blue9
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2012
- Messages
- 10,729
- Likes
- 7,169
- Points
- 113
I think there's only one person who wouldn't! (Well, maaaaaaybe Dame would take Frazier over Montero. So maybe two.)I'd keep Montero over both Pressy and Frazier.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think there's only one person who wouldn't! (Well, maaaaaaybe Dame would take Frazier over Montero. So maybe two.)I'd keep Montero over both Pressy and Frazier.
Only one person is fighting over Frazier. The rest of us are fighting over logic.Do you people realize that we're fighting over Tim Frazier? Think about that for a second...... TIM FRAZIER.
Only one person is fighting over Frazier. The rest of us are fighting over logic.
(Two posts in a row referencing logic!)
Precisely!It's illogical to fight over TIM FRAZIER!
Frazier - Almost 25 - 11 Career GamesKarl-Anthony Towns? Zero. That guy sucks!
WELCOME TO THE OFFSEASON MOTHERFUCKER!!!Precisely!
It's relevant to your use of "miserably" and "fialed" when describing Alexander's turn at Kansas.How is this remotely even relevant? Maybe I missed the Memo? Are cuts being made today?
So what was the point you were trying to make? That he needs more time to be evaluated? Yeah I said to keep him around...It's relevant to your use of "miserably" and "fialed" when describing Alexander's turn at Kansas.
If you knew the backstory on Cliff Alexander you might've been able to deduce who and what I was talking about. I should've been clearer I suppose, but I did tie into who I was talking about by using Schilly's choice descriptors. I did give a hint, nonetheless.WHAAAAAAT!!!!???
I was trying to point out the flaw of stating that Alexander failed miserably. We would all fail miserably if we were deemed ineligible halfway through the season. I just think it's the wrong way to describe a situation when we are talking about performance, err, strictly performance. He was NOT a miserable failure when he DID play. Do you see what I am getting at?So what was the point you were trying to make? That he needs more time to be evaluated? Yeah I said to keep him around...
Don't get carried away. Montero, Frazier, Alexander, and Pressey were passed over 60 times in the draft. GMs didn't think much of the great potential you guys see in Alexander and Montero.
Meanwhile, Frazier and Pressey, though low potential, are polished and developed. It's Tank vs. Try To Win. Blazer4Ever is being reasonable, for trying to win.
Those are good numbers per minute. There were a lot of questions as to why Self chose to limit his minutes based on his superior performance. I've also known about Cliff Alexander since the summer of 2013 in case you didn't think I knew what we were talking about.And in case you are wondering... Cliff Alexander was a top 5 College recruit. DraftExpress had him going #2 over all from April through the end of July last summer, then he dropped to 5 through mid November, about the time College starts playing, End of November he was at 10. 15 by mid December then hovered around 17 till mid Feb and then dropped to 31 hovered a while then dropped to 41-45 till about draft time spiked up to 25 a couple days before the draft then went undrafted.
He played 28 games as a freshman at Kansas and in 17 mpg went for 7.1pts and 5.3rebs. Based on the Hype that was a bit of a failed season, comparable to the lack of production to Anthony Bennett in his rookie season.
It's illogical to fight over TIM FRAZIER!

I get what you are saying and I don't disagree in the least though he was a top 5 recruit and didn't put up top 5 recruit numbers, that was the point I was making.I was trying to point out the flaw of stating that Alexander failed miserably. We would all fail miserably if we were deemed ineligible halfway through the season. I just think it's the wrong way to describe a situation when we are talking about performance, err, strictly performance. He was NOT a miserable failure when he DID play. Do you see what I am getting at?
If you knew the backstory on Cliff Alexander you might've been able to deduce who and what I was talking about.
And in case you are wondering... Cliff Alexander was a top 5 College recruit. DraftExpress had him going #2 over all from April through the end of July last summer, then he dropped to 5 through mid November, about the time College starts playing, End of November he was at 10. 15 by mid December then hovered around 17 till mid Feb and then dropped to 31 hovered a while then dropped to 41-45 till about draft time spiked up to 25 a couple days before the draft then went undrafted.
He played 28 games as a freshman at Kansas and in 17 mpg went for 7.1pts and 5.3rebs. Based on the Hype that was a bit of a failed season, comparable to the lack of production to Anthony Bennett in his rookie season.
I was trying to point out the flaw of stating that Alexander failed miserably. We would all fail miserably if we were deemed ineligible halfway through the season. I just think it's the wrong way to describe a situation when we are talking about performance, err, strictly performance. He was NOT a miserable failure when he DID play. Do you see what I am getting at?
So that brings it back to my initial post on this thread.... We aren't good enough this year for that to matter.... In fact while preserving the T word, I would say it's not our priority to have our 14th and 1th guys on the roster helping us win games.... For that matter in what case is a 14th or 15th guy actually affect a team overall? At least these guys could have a 2 year window to move up to 11 or 12.Yes...that all 30 GMs lacked the draft information that this board's posters read in articles long ago.
If Montero and Alexander become good players, they'll each be on their 3rd or 4th NBA team, after efforts from many assistant coaches. The first team is the sucker team.
It has become shockingly absurd how protective some people have become of the 13th, 14, and 15th spots on our roster.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Frazier is a rotation player in my book, even an important one. I see him as our 1st pg of the bench and playing alongside Damian with Dame at the 2. I think he could be our 3rd guard behind Dame and CJ and I think he is an undiscovered gem.
Short answer: noThis year is about OBTAINING and DEVELOPING players for the future. Our goals are: Player Development, Draft Position, and Trades for better players.
Now, does anyone know or have heard how much the buyout for Miller amounts to????
The first team is the sucker team.
It has become shockingly absurd how protective some people have become of the 13th, 14, and 15th spots on our roster.
Was Utah the sucker team for Wesley?
Short answer: no
Long answer: does it really matter?
