NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2 (Merged)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

and that doesnt even include the #21 or elliot williams...epic fail
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

mcgee.jpg

Of course, that's based on Lewis' PER of 12.0 this year, which I seriously doubt would be repeated. In fact, if anyone would be able to get all-star caliber production out of Lewis again, wouldn't it be Nate?
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

^Cause the team moved last night!
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

Lewis is done ... put a fork in him.
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

now hollingers little computer thingy isnt the end all be all by any means, trading any vet for potential is gonna hurt statwise
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

JaVale McGee - seriously? He's a slightly richer man's Keith Closs. Nevada fans thought it was Christmas when he was superseded by Luke Babbitt. The only thing he's got going for him is he was born in beautiful Flint, Michigan.
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

Kanter's offensive game is very similar to Okur. He doesn't have his range yet but Kanter/McGee could easily work. I don't see why this would make JaVale available.
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

Blazers took Faried out to dinner last night. They really, really like him. (via BFT)
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

I wonder if they took him to Caramico's?
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

Walker pulled out of workout against Jimmer.

Hmmmm, interesting.
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

I would be ecstatic if we drafted Faried.
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

I would be ecstatic if we drafted Faried.

Not sure "ecstatic" is the word I would use.....maybe ho-hum instead?

McMillan compares him to a Reggie Evans type of player, which is not overly appealing to me...


POR needs some scorers, players who can creat 1v1 and a backup PG more than they need a b\u PF, and there are a fair amount of intriguing options for a b\u PF in free agency...Carl Landry & Kris Humphries are 2 that come to mind.....Freeland would be another possibility...

Rather see POR go for a PG or a scorer....

Wouldn't mind seeing them acquire a 2nd 1st rounder to get a big man, maybe a center like Benson or Tyler. Vucevic looks like a big stiff to me...
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

Kemba and Knight are working out today in Toronto. Separately.

Makes no sense to me. I remember in 06, when Roy, Gay, Ammo, and Hassan Adams, four of the top wing prospects in that draft came out to PDX to workout together.
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

Not sure "ecstatic" is the word I would use.....maybe ho-hum instead?

McMillan compares him to a Reggie Evans type of player, which is not overly appealing to me...


POR needs some scorers, players who can creat 1v1 and a backup PG more than they need a b\u PF, and there are a fair amount of intriguing options for a b\u PF in free agency...Carl Landry & Kris Humphries are 2 that come to mind.....Freeland would be another possibility...

Rather see POR go for a PG or a scorer....

Wouldn't mind seeing them acquire a 2nd 1st rounder to get a big man, maybe a center like Benson or Tyler. Vucevic looks like a big stiff to me...
We are definitely in agreement with the needs that we have, and should fill this offseason. But if we are not very active this draft and stick at #21 and Faried is still there, I will be more than happy if we take him.

I think his dominance on the boards will definitely translate to the NBA and is something we need off of the bench, and possibly in the starting lineup. As Camby continues to age and the year-to-year health of Oden up in the air, Faried would give us a pretty good option at the 4.

If Oden never truly makes it into the starting lineup, I can see Faried starting down the road at the 4 with LMA at the 5, and I think it'd be a pretty effective lineup if you add Crash/Wesley and whoever is our PG in there.

Also, with the lockout and the amount of money that would need to be spent on Humphries and Landry to just come in here and backup the 4, would just simply not be worth it.
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

It'd be an effective rebounding lineup. But with a limited offensive game, Faried on the floor doesn't help LMA at all to avoid double teams.
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

It'd be an effective rebounding lineup. But with a limited offensive game, Faried on the floor doesn't help LMA at all to avoid double teams.
I think Faried would excel with an active point guard. He's the guy that will outwork others to get near the basket.
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

I think Faried would excel with an active point guard. He's the guy that will outwork others to get near the basket.

