Moda Center logo

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Hate it. I've been down with most decisions associated with the Blazers' style. Definitely not this.
 
don't forget quickin loans arena or whatever it's called.

I don't care what it's called or what the logo looks like. I care about how many wins the Blazers get and hopefully them winning an NBA title before I die.
 
If it was a rainbow rose, i'd say you're right. As it stands right now, it's just slightly feminine. Big difference.

But the "d" sort of looks like a male symbol . . . but the arrow is pink . . . dare I say the sign is . . . . . . . . . .. .
 
Hate it. I've been down with most decisions associated with the Blazers' style. Definitely not this.

If the Blazers are able to drop a few extra million dollars into the Rose Quarter (MC) and the fan experience I think it will turn out to be a good decision.
 
PS I am predicting the new chalupa will be a half price jamba juice or something.
 
don't forget quickin loans arena or whatever it's called.

I don't care what it's called or what the logo looks like. I care about how many wins the Blazers get and hopefully them winning an NBA title before I die.

This
 
For 10 years and $40 million I would have that logo tattooed on my face.
 
I have no problem with selling the naming rights, really. It's a business decision. (I think ODS changing their name to MODA was a poor choice on their part, but that's just me, and a completely separate issue). What I don't get is the idea that selling the naming rights/logo and having the result be something that doesn't make the Rose Garden look like a giant package of feminine hygiene products is necessarily mutually exclusive. They should have been able to sell out and remain proud of the result. There is making a deal to make money, and there is pimping yourself out for a buck regardless of the level of humiliation. Did they not have choices? If this were a WNBA team, I think the new logo would be fine.
 
I have no problem with selling the naming rights, really. It's a business decision. (I think ODS changing their name to MODA was a poor choice on their part, but that's just me, and a completely separate issue). What I don't get is the idea that selling the naming rights/logo and having the result be something that doesn't make the Rose Garden look like a giant package of feminine hygiene products is necessarily mutually exclusive. They should have been able to sell out and remain proud of the result. There is making a deal to make money, and there is pimping yourself out for a buck regardless of the level of humiliation. Did they not have choices? If this were a WNBA team, I think the new logo would be fine.

I just today figured out that Moda is an insurance company. Never heard of it before and no wonder, they don't sell it in my county.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top