the electoral college, the candidates wouldn't bother campaigning in Wyoming or Nevada or Oregon...
 
All those states voted for Reagan for sure. I think GHW and Clinton, too.

Fact checked myself. Dukakis won NY against GHW. Clinton didn't win Texas in 1996.

The point stands though.

Without the electoral college, the candidates wouldn't bother campaigning in Wyoming or Nevada or Oregon...
Yeah. I think everyone was ready for Carter to be gone. Reagan had it easy.
Obama almost had all of them also. People were really ready for W to leave.
ElectoralCollege2008.svg.png
This is 2008. McCain didn't have a chance
 

Attachments

  • ElectoralCollege2008.svg.png
    ElectoralCollege2008.svg.png
    36.7 KB · Views: 12
If he were all about the politics, W would have chosen a VP candidate in 2004 who could have run for president in 2008. That he didn't was quite remarkable, if you're willing to give credit where credit is due. He wanted a fair fight, no incumbent.
 
Yeah. I think everyone was ready for Carter to be gone. Reagan had it easy.
Obama almost had all of them also. People were really ready for W to leave.
View attachment 4980
This is 2008. McCain didn't have a chance
This is why I think the GOP will easily win next election if they put forth a halfway competent candidate. Obama has really fucked up the neutral voter's confidence on the Democratic Party. It shows with how the republicans took congress
 
If he were all about the politics, W would have chosen a VP candidate in 2004 who could have run for president in 2008. That he didn't was quite remarkable, if you're willing to give credit where credit is due. He wanted a fair fight, no incumbent.

Or, Cheney had him by the balls and wouldn't let go, and/or W just didn't give a shit.

barfo
 
Or, Cheney had him by the balls and wouldn't let go, and/or W just didn't give a shit.

barfo

If Cheney had something on him, Scooter Libbey would have a pardon.

Any other wild guesses?
 
But the popular vote hasn't ever been how presidents have been elected. We could just make up rules so our favored candidates win, no matter what, eh?

No, that's the job of the supreme court.

barfo
 
Back
Top