Agreed. But that is also Matthews, Wallace, and then him. It doesn't help out LMA all that much on offense, and really, it puts even more pressure on Miller, as if he is off, it's LMA or nothing. Or, you're asking guys to do something they sdhouldn't necessarily be, creating for themselves, which they aren't that great at. Obviously with a big gap in talent, but it's the same issue we had with Roy and LMA, and then surrounding them with guys like Blake, Outlaw, Webster, Joel, Batum. You double the main play maker(Andre, Roy), and you're left with 3 guys on the court that aren't great at creating for themselves in a half court set. And we get bogged down. We've seen it for the last 4 years or so.
I know it's partly a coaching issue, but it's a fit/talent issue as well. Can't have that many players dependent on one guy to get them shots. It's easier to stop.
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

Agreed. But that is also Matthews, Wallace, and then him. It doesn't help out LMA all that much on offense, and really, it puts even more pressure on Miller, as if he is off, it's LMA or nothing. Or, you're asking guys to do something they sdhouldn't necessarily be, creating for themselves, which they aren't that great at. Obviously with a big gap in talent, but it's the same issue we had with Roy and LMA, and then surrounding them with guys like Blake, Outlaw, Webster, Joel, Batum. You double the main play maker(Andre, Roy), and you're left with 3 guys on the court that aren't great at creating for themselves in a half court set. And we get bogged down. We've seen it for the last 4 years or so.
I know it's partly a coaching issue, but it's a fit/talent issue as well. Can't have that many players dependent on one guy to get them shots. It's easier to stop.
Well, I don't think he should be starting, but if he is, preferably Wallace gets moved for a shooter/play maker.

BUT, I don't think you should be looking for playmakers at the 5 (or 4?) anyways, so I can't see how this relates to Faried.
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

Givony on his most recent podcast was really high on Montiejunas.

[video=youtube;IFqK-YXlsHs]

He was supposed to be the top pick of this draft, but has dropped because of some stagnation in his development this year. Givony said his effort isn't always there. But if he drops to us, I'd take him over Faried because he's more skilled.
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

Just for clarification, I'm not even sure if Faried will ever even be a starter in the NBA, but I think he can be an impact player, especially coming off the bench for us, even next year. With out lack of consistent health, we depend a lot on LMA to rebound AND dominate on the offensive end, and I think adding Faried really gives us some depth up front that can take some of that pressure off LMA (if Camby/Oden) are not healthy and LMA is forced to play the 5.

Good point on the PG, as I think that is not only something Faried would benefit from, but LMA as well. I identify that as our biggest need in this draft/offseason is adding a PG, even a project, that is active and create with penetration (and hopefully better shooting than 'Dre).
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

Givony on his most recent podcast was really high on Montiejunas.

[video=youtube;IFqK-YXlsHs]

He was supposed to be the top pick of this draft, but has dropped because of some stagnation in his development this year. Givony said his effort isn't always there. But if he drops to us, I'd take him over Faried because he's more skilled.


I'm going purely off of youtube highlights but I've been saying for weeks that this guy has INSANE offensive skills. So far Kanter, Valanciunas, Biyombo, and Vesely have been seen as easily better by most sources. Donatas seems like a fucking TERRIBLE defender/ rebounder but shit look at that offensive game. Athletic 7 footer with excellent footwork, gorgeous fluidity (Valanciunas on the other hand looks stiff and mechanical), finishes with both hands (Kanter had zero left hand at Nike hoop summit and I have a hard time believing hes become ambidextrous in a year-year and a half), can dribble drive on big guys, shoot out to 3 pt range, score in the post. Even if he becomes Andrea Bargnani that's a good pick considering where most mock's have him projected. If he fills out and rebounds a little better who's to say he doesn't become a Rasheed type of guy (less defense) as far as ability to score from all over the court.
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

Givoni was on David Locke's radio show today and said that Donatas should be the clear-cut #1 pick but he held himself back by coasting a lot. The 'doesn't love the game' talk surrounding him sounds like it has some substance to it. Though, I'd still trade up for him if we had the chance.
 
Last edited:
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

#21 -- Portland Trail Blazers


Kenneth Faried

Position: PF
Height: 6-8
Weight: 225
Age: 21
School: Morehead State

Analysis: The Blazers fell in love with Faried last year before he withdrew from the draft. If they are fortunate enough to get a second chance at him this year, they'll grab him.

His relentlessness on the boards is a nice complement to LaMarcus Aldridge's more offensive-minded style. Markieff Morris, Tobias Harris, Darius Morris, Reggie Jackson and Nikola Vucevic are other players to watch.

Via Chad Ford's Draft Mock 4.0
 
Re: NBA Draft Thread Vol. 2

There's no way Faried will fall to #21. I hope Chad & Co. are planning on trading up!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top