Per 36 he is basically a Batum rebounder, so fine for a SF
Batum isn't a great rebounder either
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Per 36 he is basically a Batum rebounder, so fine for a SF
Batum isn't a great rebounder either
Scratching my head on people finding negatives in this trade.
The trade is good, but we're still about to invest minutes and a roster spot for a non legit 3.
We suddenly have a lot of guys that, at least in this part of their development, are best running and attacking the hoop. Are we about to run?
We are gonna attack the shit out of the basket this yearStotts better change his offensive philosophy of launching 3s all day and running pick and pops. With this group it will never work. Our offense is going to be Dame shooting 30 times per game and the other 4 guys crashing the offensive boards for offensive put backs.
Not sure we have a choice?
hmmmm it is interesting to see if Stotts can adapt to these players - sorta seems more like a Thibs oriented team doesn't it? lolStotts better change his offensive philosophy of launching 3s all day and running pick and pops. With this group it will never work. Our offense is going to be Dame shooting 30 times per game and the other 4 guys crashing the offensive boards for offensive put backs.
will/can Stotts adjust? is Thibs still available?Agreed. And that kinda excites me. Just so different from what we're used to with Stotts.
I believe this is about a two to four year "re-calibration".This trade is just another ho-hum move in an offseason full of ho-hum moves. Nothing to get excited about, or hate, but for the price, guess the trade is OK.
The real problem is, we only have one playoff caliber starter, two lottery team caliber starters, a few nice bench players that would have been nice to have 2 seasons ago, and a bunch of blue sky. We need another playoff caliber starter, not more bench players and blue sky.
this one costs us chump change and a one season look in a season which is about just that, he's 22 knows this is his chance, well worth the very low cost gamble IMOIt bothers me that the big knock on him is he doesn't play with a motor or with a lot of intensity. That's Doug Collins' take on him anyways.
We got rid of a SF that had the same problem
30% from inside the three foot line, that is concerning, not to mention his poor free throw shooting; he but it's just a gamble; we all know that. This is a good year to gamble.
